Continuous Quality Improvement for Diabetes
1 other identifier
interventional
10
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare health care delivery outcomes and costs achieved by two different approaches to health care delivery. The investigators will compare health outcomes for groups of adult patents with diabetes. One group will be managed by our traditional approach to diabetes care. The second group's care delivery is structured according to a design consistent with the Chronic Care Model (CCM).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2 diabetes
Started Apr 2005
Longer than P75 for phase_2 diabetes
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 5, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 6, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2011
CompletedMay 10, 2016
May 1, 2016
2.9 years
February 5, 2009
May 6, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
resource utilization
baseline compared to 2 years intervention
Secondary Outcomes (2)
compliance with process measures
3 years
metabolic outcome
3 years
Study Arms (2)
traditional
NO INTERVENTIONThe traditional arm is composed of primary care physicians who continue the health care delivery model existing for the 5 years prior to the study. The traditional includes the physician, a pool of resources including random assignment of diabetic educators and includes the entire panel of patients assigned to the PCP.
care management
EXPERIMENTALThe care management group is composed of primary care physicians who have been assigned a specific physician extender, the care manager, and an additional medical assistant and form a care manager team working together with registry support, team meetings and instruction in self-management and includes the entire panel of patients assigned to the PCP.
Interventions
The care management team is organized according to the chronic care model for health care delivery. They are supported by an information registry for diabetes, receive instruction in self-management, have redesigned their work flow to include delegation of functions to care managers who follow specific guidelines and protocols for managing diabetes
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Primary care physicians practicing in a designated site with \> 200 patients assigned to their panel who have been diagnosed with diabetes
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal to give informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Kearns P. Diabetes Care Management Teams Did Not Reduce Utilization When Compared With Traditional Care: A Randomized Cluster Trial. Manag Care. 2017 Oct;26(10):33-40.
PMID: 29068297DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Patrick J Kearns, MD
Santa Clara Valley Health & Hospital System
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director, Chronic Care Mangement
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 5, 2009
First Posted
February 6, 2009
Study Start
April 1, 2005
Primary Completion
March 1, 2008
Study Completion
April 1, 2011
Last Updated
May 10, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Data will be shared in a peer review journal