Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Benzoyl Peroxide Used in Combination With Clindamycin vs. Benzoyl Peroxide Used in Combination With Clindamycin and Doxycycline in the Treatment of Moderate Acne
1 other identifier
interventional
33
1 country
2
Brief Summary
To compare the efficacy and safety of Benzoyl peroxide used in combination with clindamycin vs. Benzoyl peroxide used in combination with clindamycin and doxycycline in the treatment of moderate acne
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Aug 2007
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 4, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 31, 2010
CompletedMay 25, 2017
May 1, 2017
1 year
February 4, 2009
April 7, 2010
May 24, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Percent Change in Inflammatory Acne Lesions From Baseline to Week 16
Percent change from baseline to week 16 in inflammatory acne lesions (pustules/papules)(chest and back)
Baseline, Week 16
Percent (%) Change in Non-inflammatory Acne Lesions From Baseline to Week 16.
Percent change in Non-inflammatory acne lesions (whiteheads and blackheads)(chest and back) from baseline to week 16.
Baseline, Week 16
Percent Change in Total Acne Lesion Counts From Baseline to Week 16
Percent change from baseline to week 16 in total acne lesions (inflammatory + non-inflammatory)
Baseline, Week 16
Change in Investigator Global Assessment (IGA)
Change in Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Average values chest and back. IGA scale: 0 - Clear 0.5 - Clear/almost clear 1. Almost Clear 1.5- Almost Clear/Mild 2. Mild 2.5- Mild/Moderate 3. Moderate 3.5- Moderate/Severe
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8,12, and 16
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Percent (%) Change in Inflammatory Lesion Counts (Chest and Back) From Baseline to Week 12
Baseline, Week 12
Percent Change in Non-inflammatory Lesions (Chest and Back) From Baseline to Week 12
Baseline, Week 12
Percent Change in Total Lesions (Chest and Back) From Baseline to Week 12
Week 12
Percentage of Particpants With IGA Score at Week 16
Baseline, Week 16
Study Arms (2)
BPO with clindamycin foam
ACTIVE COMPARATORBenzoyl peroxide (BPO) wash with clindamycin foam
BPO + clindamycin foam + doxycycline
ACTIVE COMPARATORBenzoyl peroxide (BPO) wash with clindamycin foam and doxycycline capsules
Interventions
Benzoyl peroxide wash - Clindamycin foam
Benzoyl peroxide wash - Clindamycin foam - Doxycycline capsules
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female subjects with acne vulgaris . Able to understand the requirements of the study and sign informed consent/HIPAA authorization forms.
You may not qualify if:
- Known hypersensitivity to any of the components of the study drugs or used of prohibited medications or any medical condition that contraindicate the subject's participation in the clinical study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Stiefel, a GSK Companylead
- GlaxoSmithKlinecollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Center for Dermatology, Cosmetic and Laser Surgery
Fremont, California, 94538, United States
Las Vegas Skin & Cancer Clinic
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89129, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Small sample size did not provide adequate power. Even with the limited sample size, total lesion counts provides a more reliable view of the study data due to the greater number of lesions to work with.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- GSK Response Center
- Organization
- GlaxoSmithKline
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
GSK Clinical Trials
GlaxoSmithKline
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 4, 2009
First Posted
February 5, 2009
Study Start
August 1, 2007
Primary Completion
August 1, 2008
Study Completion
August 1, 2008
Last Updated
May 25, 2017
Results First Posted
August 31, 2010
Record last verified: 2017-05