Sheffield Physical Activity Booster Trial
Booster
A Randomised Controlled Trial and Cost-effectiveness Evaluation of "Booster" Interventions to Sustain Increases in Physical Activity in Middle-aged Adults in Deprived Urban Neighbourhoods.
3 other identifiers
interventional
282
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Adults that increase their physical activity can improve their health, and reduce future risks to health, but long-term changes are difficult to sustain. This study assesses whether it is worth providing further support, 3 months after giving initial advice, to those who have managed to do more physical activity. All participants will initially be given an interactive DVD. A researcher from Sheffield Hallam University will provide two telephone follow ups at one month intervals to assess physical activity levels. Only those that have increased their physical activity at this point will remain in the study. These participants will receive a "mini booster", a "full booster" or no booster. The "mini booster" consists of a two telephone calls one month apart to discuss physical activity and usage of the DVD. A "full booster" consists of a face-to-face meeting with the facilitator at the same intervals. The purpose of these booster sessions is to help the individual to maintain their increase in physical activity. The investigators will measure the differences in physical activity, quality of life and costs, associated with the booster interventions, 3 months and 9 months from randomisation. The research will be carried out in 20 of the most deprived neighbourhoods in Sheffield. These locations have large, ethnically diverse populations, high levels of economic deprivation, low levels of physical activity, poorer health and shorter life expectancy. Participants will be recruited through general practices and community groups, as well as by postal invitation to ensure the participation of minority ethnic groups and those with lower levels of literacy. Sheffield City Council and Primary Care Trust fund a range of facilities and activities to promote physical activity and variations in access to these between neighbourhoods will make it possible to examine whether the effectiveness of the intervention is modified by access to community facilities.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2009
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 3, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 4, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2013
CompletedDecember 2, 2014
December 1, 2014
3.1 years
February 3, 2009
December 1, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Physical activity measured by accelerometry.
3 months post-randomisation
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Physical activity assessed by accelerometry.
9 months post-randomisation
Self-reported moderate or strenuous physical activity using the Scottish Physical Activity Questionnaire (SPAQ, incorporating Stage of Change information) which records type and duration of activities in the previous week
3 months and 9 months post-randomisation
Health-related quality of life using the Sheffield Version SF-12v2 plus 4 survey instrument
3 months and 9 months post-randomisation
Self-reported use of community facilities for physical activity
3 months and 9 months post-randomisation
Self-reported health and social care contacts
3 months and 9 months post-randomisation
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Control
NO INTERVENTIONMini Booster
EXPERIMENTALFull Booster
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Two telephone-based physical activity consultations, delivered in a motivational interviewing style, at one month and two months from randomisation
Two face-to-face physical activity consultations, delivered in a motivational interviewing style, at one month and two months from randomisation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Residents of the 20 most deprived neighbourhoods in the city of Sheffield
- Aged 40 to 64 years
- Not achieving the current recommended activity level (30 mins of moderate activity on at least 5 days) assessed using the SPAQ (Lowther, 1999) and wishing to have support to become more active
You may not qualify if:
- Have increased their physical activity level by at least 30 mins of moderate or vigorous activity per week (assessed using the SPAQ) since initial assessment of activity level
- Capacity to give written informed consent to trial participation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Richard Hudsonlead
- NHS Health Technology Assessment Programmecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Centre for Sport and Exercise Science, Sheffield Hallam University
Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 2BP, United Kingdom
Related Publications (4)
Goyder, Elizabeth, et al.
RESULTCopeland RJ, Horspool K, Humphreys L, Scott E; Booster trial team. Recruiting to a large-scale physical activity randomised controlled trial - experiences with the gift of hindsight. Trials. 2016 Feb 24;17(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1229-0.
PMID: 26908117DERIVEDGoyder E, Hind D, Breckon J, Dimairo M, Minton J, Everson-Hock E, Read S, Copeland R, Crank H, Horspool K, Humphreys L, Hutchison A, Kesterton S, Latimer N, Scott E, Swaile P, Walters SJ, Wood R, Collins K, Cooper C. A randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness evaluation of 'booster' interventions to sustain increases in physical activity in middle-aged adults in deprived urban neighbourhoods. Health Technol Assess. 2014 Feb;18(13):1-210. doi: 10.3310/hta18130.
PMID: 24571932DERIVEDHind D, Scott EJ, Copeland R, Breckon JD, Crank H, Walters SJ, Brazier JE, Nicholl J, Cooper C, Goyder E. A randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness evaluation of "booster" interventions to sustain increases in physical activity in middle-aged adults in deprived urban neighbourhoods. BMC Public Health. 2010 Jan 4;10:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-3.
PMID: 20047672DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Liddy Goyder, MD FFPH
University of Sheffield
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Sponsor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 3, 2009
First Posted
February 4, 2009
Study Start
November 1, 2009
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2013
Last Updated
December 2, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-12