Adjusting Antiretroviral Therapy Dosage Using Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
TDM
1 other identifier
interventional
12
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background Low concentrations of protease inhibitors (PIs) or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) are associated with an increased risk of virological failure. Likewise, excessive antiretroviral drug concentrations increase the risk of toxicity. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may identify and correct excessively high or low PI and/or NNRTI concentrations, and thus minimize toxicity and risk of treatment failure. Treatment guidelines only recommend using TDM to help optimize ARV therapy in selected patients, and there are no clear recommendations to guide the clinician who decides to adjust drug doses. Prospective studies have demonstrated the relationship between EFV plasma concentration and neuropsychiatric symptoms. Moreover, EFV is metabolized mainly by cytochrome P450 2B6 and its concentration was reported to be associated with the CYP2B6 516GrT genetic polymorphism. For drugs such as EFV or LPV/r, lower doses than the ones validated for standard clinical use have demonstrated efficacy in dose-ranging studies. The investigators will use a standardised algorithm to reduce doses in patients with plasma EFV or LPV/r concentration above percentile 75. This algorithm is based on a Bayesian approach from the pharmacology unit in Lausanne. The investigators hypothesize that a dosage individualisation is feasible and safe. 2.2 Study Aims The investigators aim at testing a simplified algorithm for dose reduction in patients with documented virological efficacy, treated by a stable LPV/r or EFV based regimen with elevated plasma concentration of these drugs. Study Design Prospective open label study in which all eligible patients screened with a plasma drug concentration of either EFV or LPV/r above percentile 75 will be included. After confirmation of the results at baseline, patients will be offered to decrease drug dosage by a third or a half according to a standardised algorithm. All patients will undergo HIVRNA, biochemistry and validated questionnaires after 3 and 6 months to assess the safety and the benefit of this strategy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Mar 2008
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 3, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 4, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2009
CompletedJuly 23, 2009
July 1, 2009
1.1 years
February 3, 2009
July 21, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of patients who reach a plasma concentration within targets (P25-P75) after at least one cycle (and maximum two cycles) of dose reduction according to the provided algorithm at 6 months
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of patients who reach a plasma concentration within targets (P25-P75) after at least one cycle of dose reduction -percentage of spared drugs through TDM-guided dosage adaptation over a 6 months period. Compliance: electronic pills count
6 months
Study Arms (2)
LPV
EXPERIMENTALPatients with blood levels measured 2 times at 2 weeks intervals in the upper quartile (\>percentile 75) of concentrations reported under standard therapy (i.e. EFV 600 mg q.d. or LPV/r 400 or 533 mg bid) will have their dose reduced by approximately one third, with the aim to bring their concentration in the 25-75% percentile range.
EFV
EXPERIMENTALPatients with blood levels measured 2 times at 2 weeks intervals in the upper quartile (\>percentile 75) of concentrations reported under standard therapy (i.e. EFV 600 mg q.d. or LPV/r 400 or 533 mg bid) will have their dose reduced by approximately one third, with the aim to bring their concentration in the 25-75% percentile range.
Interventions
Patients with blood levels measured 2 times at 2 weeks intervals in the upper quartile (\>percentile 75) of concentrations reported under standard therapy (i.e. EFV 600 mg q.d. or LPV/r 400 or 533 mg bid) will have their dose reduced by approximately one third, with the aim to bring their concentration in the 25-75% percentile range.
Patients with blood levels measured 2 times at 2 weeks intervals in the upper quartile (\>percentile 75) of concentrations reported under standard therapy (i.e. EFV 600 mg q.d. or LPV/r 400 or 533 mg bid) will have their dose reduced by approximately one third, with the aim to bring their concentration in the 25-75% percentile range.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Stable regimen including either EFV or LPV/r
- HIVRNA below 40 copies since at least 3 months
- Antiretroviral drug concentration (EFV, LPV/r) plasma concentration at screening above P75
- Signed consent for the SHCS genetics core project
You may not qualify if:
- Concomitant medication:Amiodarone, bepidril, flecainide, propafenone, quinidine,Astemizole, terfenadine,Dihydroergotamine, ergotamine,Midazolam, triazolam,Cisapride,Pimozide,Rifabutin
- Renal or hepatic impairment
- Pregnancy or wish to become pregnant within the next 6 months
- Both EFV and LPV/r as part of the antiretroviral drug regimen
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Hospital, Genevalead
- Swiss HIV Cohort Studycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University Hopistal of Geneva
Geneva, Canton of Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alexandra AC Calmy
University Hospital, Geneva
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 3, 2009
First Posted
February 4, 2009
Study Start
March 1, 2008
Primary Completion
April 1, 2009
Study Completion
April 1, 2009
Last Updated
July 23, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-07