Clinical Equivalence of Two Butenafine Hydrochloride 1% Creams in Patients With Interdigital Tinea Pedis
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Design, Multiple-Site Study to Evaluate the Clinical Equivalence of Two Butenafine Hydrochloride 1% Creams in Patients With Interdigital Tinea Pedis
1 other identifier
interventional
548
2 countries
17
Brief Summary
To demonstrate comparable safety and efficacy of Taro Pharmaceuticals Inc. butenafine hydrochloride cream 1% (test product) and Lotrimin Ultra® cream (reference listed drug) in the treatment of interdigital tinea pedis, and to show the superiority of the active treatments over that of the placebo (vehicle).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Jun 2008
Shorter than P25 for phase_1
17 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 30, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 3, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 6, 2009
CompletedFebruary 4, 2014
January 1, 2014
4 months
January 30, 2009
May 4, 2009
January 2, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Therapeutic Cure - Superiority Analysis
Therapeutic Cure requires both Clinical Cure and Mycological Cure. Clinical Cure was based on the following signs and symptoms: fissuring, erythema, maceration, vesiculation, scaling, exudation, pruritus, burning. Each clinical symptom was evaluated using a 0-3 point rating scale: none=0, mild=1, moderate=2 or severe=3. If the score for erythema was ≤ 2 and the sum for all of the other 7 signs and symptoms was \<2 then the patient was considered a Clinical Cure. Mycological Cure: The potassium hydroxide (KOH) and the fungal culture were both negative.
42 days
Therapeutic Cure Non-Inferiority Comparison of Butenafine Cream and Lotrimin Ultra
Patient was cured both by symptoms (Clinical Cure) and by the results of fungal testing (Mycological Cure).
42 days
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Therapeutic Cure
7 days
Mycologic Cure
42 days
Clinical Cure
42 days
Safety and Adverse Event Profile
42 days
Study Arms (3)
Butenafine cream 1% (Taro)
EXPERIMENTALButenafine cream manufactured by Taro applied for 7 days
Lotrimin Ultra (butenafine) 1%
ACTIVE COMPARATORLotrimin Ultra (butenafine) applied for 7 days
Vehicle
PLACEBO COMPARATORButenafine vehicle applied for 7 days
Interventions
Treatment applied to affected area twice daily for 7 days
Treatment applied to affected area twice daily for 7 days
Treatment applied to affected area twice daily for 7 days
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Microbiologically confirmed clinical diagnosis of interdigital tinea pedis
- If female and of child bearing potential, prepare to abstain from sexual intercourse or use a reliable method of contraception during the study (e.g., condom, intra-uterine device (IUD), oral, transdermal, injected or implanted hormonal contraceptives).
- A confirmed clinical diagnosis of interdigital tinea pedis. Lesions are to be predominately interdigital but may extend to other areas of the foot (the non-interdigital lesions must not be hyperkeratotic).
- The presence of tinea pedis infection, confirmed by the observation of segmented fungal hyphae during a microscopic potassium hydroxide (KOH) wet mount examination (potassium hydroxide mount preparation).
- Identification of an appropriate dermatophyte by culture sent to the central laboratory. The appropriate dermatophytes are Trichophyton rubrum, Trichophyton mentagrophyte or Epidermophyton floccosum.
You may not qualify if:
- Use of any of the following within the indicated timeline:
- Oral or injectable steroids
- Any oral anti-fungals within 4 weeks of the study start
- Use of topical corticosteroids or any other topical antipruritics on the feet within 72 hours of the study start.
- Any prescription or over-the-counter (OTC) topical antifungals on the feet within two weeks prior to study entry
- Use of any antihistamines within 72 hours of the study start.
- Any known hypersensitivity to butenafine or other antifungal agents.
- Evidence of any concurrent dermatophytic infection of toe nails (onychomycosis) or other dermatological condition of the foot that may interfere with the Investigator's evaluation of tinea pedis.
- Patients with recurrent tinea pedis (more than 3 infections in the past 12 months) who have been unresponsive to previous antifungal therapy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (17)
Investigator Site
Burbank, California, United States
Investigator Site
San Diego, California, United States
Investigator Site
Miami, Florida, United States
Investigator Site
Martinez, Georgia, United States
Investigator Site
Stockbridge, Georgia, United States
Investigator Site
Clinton Township, Michigan, United States
Investigator Site
Hickory, North Carolina, United States
Investigator Site
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Investigator Site
Salisbury, North Carolina, United States
Investigator Site
Sylvania, Ohio, United States
Investigator Site
Simpsonville, South Carolina, United States
Investigator Site
Bristol, Tennessee, United States
Investigator Site
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Investigator Site
College Station, Texas, United States
Investigator Site
Houston, Texas, United States
Investigator Site
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Investigator Site
Belize City, Belize
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Director
- Organization
- Taro Pharmaceuticals
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 30, 2009
First Posted
February 3, 2009
Study Start
June 1, 2008
Primary Completion
October 1, 2008
Study Completion
December 1, 2008
Last Updated
February 4, 2014
Results First Posted
October 6, 2009
Record last verified: 2014-01