CONFIRM - Comparison of in Office Interrogation Versus Remote Measurements
CONFIRM
Comparison of in Office Interrogation vs. Remote Measurements
1 other identifier
observational
115
1 country
6
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the automated data collection in the Zephyr device as compared to manual testing results for atrial and ventricular pacing thresholds. The secondary objectives include: to compare the in-clinic time needed to retrieve and document the automated device measurements for all tests to the additional time needed to manually measure sensing, impedance and thresholds for the same patient; to compare the accuracy of the automated device test results to manual testing results; evaluate the percentage of patients who are recommended for ACapTM Confirm utilization. The Primary Hypotheses are:
- 1.The values reported from ACapTM Confirm will be within 0.125 V of the value that is obtained manually in clinic.
- 2.The values reported from VentricularAutoCaptureTM will be within 0.125 V of the value that is obtained manually in clinic.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Oct 2008
Longer than P75 for all trials
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 29, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 30, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2013
CompletedFebruary 4, 2019
February 1, 2019
4.3 years
January 29, 2009
February 1, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Efficacy of the automated data collection as compared to manual testing results for atrial and ventricular pacing thresholds
12 and 18 months post-implant
Secondary Outcomes (1)
To compare the in-clinic time needed to retrieve and document the automated device measurements for all tests to the additional time needed to manually measure sensing, impedance and thresholds for the same patient.
12 and 18 months post-implant
Study Arms (1)
Pacemaker patients
Patients who are implanted with a SJM Zephyr™ DR device for a standard pacing indication will be eligible
Interventions
The testing algorithms allow the device to display threshold measurements at time of device interrogation. These will be evaluated against manual testing results.
Eligibility Criteria
primary device clinic
You may qualify if:
- Patients have been implanted with their device \~ 6 months prior
- Patients must have their device evaluated at the enrolling center.
- Patients must be able to comply with the regular routine follow-up schedule of the enrolling clinic.
- Patients must be able and willing to provide written informed consent to participate in the clinical trial.
- Patients age 18 or greater.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient has a unipolar atrial lead implanted.
- Patients who are or may potentially be pregnant.
- Patients with persistent AF.
- Less than 1 year life expectancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (6)
Kelowna General Hospital
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
North Shore Heart Group
Vancouver, British Columbia, V7L2P7, Canada
William Osler Health Centre
Brampton, Ontario, L6R 3J7, Canada
Peterborough Regional
Peterborough, Ontario, Canada
Clinique de Cardiologie Desilets
Québec, Quebec, G1J 1Z6, Canada
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec
Québec, Quebec, G1R 2J6, Canada
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CROSSOVER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 29, 2009
First Posted
January 30, 2009
Study Start
October 1, 2008
Primary Completion
February 1, 2013
Study Completion
February 1, 2013
Last Updated
February 4, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02