A Four-Arm Study Comparing the Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Tramadol Once a Day 100, 200 and 300 mg Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Pain Due to Osteoarthritis of the Knee
2 other identifiers
interventional
565
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of Tramadol Once a Day 100, 200, 300 mg and Placebo
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 pain
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2003
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2003
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 29, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 30, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 3, 2009
CompletedApril 30, 2012
April 1, 2012
7 months
January 29, 2009
April 8, 2009
April 25, 2012
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Patient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)
3-item Likert-scale: "How do you rate overall pain relief with the drug?" with 3 possible answers: "very effective", "effective", or "ineffective". The average of ratings at visits 2-5 was calculated as median, rounded up to the closest integer.
12 weeks
Percentage Difference Between WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)
Percentage of difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale score between baseline and week 12. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales, using a 100mm visual analog scale ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm). The WOMAC Pain Subscale results from the sum of 5 questions.
Baseline to week 12
Percentage Difference Between WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)
Percentage of difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale score between baseline and week 12. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales, using a 100mm visual analog scale ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm). The WOMAC Physical Function subscale results from the sum of 17 questions.
Baseline to week 12
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Percentage Difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)
Week 0, week 3, week 6
Percentage Difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)
Week 0, week 3, week 6
Multiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain Questionnaire
12 weeks
Investigator Global Rating of Pain Relief
12 weeks
Percentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout Reason
12 weeks
Study Arms (4)
1 Tramadol Once A Day 100mg
EXPERIMENTAL2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mg
EXPERIMENTAL3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mg
EXPERIMENTAL4: Placebo
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
One Tramadol Once A Day tablet at randomized dose daily.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males or Females between the ages of 40-75 with a diagnosis of moderate to severe osteoarthritis of the knee, consistent with the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Clinical Classification Criteria for Arthritis of the Knee:
- Current knee pain
- Less than 30 minutes of morning stiffness with or without crepitus on active motion.
- Confirmation either by arthroscopy or radiologist's report (X-rays showing osteophytes, joint space narrowing or subchondral bone sclerosis {eburnation}) within five years prior to entry into the study.
- C-reactive protein (CRP) \< 8 ug/ml (if available at local lab) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) \< 40 mm/hr
- Total WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index) Pain Subscale Score of \> 150 mm at Baseline corresponding with moderate to severe Osteoarthritis.
- Oral and written language comprehension at a level sufficient to comply with the protocol and complete study-related materials.
- Research Ethics Board (REB) approval of the written Informed Consent Form in Spanish or English which was signed and dated by the patient and Investigator, prior to study participation.
You may not qualify if:
- Known rheumatoid arthritis or any other rheumatoid disease.
- Secondary arthritis i.e. any of the following: septic arthritis; inflammatory joint disease; gout; pseudogout; Paget's disease; joint fracture; acromegaly; fibromyalgia; Wilson's disease; ochronosis; haemochromatosis; osteochondromatosis; or collagen gene mutations.
- Evidence of effusion greater than 15 cubic centimetre (cc) upon physical examination of the joint at Baseline (Visit 1).
- Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 38.
- Major illness, requiring hospitalization during the 3 months before commencement of the screening period.
- The patient was unwilling to stop taking pain medication (for arthritis or other types of pain) or was unwilling to stop taking other medications for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA).
- Previous failure or discontinuation (due to adverse events) of tramadol hydrochloride (HCl) therapy.
- Treatment within the last 3 weeks with any of the following medications: monoamine oxidase inhibitors; tricyclic antidepressants and other tricyclic compounds (e.g. cyclobenzaprine, promethazine); neuroleptics; selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; or any other drug that reduces seizure threshold.
- Treatment with another investigational agent within the last 30 days.
- A history of seizure disorder other than Infantile Febrile Seizures.
- Previous or current opioid dependency.
- Bowel disease causing malabsorption.
- Pregnancy or lactating or childbearing potential and unwilling to utilize a medically approved method of contraception during participation in this clinical trial.
- Significant liver disease, defined as active hepatitis or elevated liver enzymes \>3 times the upper boundary of the normal range.
- Significant renal disease, defined as creatinine clearance \<30 mL/min as estimated by the method of Levey et al., 1999.
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Labopharm Inc.lead
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director of Regulatory Affairs
- Organization
- Labopharm Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 29, 2009
First Posted
January 30, 2009
Study Start
January 1, 2003
Primary Completion
August 1, 2003
Last Updated
April 30, 2012
Results First Posted
August 3, 2009
Record last verified: 2012-04