Medical Expulsive Therapy of Single Distal Ureteral Stones
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Current therapeutic options for ureteral stones include active intervention as well as conservative "watch and wait" approaches. Endoscopic treatment of ureteral stones has a high success rate and reliably results in immediate stone removal However, surgical as well as anaesthetic risks are not negligible and serious complications are possible. For many patients, a conservative treatment is an appealing option. Watchful waiting, however, not always results in stone clearance and may be associated with recurrent renal colics. The therapeutic potential of alpha-blockers for ureteral stone disease has been investigated prompted by the detection of alpha-receptors in ureteral smooth muscle cells. Blocking of such receptors, which are predominantly located in the distal part of the ureter results in relaxation of the ureteral wall and modulation of peristaltic activity. This mechanism has been proposed to facilitate stone passage for ureteral calculi. Numerous clinical trials have revealed a significant improvement of the stone expulsion rate using the alpha-blocker tamsulosin. Most of these studies were randomised but none were performed in a double-blind and placebo-controlled fashion. Therefore, the objective of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy of medical expulsive therapy with tamsulosin in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled setting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2006
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 19, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 29, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 12, 2010
CompletedMay 25, 2010
May 1, 2010
2.2 years
November 19, 2008
January 11, 2010
May 19, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Stone Expulsion
The primary end point was the number of patients per group experiencing stone expulsion until day 21, as confirmed by low-dose abdominal computed tomography (CT).
21 days
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Time to Stone Passage
21 days
Required Analgesics
Until stone expulsion or up to 21 days
Maximum Daily Pain Score
Until stone expulsion or up to 21 days
Number of Participants Requiring Active Treatment
21 days
Study Arms (2)
Tamsulosin
ACTIVE COMPARATORTamsulosin treatment
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo treatment
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients with a single 2 to 7mm ureteral stone below the common iliac vessels
You may not qualify if:
- presence of multiple ureteral stones
- renal insufficiency (glomerular filtration rate below 60 ml/min)
- urinary tract infection
- a solitary kidney
- pregnancy
- history of ureteral surgery or previous endoscopic procedure
- hypersensitivity to tamsulosin
- current alpha-blocker, calcium-antagonist or corticosteroid medication
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Urology, University Hospital Zürich, Switzerland
Zurich, 8091, Switzerland
Related Publications (1)
Hermanns T, Sauermann P, Rufibach K, Frauenfelder T, Sulser T, Strebel RT. Is there a role for tamsulosin in the treatment of distal ureteral stones of 7 mm or less? Results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2009 Sep;56(3):407-12. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.076. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
PMID: 19375849DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Not all patients were able to record the exact time of stone passage. Thus, the secondary end point of time to stone passage is based on Kaplan-Meier estimation.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Räto T. Strebel
- Organization
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zürich, Switzerland
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
01 Studienregister MasterAdmins
UniversitaetsSpital Zuerich
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 19, 2008
First Posted
January 29, 2009
Study Start
September 1, 2006
Primary Completion
November 1, 2008
Study Completion
November 1, 2008
Last Updated
May 25, 2010
Results First Posted
May 12, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-05