Effects of Carotid Stent Design on Cerebral Embolization
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of the proposed study is to contrast the relative efficacy of closed-cell stents versus open-cell stents in preventing periprocedural cerebral embolization in high-risk patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable stroke
Started Dec 2008
Typical duration for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 26, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 27, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 27, 2014
CompletedFebruary 5, 2020
January 1, 2020
3 years
January 26, 2009
March 8, 2013
January 27, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Transcranial Doppler Counts of Micro-embolic Signals in the Ipsilateral Middle Cerebral Artery.
Bilateral transcranial Doppler scan monitoring of the anterior and middle cerebral arteries was performed using a PMD150-ST3 digital transcranial Doppler pulsed-wave ultrasound scan system (Spencer Technologies, Seattle, Wash) with 2-MHz probes located over the temporal bones above the zygomatic arch. Isolated microembolic signals (MES) were identified from Doppler spectras according to the criteria given by the Consensus Committee of the Ninth International Cerebral Hemodynamic Symposium. If the number of MES was too high to be counted separately, heartbeats with microemboli were counted as microembolic showers. To avoid confusion, MES detected during contrast injection were excluded from the analysis. For analysis purposes, the procedure was divided into the following phases: lesion crossing, filter deployment, IVUS examination, predilation, stent deployment, postdilatation (when applicable), and filter removal.
First 24 hours after implantation of carotid stent
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Composite of Any Stroke, Myocardial Infarction or Death
within 30 days after the carotid stenting procedure
Subclinical Cerebral Embolization Assessed by Brain Diffusion-weighted MRI
within 24 hours after carotid artery stenting
Study Arms (2)
Closed-cell stent (Xact stent)
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor patients randomized to the closed-cell stent group, the Xact closed-cell stents were used. The Xact stent is a FDA approved device.
Open-cell stent (Acculink carotid)
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor patients randomized to the open-cell stent group, the Acculink carotid stent was used. The Acculink stent is a FDA approved device.
Interventions
Patients enrolled in this study arm underwent for carotid stenting using closed stent cell. The graft used in this groups was the Xact closed-cell stent. This type of device is rigid device with dense conposition of the nitinol rigns. Carotid stenting was used on standard fashion using filters as embolic protection device.
Patients enrolled in this study arm underwent for carotid stenting using open stent cell stents. This type of stent is a tube shaped graft composed of flexible nitinol rings. The device used in this group was the Acculinx open-cell stent. Stenting procedure eas performed on standard fashion.Filters were used as embolic protection device.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject is at high risk for carotid endarterectomy due to either anatomic or co-morbid conditions; AND
- Symptomatic patients (TIA or non-disabling stroke within 6 months of the procedure), with carotid stenosis ≥ 50% as diagnosed by angiography, using NASCET methodology (50); OR
- Asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis ≥ 80% as diagnosed by angiography, using NASCET methodology
You may not qualify if:
- Conditions that interfere with the evaluation of endpoints
- Subject has anticipated or potential sources of cardiac emboli
- Subject plans to have a major surgical procedure within 30 days after the index procedure.
- Subject has intracranial pathology that makes the subject inappropriate for study participation.
- Subject has a total occlusion of the ipsilateral carotid artery (i.e., CCA).
- Severe circumferential lesion calcification that may restrict the full deployment of the carotid stent.
- Carotid stenosis located distal to the target stenosis that is more severe than the target stenosis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dallas VA Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75216, United States
Related Publications (1)
Timaran CH, Rosero EB, Higuera A, Ilarraza A, Modrall JG, Clagett GP. Randomized clinical trial of open-cell vs closed-cell stents for carotid stenting and effects of stent design on cerebral embolization. J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1310-1316.e1; discussion 1316. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.05.013. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
PMID: 21723064DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
1\. Small sample size 2.randomization did not eliminate all pretreatment differences between groups because of the small sample size.3.All patients underwent Stenting under filter embolic protection.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Carlos H Timaran
- Organization
- Dallas VA Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Carlos H Timaran, MD
Dallas VA Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgeon
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 26, 2009
First Posted
January 27, 2009
Study Start
December 1, 2008
Primary Completion
December 1, 2011
Study Completion
February 1, 2012
Last Updated
February 5, 2020
Results First Posted
March 27, 2014
Record last verified: 2020-01