NCT00830232

Brief Summary

The goal of the proposed study is to contrast the relative efficacy of closed-cell stents versus open-cell stents in preventing periprocedural cerebral embolization in high-risk patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2008

Typical duration for not_applicable stroke

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2008

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 26, 2009

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 27, 2009

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2011

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2012

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 27, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

February 5, 2020

Status Verified

January 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

January 26, 2009

Results QC Date

March 8, 2013

Last Update Submit

January 27, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

StrokeCarotid stenosisstents

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Transcranial Doppler Counts of Micro-embolic Signals in the Ipsilateral Middle Cerebral Artery.

    Bilateral transcranial Doppler scan monitoring of the anterior and middle cerebral arteries was performed using a PMD150-ST3 digital transcranial Doppler pulsed-wave ultrasound scan system (Spencer Technologies, Seattle, Wash) with 2-MHz probes located over the temporal bones above the zygomatic arch. Isolated microembolic signals (MES) were identified from Doppler spectras according to the criteria given by the Consensus Committee of the Ninth International Cerebral Hemodynamic Symposium. If the number of MES was too high to be counted separately, heartbeats with microemboli were counted as microembolic showers. To avoid confusion, MES detected during contrast injection were excluded from the analysis. For analysis purposes, the procedure was divided into the following phases: lesion crossing, filter deployment, IVUS examination, predilation, stent deployment, postdilatation (when applicable), and filter removal.

    First 24 hours after implantation of carotid stent

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Composite of Any Stroke, Myocardial Infarction or Death

    within 30 days after the carotid stenting procedure

  • Subclinical Cerebral Embolization Assessed by Brain Diffusion-weighted MRI

    within 24 hours after carotid artery stenting

Study Arms (2)

Closed-cell stent (Xact stent)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

For patients randomized to the closed-cell stent group, the Xact closed-cell stents were used. The Xact stent is a FDA approved device.

Device: closed-cell stent (Xact stent)

Open-cell stent (Acculink carotid)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

For patients randomized to the open-cell stent group, the Acculink carotid stent was used. The Acculink stent is a FDA approved device.

Device: Open-cell stent (Acculink carotid)

Interventions

Patients enrolled in this study arm underwent for carotid stenting using closed stent cell. The graft used in this groups was the Xact closed-cell stent. This type of device is rigid device with dense conposition of the nitinol rigns. Carotid stenting was used on standard fashion using filters as embolic protection device.

Also known as: Carotid artery angioplasty
Closed-cell stent (Xact stent)

Patients enrolled in this study arm underwent for carotid stenting using open stent cell stents. This type of stent is a tube shaped graft composed of flexible nitinol rings. The device used in this group was the Acculinx open-cell stent. Stenting procedure eas performed on standard fashion.Filters were used as embolic protection device.

Also known as: Carotid artery angioplasty
Open-cell stent (Acculink carotid)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subject is at high risk for carotid endarterectomy due to either anatomic or co-morbid conditions; AND
  • Symptomatic patients (TIA or non-disabling stroke within 6 months of the procedure), with carotid stenosis ≥ 50% as diagnosed by angiography, using NASCET methodology (50); OR
  • Asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis ≥ 80% as diagnosed by angiography, using NASCET methodology

You may not qualify if:

  • Conditions that interfere with the evaluation of endpoints
  • Subject has anticipated or potential sources of cardiac emboli
  • Subject plans to have a major surgical procedure within 30 days after the index procedure.
  • Subject has intracranial pathology that makes the subject inappropriate for study participation.
  • Subject has a total occlusion of the ipsilateral carotid artery (i.e., CCA).
  • Severe circumferential lesion calcification that may restrict the full deployment of the carotid stent.
  • Carotid stenosis located distal to the target stenosis that is more severe than the target stenosis.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Dallas VA Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, 75216, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Timaran CH, Rosero EB, Higuera A, Ilarraza A, Modrall JG, Clagett GP. Randomized clinical trial of open-cell vs closed-cell stents for carotid stenting and effects of stent design on cerebral embolization. J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1310-1316.e1; discussion 1316. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.05.013. Epub 2011 Jul 1.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

StrokeCarotid Stenosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesCarotid Artery DiseasesArterial Occlusive Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

1\. Small sample size 2.randomization did not eliminate all pretreatment differences between groups because of the small sample size.3.All patients underwent Stenting under filter embolic protection.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Carlos H Timaran
Organization
Dallas VA Medical Center

Study Officials

  • Carlos H Timaran, MD

    Dallas VA Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Vascular and Endovascular Surgeon

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2009

First Posted

January 27, 2009

Study Start

December 1, 2008

Primary Completion

December 1, 2011

Study Completion

February 1, 2012

Last Updated

February 5, 2020

Results First Posted

March 27, 2014

Record last verified: 2020-01

Locations