NCT00829413

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the Sensitivity and Specificity of SonoVue®-enhanced ultrasound is superior to that of unenhanced ultrasound for the characterization of benign versus malignant FLLs using final diagnosis based on histology or combined imaging (CE-CT and/or CE MRI)/clinical data as truth standard.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
353

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2010

Typical duration for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 26, 2009

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 27, 2009

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2010

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2013

Completed
5.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 3, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

August 3, 2018

Status Verified

November 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

January 26, 2009

Results QC Date

September 28, 2016

Last Update Submit

July 5, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Sensitivity: Percentage of True Positive Lesions Among All Malignant Lesions Per Truth Standard

    Sensitivity of SonoVue-enhanced ultrasound (SonoVue CE-US) versus unenhanced ultrasound (UE-US) for characterization of malignant focal liver lesions (FLLs) using the diagnosis provided by each of the 3 off-site assessors (blinded to patient data) for the Intent-to-diagnose (ITD) population. Unit of analysis was the lesion, equivalent to subject, since each subject had a single lesion to be characterized. True positive: subject with a target lesion characterized as malignant by both ultrasonography and the truth standard. Truth standard: CE-CT and/or CE-MRI examination OR tissue pathology/histology from surgical resection/biopsy OR 6-month follow up Calculated as (number of true positive lesions/number of malignant lesions per truth standard) x 100

    24 hours to 6 months

  • Specificity: Percentage of True Negative Lesions Among All Benign Lesions Per Truth Standard'

    Specificity of SonoVue-enhanced versus unenhanced ultrasound for characterization of benign FLLs, using the diagnosis provided by each of the 3 off-site assessors (blinded to patient data) for the ITD population. Unit of analysis was the lesion, equivalent to the subject, since each subject had a single lesion that was to be characterized. True negative: subject with a target lesion characterized as benign by both ultrasonography and truth standard. Among the 259 ITD participants, only 140 participants (lesions) were benign based on the truth standard. Truth standard: CE-CT and /or CE-MRI examination OR tissue pathology/histology from surgical resection/biopsy OR 6-month follow up. Calculated as (number of true negative lesions/number of benign lesions per truth standard) x 100.

    24 hours to 6 months

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Accuracy: Percentage of True Positive and True Negative Among All Lesions

    24 hours to 6 months

  • Positive Predictive Value [PPV]: Percentage of True Positive Lesions Among All Malignant Lesions Per Ultrasound

    24 hours to 6 months

  • Negative Predictive Value [NPV]: Percentage of True Negative Lesions Among All Benign Lesions Per Ultrasound

    24 hours to 6 months

  • Specific Diagnosis of Malignant FLLs

    24 hours to 6 months

  • Specific Diagnosis of Benign FLLs

    24 hours to 6 months

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Patients who received SonoVue

OTHER

Patients with at least one target lesions requiring work-up for characterization to undergo * Unenhanced ultrasound of the target lesion (UE-US): gray scale and Doppler (color or power imaging) ultrasound investigations of the target lesion using commercially available ultrasound equipment and standard techniques (B-mode or Harmonic imaging) to study the anatomy of the target lesion and surrounding parenchyma; * SonoVue-enhanced ultrasound of the target lesion (CE-US):procedures described in protocol Section 7.5.1.2, to study the lesion vascularity in comparison to the surrounding parenchyma; and * Truth standard 2.4 mL of sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles (SonoVue®) will be administered as a bolus injection in a peripheral vein.

Drug: SonoVue®

Interventions

SonoVue (2.4 mL)

Also known as: sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles
Patients who received SonoVue

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male/female.
  • Provides written Informed Consent and is willing to comply with protocol requirements.
  • Is at least 18 years of age.
  • Has at least 1 FLL (target lesion) requiring work-up for characterization. Target lesions may include those:
  • Incidentally detected, In subjects with chronic hepatitis or liver cirrhosis, In subjects with known history of malignancy.
  • Is scheduled for surgical removal or biopsy of the target lesion from 24 hours to 30 days after the SonoVue® administration OR
  • In case tissue biopsy is not indicated nor surgery planned, is scheduled for or has performed a CE-CT and/or CE-MRI of the target lesion from 30 days to 48 hours prior to or from 24 hours to 30 days after the administration of SonoVue®.

You may not qualify if:

  • Has an acoustic window insufficient for adequate ultrasound examination of the liver.
  • Has a FLL that cannot be identified with unenhanced ultrasound.
  • Has received or is scheduled for antineoplastic chemotherapy or an invasive procedure in the time period between test procedures and truth standard assessments which may have modified the target lesion.
  • Is receiving any other contrast medium, within the 48 hours before and up to 24 hours following the administration of SonoVue®.
  • Has previously been enrolled in and completed this study.
  • Known right to left cardiac shunt, bidirectional or transient.
  • Has any known allergy to 1 or more of the ingredients of the investigational product (sulfur hexafluoride or to any components of SonoVue®).
  • Has any contraindication to 1 of the planned imaging procedures (ultrasound, CT or MRI), e.g., implants, claustrophobia, inadequate medical conditions etc.
  • Has received an investigational compound within 30 days before admission into this study.
  • Has any medical condition or other circumstances which would significantly decrease the chances of obtaining reliable data, achieving study objectives, or completing the study and/or post-dose follow-up examinations.
  • Is determined by the Investigator that the subject is clinically unsuitable for the study.
  • Is a pregnant or lactating female. Exclude the possibility of pregnancy by:
  • testing on site at the institution serum βHCG within 24 hours prior to the start of SonoVue® administration, surgical history (e.g., tubal ligation or hysterectomy), post menopausal with a minimum 1 year without menses.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Bracco Diagnostics Inc.

Princeton, New Jersey, 08540, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Liver Neoplasms

Interventions

contrast agent BR1

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Digestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesLiver Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Maria Luigia Storto, MD Executive Director X-Ray and Ultrasound Medical Affairs
Organization
Bracco Diagnostics Inc.

Study Officials

  • Alberto Spinazzi, M.D.

    Bracco Diagnostics, Inc

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2009

First Posted

January 27, 2009

Study Start

June 1, 2010

Primary Completion

July 1, 2013

Study Completion

July 1, 2013

Last Updated

August 3, 2018

Results First Posted

August 3, 2018

Record last verified: 2017-11

Locations