Ulnar Nerve Block for Procedural Anesthesia - Wrist Versus Palm
1 other identifier
interventional
127
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Ulnar nerve blockade is necessary for sensory anesthesia and analgesia in the hand during minor procedures. The course of the ulnar nerve in the forearm, wrist, and hand is predictable and has low variability. However even with known anatomic location and landmarks, ulnar nerve blocks at the wrist frequently are inadequate for procedural anesthesia. The antebrachial fascia at the wrist acts as a barrier to local infiltration. Since the fascia can not be visualized or palpated, it is commonly not penetrated, resulting in an inadequate block. Furthermore at the level of the wrist the ulnar artery lies in close proximity to the nerve and there is potential for arterial puncture while attempting injection for volar wrist block. The palmar ulnar nerve block is an injection distal to the hook of the hamate in the thenar eminence which avoids the ulnar artery and antebrachial fascia. This block has been used successfully for many years in clinical practice but has not been assessed or compared in a research study. The purpose of this study is to assess the validity of using a palmar ulnar nerve block for procedures in the hand as compared to the standard volar wrist ulnar nerve block.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2008
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 21, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 23, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2009
CompletedMay 14, 2018
May 1, 2018
1.4 years
January 21, 2009
May 8, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Primary outcome is efficacy of sensory anesthesia and analgesia
15-45 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Secondary outcome is patient perceived discomfort with block
15-45 Minutes
Study Arms (2)
Hypothenar Palm block
ACTIVE COMPARATORHypothenar Palmar block group. Local anesthetic is placed at this location in this study group. The same local composition (Intervention) is used for both study groups. The trial is a comparison of location not the Intervention.
Volar Wrist Block
ACTIVE COMPARATORVolar Wrist block group. Local anesthetic is placed at this location in this study group. The same local composition (Intervention) is used for both study groups. The trial is a comparison of location not the Intervention.
Interventions
Injection medial to Flexor Carpi Ulnaris Tendon at volar proximal wrist crease Local Block - total 3 cc injection (1.5 cc 1% plain lidocaine and 1.5 cc of 0.25% bupivicaine)
Injection at Hook of the Hamate on Palmar surface Local Block - total 3 cc injection (1.5 cc 1% plain lidocaine and 1.5 cc of 0.25% bupivicaine)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- any individual who can give informed consent and is scheduled for elective hand procedures by the PI necessitating an Ulnar nerve block of the hand.
You may not qualify if:
- patients unable to give informed consent
- patients with previous or ongoing ulnar nerve deficits or neuropathy
- patients undergoing Guyon's canal decompression
- patients who can not comprehend or cooperate with assessment testing
- patients with abnormal two point discrimination (\> 6 mm at the test location) prior to the nerve block
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hamilton Health Sciences Corporationlead
- McMaster Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hamilton General Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stuart Martin
McMaster University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 21, 2009
First Posted
January 23, 2009
Study Start
February 1, 2008
Primary Completion
July 1, 2009
Study Completion
July 1, 2009
Last Updated
May 14, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05