A Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of the ExcelTM Sirolimus Eluting Stent With a Biodegradable Polymer Versus Sirolimus Eluting Stent With Non-Biodegradable Polymer in the Treatment of Patients With de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions
EVOLUTION
A Randomized Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of the ExcelTM Sirolimus Eluting Stent With a Biodegradable Polymer Versus SirOlimus ELUting Stent With Non-Biodegradable Polymer in the Treatment of PatIents With de nOvo Coronary Artery LesioNs
2 other identifiers
interventional
1,944
1 country
1
Brief Summary
E.V.O.L.U.T.I.O.N.: A Randomized Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of the Excel Sirolimus Eluting Stent with a Biodegradable Polymer Versus Sirolimus Eluting Stent with a Non-Biodegradable Polymer in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Coronary Artery Lesions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Oct 2008
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 19, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 21, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2014
CompletedJanuary 26, 2009
January 1, 2009
1.5 years
January 19, 2009
January 22, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Ischemia-driven Target Vessel Failure which is a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (Q and non-Q wave) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 12 months.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Rates of stent thrombosis
5 years
Rates for each component of the TLF composite endpoint at 12 months post-procedure
5 years
Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) at 30 days, 6 months, 12 months and 2 to 5 years annually
5 years
Study Arms (2)
Excel
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will be randomly assigned (2:1) to one of two treatment arms (the Excel DES or the Cypher DES). Randomization will be stratified by study site and number of vessels intended to be treated by the site investigator. Randomization will be accomplished through use of envelope randomization at the sites using the pre-assigned envelope randomization system. The study patient is considered enrolled upon randomization.
Cypher
SHAM COMPARATORPatients will be randomly assigned (2:1) to one of two treatment arms (the Excel DES or the Cypher DES). Randomization will be stratified by study site and number of vessels intended to be treated by the site investigator. Randomization will be accomplished through use of envelope randomization at the sites using the pre-assigned envelope randomization system. The study patient is considered enrolled upon randomization.
Interventions
Patients will be randomly assigned (2:1) to one of two treatment arms (the Excel DES or the Cypher DES). Randomization will be stratified by study site and number of vessels intended to be treated by the site investigator. Randomization will be accomplished through use of envelope randomization at the sites using the pre-assigned envelope randomization system. The study patient is considered enrolled upon randomization.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient \> 18 years of age.
- Diagnosis of stable angina, unstable angina or silent ischemia (evidence of myocardial ischemia).
- Positive functional study or reversible change in the electrocardiogram (ECG) consistent with ischemia.
- Patient must be an acceptable candidate for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.
- Patient must agree to undergo all required follow-up exam- inations.
- Presence of one or more de novo coronary artery stenosis \> 50% in native coronary arteries that corresponds with the evidence of ischemia. NOTE: In the presence of multiple de novo coronary lesions a maximum of four (4) planned Excel or Cypher stents may be used.
- The target lesion(s) must be \< 24mm in length and the reference diameter is \> 2.5 mm and \< 3.75 mm (visual estimate).
You may not qualify if:
- Patient is pregnant or breast feeding.
- Patient is allergic or has a contraindication to aspirin, clopidogrel and ticlopidine, heparin and bivalirudin, stainless steel, PLA, contrast media (that can not be adequately pre- medicated), and sirolimus (or its analogues).
- Patient has evidence of an Acute Myocardial Infarction evidenced by elevation of CK/CK-MB or Troponin per clinical site standards, within 72 hours of the index procedure.
- Patient is unable to provide informed consent.
- Patient is participating in another device or drug study that has not reached the primary endpoint of the study.
- Patient is considered for a DES other than the Excel or the Cypher stents.
- Patient has a co-morbid condition(s) that could limit the patient's ability to participate in the study, comply with follow- up requirements and impact the scientific integrity of the study.
- Patient has undergone previous stenting anywhere within the target vessel(s) within the previous 12 months, or will require stenting within the target vessel(s) within 12 months after the study procedure, or has received coronary brachytherapy at anytime.
- Heavily calcified target lesion(s) which cannot be successfully pre-dilated.
- Target lesion(s) involves a side branch \>2.5 mm in diameter, or \< 2.5 mm in diameter requiring treatment.
- Patient has an unprotected Left Main Coronary Lesion with a diameter of \>= 50%.
- Anticipated use of rotoblator or cutting balloon on target lesion(s).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
JW Medical Systems
Beijing, 100037, China
Related Publications (1)
Salam AM, Al Suwaidi J, Holmes DR Jr. Drug-eluting coronary stents. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2006 Jan;31(1):8-119. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2005.09.002.
PMID: 16389102BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 19, 2009
First Posted
January 21, 2009
Study Start
October 1, 2008
Primary Completion
April 1, 2010
Study Completion
April 1, 2014
Last Updated
January 26, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-01