NCT00825422

Brief Summary

Posterior lumbar arthrodesis causes severe postoperative pain, hampering patients's postoperative reconvalescence especially functional rehabilitation. Efficient and safe methods for postoperative analgesia are, therefore, mandatory. The application of opioids are the most frequently used therapies for postoperative pain relief but it very often results side effects. Local anesthetic wound infiltration is widely recognized as a useful adjunct in a multimodal approach to postoperative pain management. In the setting of spine surgery, a single bolus administration of a local anesthetic is a useful method (with a reduction in parenteral morphine consumption during the 48 first hours) but has a limited effect because of its short duration of action. Prolonged administration through a multi-holed catheter positioned by the surgeon at the end of the procedure could increase the duration of action and may thereby improve the efficacy of local wound infiltration. Easy and effective, this new modality of administration has expanded the indications for parietal infiltrations toward major painful procedures. We designed this study to determine whether local anesthetic (compared with saline solution) continuous wound infiltration during the first two days after posterior lumbar arthrodesis on degenerative spine, could improve postoperative analgesia at short-term but particularly at mid-term (two months) and long-term (six months), in order to decrease postoperative lumbar pains (resulting in best life quality, opioid consumption limited and rehabilitation hastened) and postoperative hyperalgesia areas. The postoperative analgesic and antihyperalgesic efficacies; the postoperative rehabilitation at mid-term and long term, and the safety of opioid administration and multi-holed parietal catheter will be compared in the two groups (control and study).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2009

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2009

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 19, 2009

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 21, 2009

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2010

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

June 20, 2012

Status Verified

June 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

January 19, 2009

Last Update Submit

June 19, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

Posterior lumbar arthrodesisDegenerative spinePostoperative analgesiaLocal anesthesicContinuous wound infusion catheterPainlumbar vertebraeSpinal fusion

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Postoperative pain score : Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Two months after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Blood dosages of total ropivacaine

    Peroperative

  • Clinical tolerances of catheter

    until 5 days after surgery

  • Pain score :visual analog scale (VAS)

    24h, 48h, 5 days, 2 and 6 months after surgery

  • Static hyperalgesia using von Frey filaments

    48h, 5 days, 2 and 6 months after surgery

  • Postoperative rehabilitation neuropathic pain

    2 and 6 months after surgery

Study Arms (2)

A

EXPERIMENTAL

first bolus of 20 ml of ropivacaine(5mg/ml) and continuous infiltration (8ml/h)of ropivacaine (2mg/ml)

Drug: Ropivacaine / Placebo

B

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

first bolus of 20 ml of physiological saline solution(9%) and continuous infiltration (8ml/h)of physiological saline solution(9%)

Drug: Ropivacaine / Placebo

Interventions

Wound infiltration with local anesthesics/placebo through a parietal paravertebral catheter

AB

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Necessity to use safety contraceptive methods for women who can procreate
  • Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I, II or III
  • Patients scheduled to undergo a posterior lumbar arthrodesis on one at three levels treated,
  • Posterior lumbar arthrodesis is only executed on lumbar degenerative spine,
  • A written informed consent has to sign by the patient and the investigator before beginning clinical study
  • Patients affiliated with social security system

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnancy and breast-feeding
  • Posterior lumbar arthrodesis exceeding three levels treated,
  • Posterior lumbar arthrodesis post-traumatic or with neoplastic disorders or with the aim of correcting cord compression,
  • Epilepsy not controlled through medication,
  • Preoperative cognitive dysfunction or psychiatric disorders,
  • Cardiac or breathing dysfunctions,
  • Preoperative opioid consumption,
  • Patients who have a known local anesthetic, or morphine or/and acetaminophen allergy,
  • Lack of understanding about the study or inability to use the patient controlled analgesic device,
  • Patients protected by the law, guardianship,
  • Patients who take a share in an another clinical study in the same time,

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospital

Bordeaux, 33076, France

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

HyperalgesiaPain

Interventions

Ropivacaine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Somatosensory DisordersSensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAmines

Study Officials

  • Geneviève CHENE, Professor

    University Hospital, Bordeaux

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Cécile DEGRYSE, MD

    Univestity Hospital, Bordeaux

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2009

First Posted

January 21, 2009

Study Start

January 1, 2009

Primary Completion

April 1, 2010

Study Completion

August 1, 2010

Last Updated

June 20, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-06

Locations