Detection and Classification of Colon Polyps
1 other identifier
interventional
110
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Colon cancer is the third most common cancer in western society. To prevent colon cancer it is recommended for people to undergo a screening colonoscopy at the age of fifty. The purpose of the colonoscopy is to remove polyps, since some of these lesions are precancerous. Precancerous polyps are called adenomas. This method of prevention is effective, but the standard colonoscopy currently used does not detect all polyps. Studies have reported a polyp miss rate of about 24%. Furthermore, we are unable to distinguish precancerous polyps from benign polyps, also known as hyperplastic polyps, with standard colonoscopy. This results in all polyps being removed at time of colonoscopy, even the benign polyps. To help improve the detection of colon polyps new endoscopic technologies have been developed. These technologies include high definition white light (HDWL)and high definition narrow band imaging (HDNBI). HDWL improves the overall resolution of the images seen during colonoscopy. HDNBI can help us better classify polyps by enhancing their tissue appearance as well as seeing small blood vessels and capillaries. The goal of this study to determine if HDNBI imaging shows an increased polyp detection rate when compared to the current standard colonoscopy. In addition to develop a classification system to help better differentiate between precancerous polyps and their benign counterparts using HDWL and HDNBI.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Jul 2006
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 26, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 21, 2009
CompletedJanuary 21, 2009
January 1, 2009
2.4 years
December 26, 2007
January 20, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
1. Compare the miss rate of standard white light imaging compared to NBI for detection of colon polyps with NBI
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
2. Estimate the accuracy of standard white light, HDWL and HDNBI imaging modes for the classification of adenomatous (premalignant) versus non-adenomatous (hyperplastic, inflammatory, normal) polyps.
2 years
Study Arms (2)
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORHDNBI colonoscopy followed by standard white light colonoscopy
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORstandard white light colonoscopy followed by HDNBI colonoscopy
Interventions
Identify polyp during colonoscopy then remove polyp
ETMI colonoscope used to identify colon polyps as compared to HD white light colonoscope identifying colon polyps.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years or older.
- Informed written consent
You may not qualify if:
- History of inflammatory bowel disease.
- Patients with severe cardiopulmonary disease precluding colonoscopy.
- Presence of conditions not allowing for polypectomy or biopsy (e.g. coagulation disorder).
- Known familial polyposis syndrome (FAP, HNPCC, Juvenile polyposis, etc)
- Sub-optimal preparation for the procedure, which will be determined by patient history or based on the initial colonoscopy.
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mayo Cliniclead
Study Sites (1)
Mayo Clinic
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224, United States
Related Publications (8)
Jemal A, Tiwari RC, Murray T, Ghafoor A, Samuels A, Ward E, Feuer EJ, Thun MJ; American Cancer Society. Cancer statistics, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004 Jan-Feb;54(1):8-29. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.54.1.8.
PMID: 14974761BACKGROUNDMorson BC. Precancerous and early malignant lesions of the large intestine. Br J Surg. 1968 Oct;55(10):725-31. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800551003. No abstract available.
PMID: 5681027BACKGROUNDMorson B. President's address. The polyp-cancer sequence in the large bowel. Proc R Soc Med. 1974 Jun;67(6 Pt 1):451-7. doi: 10.1177/00359157740676P115. No abstract available.
PMID: 4853754BACKGROUNDCappell MS, Forde KA. Spatial clustering of multiple hyperplastic, adenomatous, and malignant colonic polyps in individual patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1989 Aug;32(8):641-52. doi: 10.1007/BF02555767.
PMID: 2752850BACKGROUNDRex DK, Chadalawada V, Helper DJ. Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Sep;98(9):2000-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07662.x.
PMID: 14499778BACKGROUNDMuto M, Katada C, Sano Y, Yoshida S. Narrow band imaging: a new diagnostic approach to visualize angiogenesis in superficial neoplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Jul;3(7 Suppl 1):S16-20. doi: 10.1016/s1542-3565(05)00262-4.
PMID: 16012987BACKGROUNDKara MA, Peters FP, Rosmolen WD, Krishnadath KK, ten Kate FJ, Fockens P, Bergman JJ. High-resolution endoscopy plus chromoendoscopy or narrow-band imaging in Barrett's esophagus: a prospective randomized crossover study. Endoscopy. 2005 Oct;37(10):929-36. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-870433.
PMID: 16189764BACKGROUNDGross SA, Buchner AM, Crook JE, Cangemi JR, Picco MF, Wolfsen HC, DeVault KR, Loeb DS, Raimondo M, Woodward TA, Wallace MB. A comparison of high definition-image enhanced colonoscopy and standard white-light colonoscopy for colorectal polyp detection. Endoscopy. 2011 Dec;43(12):1045-51. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256894. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
PMID: 21971929DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Seth A. Gross, M.D.
Mayo Clinic
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael B. Wallace, M.D.
Mayo Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 26, 2007
First Posted
January 21, 2009
Study Start
July 1, 2006
Primary Completion
December 1, 2008
Study Completion
December 1, 2008
Last Updated
January 21, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-01