Trial of Non Invasive Ventilation for Respiratoy Distress Syndrome
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Pressure as a Primary Mode for Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the hypothesis that nasal intermittent positive pressure(NIPP), used as a primary mode of ventilation in preterm infants with RDS, will decrease the need for conventional endotracheal ventilation when compared to nasal continuous positive airway pressure.(NCPAP)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2007
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 12, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 13, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 11, 2013
CompletedMarch 12, 2013
March 1, 2013
1.9 years
January 12, 2009
September 24, 2012
March 3, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Need for Endotracheal Ventilation in the First 72 hs of Life
number of participants that needed endotracheal ventilation (failed non invasive ventilation) in the first 72 hours of life
first 72 hs of life
Mechanical Ventilation Within the First 72h of Life in the Two Study Groups.(NIPPV vs NCPAP)
The primary outcome of the study was the need for intubation within the first 72 hours (h) of life.The need for intubation was made by the attending neonatologist, according to the strict protocol of intubation for ventilation, used in the neonatal Unit
first 3 days of life(72hours)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
at 36 weeks gestational age
Study Arms (2)
NCPAP
ACTIVE COMPARATORpreterm infants with nasal positive pressure ventilation as a primary mode of respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome will be compared to preterm infants with nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation
NIPPV
EXPERIMENTALpreterm with nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as a primary mode of respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome
Interventions
Nasal intermittent positive airway pressure will be compared are the nasal continuous positive pressure as an initial ventilatory mode in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- preterm infants with RDS
- assigned to non invasive ventilation
You may not qualify if:
- preterm on endotracheal ventilation
- severe congenital pulmonary or cardiovascular malformation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Maternal Infant Institute Prof Fernando Figueira
Recife, Pernambuco, 50.070-550, Brazil
Instituto materno Infantil Fernando Figueira
Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
Related Publications (9)
Ambalavanan N, Carlo WA. Ventilatory strategies in the prevention and management of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Semin Perinatol. 2006 Aug;30(4):192-9. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.05.006.
PMID: 16860159BACKGROUNDBancalari E, del Moral T. Continuous positive airway pressure: early, late, or stay with synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation? J Perinatol. 2006 May;26 Suppl 1:S33-7; discussion S43-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211471.
PMID: 16625223BACKGROUNDVan Marter LJ, Allred EN, Pagano M, Sanocka U, Parad R, Moore M, Susser M, Paneth N, Leviton A. Do clinical markers of barotrauma and oxygen toxicity explain interhospital variation in rates of chronic lung disease? The Neonatology Committee for the Developmental Network. Pediatrics. 2000 Jun;105(6):1194-201. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.6.1194.
PMID: 10835057BACKGROUNDBhandari V, Gavino RG, Nedrelow JH, Pallela P, Salvador A, Ehrenkranz RA, Brodsky NL. A randomized controlled trial of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in RDS. J Perinatol. 2007 Nov;27(11):697-703. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211805. Epub 2007 Aug 16.
PMID: 17703184BACKGROUNDDe Paoli AG, Davis PG, Lemyre B. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure versus nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation for preterm neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. 2003;92(1):70-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2003.tb00472.x.
PMID: 12650303BACKGROUNDSantin R, Brodsky N, Bhandari V. A prospective observational pilot study of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) as a primary mode of ventilation in infants > or = 28 weeks with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). J Perinatol. 2004 Aug;24(8):487-93. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211131.
PMID: 15141265BACKGROUNDManzar S, Nair AK, Pai MG, Paul J, Manikoth P, Georage M, Al-Khusaiby SM. Use of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation to avoid intubation in neonates. Saudi Med J. 2004 Oct;25(10):1464-7.
PMID: 15494823BACKGROUNDKugelman A, Feferkorn I, Riskin A, Chistyakov I, Kaufman B, Bader D. Nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, controlled, prospective study. J Pediatr. 2007 May;150(5):521-6, 526.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.01.032.
PMID: 17452229BACKGROUNDMeneses J, Bhandari V, Alves JG, Herrmann D. Noninvasive ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2011 Feb;127(2):300-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0922. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
PMID: 21262883DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jucille Meneses
- Organization
- Instituto Materno Infantil prof. Fernando Figueira
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Joao Guilherme B Alves, PhD
Instituto Materno Infantil Prof. Fernando Figueira
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Jucille Meneses Md PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 12, 2009
First Posted
January 13, 2009
Study Start
August 1, 2007
Primary Completion
July 1, 2009
Study Completion
September 1, 2009
Last Updated
March 12, 2013
Results First Posted
February 11, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-03