NCT00821119

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the hypothesis that nasal intermittent positive pressure(NIPP), used as a primary mode of ventilation in preterm infants with RDS, will decrease the need for conventional endotracheal ventilation when compared to nasal continuous positive airway pressure.(NCPAP)

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2007

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2007

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 12, 2009

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 13, 2009

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2009

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2009

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 11, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

March 12, 2013

Status Verified

March 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

January 12, 2009

Results QC Date

September 24, 2012

Last Update Submit

March 3, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

non invasive ventilationmechanical ventilationpulmonary morbiditypreterm infantRespiratory distress syndromenasal intermittent positive pressurenasal continuous positive pressurebronchopulmonary dysplasia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Need for Endotracheal Ventilation in the First 72 hs of Life

    number of participants that needed endotracheal ventilation (failed non invasive ventilation) in the first 72 hours of life

    first 72 hs of life

  • Mechanical Ventilation Within the First 72h of Life in the Two Study Groups.(NIPPV vs NCPAP)

    The primary outcome of the study was the need for intubation within the first 72 hours (h) of life.The need for intubation was made by the attending neonatologist, according to the strict protocol of intubation for ventilation, used in the neonatal Unit

    first 3 days of life(72hours)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

    at 36 weeks gestational age

Study Arms (2)

NCPAP

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

preterm infants with nasal positive pressure ventilation as a primary mode of respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome will be compared to preterm infants with nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation

Device: nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation

NIPPV

EXPERIMENTAL

preterm with nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as a primary mode of respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome

Device: nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation

Interventions

Nasal intermittent positive airway pressure will be compared are the nasal continuous positive pressure as an initial ventilatory mode in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome

Also known as: NIPPV
NCPAPNIPPV

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Day - 1 Day
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • preterm infants with RDS
  • assigned to non invasive ventilation

You may not qualify if:

  • preterm on endotracheal ventilation
  • severe congenital pulmonary or cardiovascular malformation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Maternal Infant Institute Prof Fernando Figueira

Recife, Pernambuco, 50.070-550, Brazil

Location

Instituto materno Infantil Fernando Figueira

Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Ambalavanan N, Carlo WA. Ventilatory strategies in the prevention and management of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Semin Perinatol. 2006 Aug;30(4):192-9. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.05.006.

    PMID: 16860159BACKGROUND
  • Bancalari E, del Moral T. Continuous positive airway pressure: early, late, or stay with synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation? J Perinatol. 2006 May;26 Suppl 1:S33-7; discussion S43-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211471.

    PMID: 16625223BACKGROUND
  • Van Marter LJ, Allred EN, Pagano M, Sanocka U, Parad R, Moore M, Susser M, Paneth N, Leviton A. Do clinical markers of barotrauma and oxygen toxicity explain interhospital variation in rates of chronic lung disease? The Neonatology Committee for the Developmental Network. Pediatrics. 2000 Jun;105(6):1194-201. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.6.1194.

    PMID: 10835057BACKGROUND
  • Bhandari V, Gavino RG, Nedrelow JH, Pallela P, Salvador A, Ehrenkranz RA, Brodsky NL. A randomized controlled trial of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in RDS. J Perinatol. 2007 Nov;27(11):697-703. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211805. Epub 2007 Aug 16.

    PMID: 17703184BACKGROUND
  • De Paoli AG, Davis PG, Lemyre B. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure versus nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation for preterm neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. 2003;92(1):70-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2003.tb00472.x.

    PMID: 12650303BACKGROUND
  • Santin R, Brodsky N, Bhandari V. A prospective observational pilot study of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) as a primary mode of ventilation in infants > or = 28 weeks with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). J Perinatol. 2004 Aug;24(8):487-93. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211131.

    PMID: 15141265BACKGROUND
  • Manzar S, Nair AK, Pai MG, Paul J, Manikoth P, Georage M, Al-Khusaiby SM. Use of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation to avoid intubation in neonates. Saudi Med J. 2004 Oct;25(10):1464-7.

    PMID: 15494823BACKGROUND
  • Kugelman A, Feferkorn I, Riskin A, Chistyakov I, Kaufman B, Bader D. Nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, controlled, prospective study. J Pediatr. 2007 May;150(5):521-6, 526.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.01.032.

    PMID: 17452229BACKGROUND
  • Meneses J, Bhandari V, Alves JG, Herrmann D. Noninvasive ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2011 Feb;127(2):300-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0922. Epub 2011 Jan 24.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Premature BirthRespiratory Distress SyndromeBronchopulmonary Dysplasia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Obstetric Labor, PrematureObstetric Labor ComplicationsPregnancy ComplicationsFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesRespiration DisordersVentilator-Induced Lung InjuryLung InjuryInfant, Premature, DiseasesInfant, Newborn, DiseasesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Results Point of Contact

Title
Jucille Meneses
Organization
Instituto Materno Infantil prof. Fernando Figueira

Study Officials

  • Joao Guilherme B Alves, PhD

    Instituto Materno Infantil Prof. Fernando Figueira

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Jucille Meneses Md PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 12, 2009

First Posted

January 13, 2009

Study Start

August 1, 2007

Primary Completion

July 1, 2009

Study Completion

September 1, 2009

Last Updated

March 12, 2013

Results First Posted

February 11, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-03

Locations