VISSIT Intracranial Stent Study for Ischemic Therapy
VISSIT
Phase III Study of Pharos Vitesse Neurovascular Stent System Compared to Best Medical Therapy for the Treatment of Ischemic Disease
2 other identifiers
interventional
125
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The main objective of this study is to prospectively evaluate the safety, probable benefit, and effectiveness of the PHAROS Vitesse Neurovascular Stent System in a multicenter, randomized clinical trial. A secondary objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of stenting in the neurovasculature to treat cerebral ischemia on other outcomes such as hospital length of stay, charges, and costs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Oct 2008
Longer than P75 for phase_2
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 29, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 31, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 16, 2014
CompletedFebruary 20, 2015
February 1, 2015
4.5 years
December 29, 2008
April 18, 2014
February 2, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Successful Outcome: No Stroke or Hard TIA in the Same Territory Within 12 Months
The primary effectiveness endpoint was a composite of the two following outcomes: * Stroke in the same territory (distal to the target lesion) as the presenting event within 12 months of randomization * Hard Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) in the same territory (distal to the target lesion) as the presenting event from day 2 through month 12 post-randomization A subject was deemed to be a primary endpoint success if neither of these outcomes occurred. The Kaplan-Meier success rate at 12-months post-operatively was calculated with Kaplan-Meier time-to-event methodology, where the time variable for patients who were successful (no stroke within 12 months or hard TIA between 2 days and 12 months) was censored at the time of last follow-up, and the time variable for patients who were not successful (had a stroke within 12 months or hard TIA between 2 days and 12 months) was censored at the time of the first event (stroke with 12 months or hard TIA between 2 days and 12 months).
One Year
Study Arms (2)
Stent Group
EXPERIMENTALMedical therapy + PHAROS Vitesse neurovascular stent ("Stent Group")
Medical Therapy Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORMedical therapy alone ("Medical Therapy Group")
Interventions
Implantation of one or more balloon-expandable Pharos Vitesse stents to treat neurovascular ischemic lesions + Medical therapy \[Treatment with aspirin (81-325 mg daily for the duration of the study) and Clopidogrel (75 mg daily for first 3 months)\]
Medical therapy alone \[Treatment with aspirin (81-325 mg daily for the duration of the study) and Clopidogrel (75 mg daily for first 3 months)\]
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject has at least one neurovascular lesion (70-99%) stenosis \[internal carotid, middle cerebral, vertebral artery (C4-BA), and/or basilar artery\] symptomatic with a hard TIA or stroke attributable to the territory of the lesion within the past 30 days. An intracranial tandem lesion (50-99%) stenosis may be treated if normal artery segment is sufficient length to avoid overlapping stents.
- Target vessel diameter / lesion length measurements are within one of the below per angiogram:
- Vessel diameter is ≥ 2.0 mm and \< 2.5 mm / lesion length is ≤ 16 mm, or
- Vessel diameter is ≥ 2.5 mm and \< 3.0 mm / lesion length is ≤ 18 mm, or
- Vessel diameter is ≥ 3.0 mm and \< 4.5 mm / lesion length is ≤ 26 mm, or
- Vessel diameter is ≥ 4.5 mm and ≤ 5.0 mm / lesion length is ≤ 31 mm
- Subject has normal artery adjacent to each stenosis; diameter 2.0 mm - 5.0 mm
- Subject age is 18-85 years
- Life expectancy is at least 2 years
- Subject 's mRS score is ≤ 3
- Subject is available for study follow-up visits (e.g., lives within 3 hours of research center)
- Subject is willing and cognitively able to provide Informed Consent (consent may be indicated verbally and signed by neutral witness if stroke has impaired hand or visual function)
You may not qualify if:
- Subject has contraindications for balloon expandable stent, e.g.
- Extreme tortuosity at, or proximal to, target lesion,
- More than 2 lesions with \> 50% stenosis (including vertebral ostia and common carotid disease),
- Carotid or vertebral dissection
- CT scan or MRI evidence of any of the following:
- Intracranial hemorrhage of type PH1 or PH2
- Subdural or epidural hemorrhage
- Mass effect, or
- Intracranial tumor (except small meningioma)
- Subject has a previous stent in the territory of the target lesion(s)
- Subject has a previous coil or clip placed in the territory of the target lesion within 6 months
- Subject has a potential source of cardiac embolism requiring anticoagulation therapy (e.g., atrial fibrillation, intracardiac thrombus or vegetation, significant mitral stenosis, mechanical heart valve, congestive heart failure with EF \<30%, or endocarditis)
- Subject has concurrent intracranial pathology, e.g.
- Moyamoya
- Vasculitis documented by biopsy results
- +14 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (7)
Berkefeld J, Hamann GF, du Mesnil R, Kurre W, Steinmetz H, Zanella FE, Sitzer M. [Endovascular treatment for intracranial stenoses. A common statement by neurologists and neuroradiologists]. Nervenarzt. 2006 Dec;77(12):1444-55. doi: 10.1007/s00115-006-2182-z. German.
PMID: 17119891BACKGROUNDChimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Howlett-Smith H, Stern BJ, Hertzberg VS, Frankel MR, Levine SR, Chaturvedi S, Kasner SE, Benesch CG, Sila CA, Jovin TG, Romano JG; Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease Trial Investigators. Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 31;352(13):1305-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043033.
PMID: 15800226BACKGROUNDCruz-Flores S, Diamond AL. Angioplasty for intracranial artery stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD004133. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004133.pub2.
PMID: 16856032BACKGROUNDDerdeyn CP, Chimowitz MI. Angioplasty and stenting for atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis: rationale for a randomized clinical trial. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2007 Aug;17(3):355-63, viii-ix. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2007.05.001.
PMID: 17826637BACKGROUNDFiorella D, Chow MM, Anderson M, Woo H, Rasmussen PA, Masaryk TJ. A 7-year experience with balloon-mounted coronary stents for the treatment of symptomatic vertebrobasilar intracranial atheromatous disease. Neurosurgery. 2007 Aug;61(2):236-42; discussion 242-3. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000255521.42579.31.
PMID: 17762735BACKGROUNDFiorella D, Woo HH. Emerging endovascular therapies for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Stroke. 2007 Aug;38(8):2391-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.482752. Epub 2007 Jun 21. No abstract available.
PMID: 17585085BACKGROUNDZaidat OO, Fitzsimmons BF, Woodward BK, Wang Z, Killer-Oberpfalzer M, Wakhloo A, Gupta R, Kirshner H, Megerian JT, Lesko J, Pitzer P, Ramos J, Castonguay AC, Barnwell S, Smith WS, Gress DR; VISSIT Trial Investigators. Effect of a balloon-expandable intracranial stent vs medical therapy on risk of stroke in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis: the VISSIT randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015 Mar 24-31;313(12):1240-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.1693.
PMID: 25803346DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Early termination of enrollment led to small numbers of subjects analyzed (less than 50% of the prospectively planned sample size). Various endpoints, subgroup and sensitivity analyses were not conducted because the study was not fully enrolled.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jonathan Megerian, MD PhD
- Organization
- Codman Neuro
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 29, 2008
First Posted
December 31, 2008
Study Start
October 1, 2008
Primary Completion
April 1, 2013
Study Completion
June 1, 2014
Last Updated
February 20, 2015
Results First Posted
June 16, 2014
Record last verified: 2015-02