Prothrombin Times Outside the Therapeutic Range in Otherwise Stable Patients
FORESPEAK-0
Management of Prothrombin Times Outside the Therapeutic Range in Patients on Warfarin and With Otherwise Stable Levels
1 other identifier
interventional
160
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Warfarin is very effective for the prevention of blood clots (thrombosis). A test of coagulation, the prothrombin time (PT) is used to monitor the effect. The PT response to warfarin can fluctuate as a result of interactions with a large number of other drugs, food or herbal agents as well as for no apparent reason. Thus, frequent monitoring of the PT and dose adjustments according to the results are required. One third of our patients remain on the same maintenance dose over 6 months. However, also these patients sometimes have a PT result moderately outside the therapeutic range without any obvious explanation. Too short PTs may be due to missed dose(s) or more dark green vegetables in the diet. Too long PTs may be due to a course of antibiotic therapy or less dark green vegetables. Laboratory errors may also occur and can cause deviations in any direction. Most likely, unnoticed fluctuations in the PT occur as well between the time points of monitoring. There are no guidelines on how to manage the treatment in this situation but there are some typical "behaviours". Behavior A: Some physicians simply let the patient continue with the same dose. "It is extremely unlikely that the very temporary dose adjustment has any effect on the PT result 4 weeks later and this is a "cosmetic procedure"." Behavior B: Others recommend the patients to take ½ - 1 additional dose in case of short PT and to skip a dose or take half dose in case of long PT, and thereafter to continue with the usual dose. "The investigators need to quickly correct the temporary aberration in order to avoid thrombotic or bleeding complications the next few days. This may seem like an issue of no importance. The investigators are however performing a series of studies to evaluate if these stable patients can be managed with blood tests less often than every 4 weeks. For that purpose it is important to know how often and why aberrant results occur, the implication and to what extent they can be ignored. The investigators hypothesis is that in patients with very stable PT-results and unchanged dose for 3 months, should continue with exactly the same maintenance dose, even when the result unexpectedly is slightly above or below the therapeutic range. The investigators believe that most of these occasional PT-results outside the therapeutic range are due to laboratory errors, perhaps missed doses by the patient or temporary change in diet or medications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2 atrial-fibrillation
Started Jul 2006
Typical duration for phase_2 atrial-fibrillation
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 23, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 24, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 25, 2009
CompletedAugust 1, 2012
July 1, 2012
2.5 years
December 23, 2008
October 7, 2009
July 24, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Patients With Prothrombin Time Results Within the Therapeutic Range After 2 Weeks
The number of patients with "follow-up INRs" within the therapeutic range was compared for patients with a single dose skipped/reduced/added versus patients with no change of dose.
2 weeks
Study Arms (2)
No change
EXPERIMENTALIntervention Drug warfarin no change in the dose is performed
Change
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntervention Drug Warfarin One dose increased if subtherapeutic level; one dose deleted or reduced if supratherapeutic level
Interventions
No change: Continue without any change in spite of prothrombin time outside the therapeutic range.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients on long-term warfarin (for prophylaxis of arterial embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation or mechanical heart valve replacement, or secondary prophylaxis after VTE) with a target INR of 2.0-3.0 or 2.5-3.5,
- Anticoagulant therapy managed by the clinic (HHS - General Hospital) for at least 3 months prior to enrolment, and
- Maintenance dose of warfarin unchanged for the previous 3 months or longer.
- The INR result is outside the therapeutic range as follows:
- For those with target 2.0-3.0: Either an INR of 1.5-1.9 or an INR of 3.1-4.4. For those with target 2.5-3.5: Either an INR of 1.5-2.4 or an INR of 3.6-4.4.
You may not qualify if:
- Age \<18 years,
- Long-term (\>1 week) change in any other medication
- Long-term (\>1 week) change in diet, especially regarding green vegetables.
- Attending physician believes the patient is not suitable for the study (e.g. psychiatric disorder, history of non-compliance),
- Failure to obtain telephone consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Thrombosis Service, HHS-General Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario, L8L 2X2, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Schulman S, Melinyshyn A, Ennis D, Rudd-Scott L. Single-dose adjustment versus no adjustment of warfarin in stably anticoagulated patients with an occasional international normalized ratio (INR) out of range. Thromb Res. 2010 May;125(5):393-7. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
PMID: 19640572RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Sam Schulman, MD
- Organization
- McMaster University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sam Schulman, MD, PhD
McMaster University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 23, 2008
First Posted
December 24, 2008
Study Start
July 1, 2006
Primary Completion
January 1, 2009
Study Completion
April 1, 2009
Last Updated
August 1, 2012
Results First Posted
November 25, 2009
Record last verified: 2012-07