Functional Antigen Matching in Corneal Transplantation
FANCY
Clinical Trial to Investigate Superiority of HLA Matching in Comparison to Random Graft Assignment With Respect to the Endpoint 'Time to First Endothelial Graft Rejection' in Penetrating Keratoplasty.
1 other identifier
interventional
650
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Penetrating keratoplasty is one of the most commonly performed transplantation surgeries. Graft rejection is a major complication. HLA compatibility has already been demonstrated an effective prophylaxis in several retrospective investigations. The purpose of the investigators randomized clinical trial is to demonstrate superiority of HLA matching in comparison to random graft assignment with respect to the endpoint 'time to first endothelial graft rejection' in penetrating keratoplasty. The investigators will perform DNA-based allele resolution typing.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2009
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 17, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 18, 2008
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2015
CompletedOctober 25, 2016
October 1, 2016
5.7 years
December 17, 2008
October 24, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to first endothelial graft rejection.
Mostly within the first six months.
Study Arms (2)
HLA Matching
EXPERIMENTALHLA matching is exerted by selecting the donor with least-most additional HLA alleles. We will predict the waiting time for such a donor in order to assess eligibility for the trial \[8\]. In addition, we will dynamically adopt the degree of matching that is aimed at depending on the predicted time interval and actual waiting time: the first donors not exerting more than 7 mismatches at the triplet-amino-acid-residue-level (HLAMatchmaker method \[6\]) is accepted if the patient is waiting less than half of his predicted waiting time. The next available donor exerting a 2/6 match (or better) is assigned thereafter. The next graft will be assigned, regardless of HLA matching after 6 months.
Random graft assignment
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
HLA matching is exerted by selecting the donor with least-most additional HLA alleles. We will predict the waiting time for such a donor in order to assess eligibility for the trial \[8\]. In addition, we will dynamically adopt the degree of matching that is aimed at depending on the predicted time interval and actual waiting time: the first donors not exerting more than 7 mismatches at the triplet-amino-acid-residue-level (HLAMatchmaker method \[6\]) is accepted if the patient is waiting less than half of his predicted waiting time. The next available donor exerting a 2/6 match (or better) is assigned thereafter. The next graft will be assigned, regardless of HLA matching after 6 months.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Predicted waiting time for a 4/6 match lower than 6 months.
You may not qualify if:
- Minority
- Legal incapacity
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Hospital Freiburglead
- German Research Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University Eye Hospital Freiburg
Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Wurttemberg, 79106, Germany
Related Publications (8)
Bohringer D, Spierings E, Enczmann J, Bohringer S, Sundmacher R, Goulmy E, Reinhard T. Matching of the minor histocompatibility antigen HLA-A1/H-Y may improve prognosis in corneal transplantation. Transplantation. 2006 Oct 27;82(8):1037-41. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000235908.54766.44.
PMID: 17060851BACKGROUNDReinhard T, Spelsberg H, Henke L, Kontopoulos T, Enczmann J, Wernet P, Berschick P, Sundmacher R, Bohringer D. Long-term results of allogeneic penetrating limbo-keratoplasty in total limbal stem cell deficiency. Ophthalmology. 2004 Apr;111(4):775-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.07.013.
PMID: 15051212BACKGROUNDReinhard T, Bohringer D, Enczmann J, Kogler G, Mayweg S, Wernet P, Sundmacher R. Improvement of graft prognosis in penetrating normal-risk keratoplasty by HLA class I and II matching. Eye (Lond). 2004 Mar;18(3):269-77. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700636.
PMID: 15004576BACKGROUNDBohringer D, Reinhard T, Duquesnoy RJ, Bohringer S, Enczmann J, Lange P, Claas F, Sundmacher R. Beneficial effect of matching at the HLA-A and -B amino-acid triplet level on rejection-free clear graft survival in penetrating keratoplasty. Transplantation. 2004 Feb 15;77(3):417-21. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000110415.10401.94.
PMID: 14966417BACKGROUNDReinhard T, Bohringer D, Enczmann J, Kogler G, Wernet P, Bohringer S, Sundmacher R. HLA class I/II matching and chronic endothelial cell loss in penetrating normal risk keratoplasty. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2004 Feb;82(1):13-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1600-0420.2003.00188.x.
PMID: 14738484BACKGROUNDBohringer D, Reinhard T, Enczmann J, Godehard E, Sundmacher R. Individual analysis of expected time on the waiting list for HLA-matched corneal grafts. Dev Ophthalmol. 2003;36:50-5. doi: 10.1159/000067648.
PMID: 12494680BACKGROUNDBohringer D, Grotejohann B, Ihorst G, Reinshagen H, Spierings E, Reinhard T. Rejection Prophylaxis in Corneal Transplant. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018 Apr 13;115(15):259-265. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0259.
PMID: 29735006DERIVEDBohringer D, Ihorst G, Grotejohann B, Maurer J, Spierings E, Reinhard T; FANCY study group. Functional antigen matching in corneal transplantation: matching for the HLA-A, -B and -DRB1 antigens (FANCY) - study protocol. BMC Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec 13;14:156. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-14-156.
PMID: 25496165DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Apl.Prof.Dr.med.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 17, 2008
First Posted
December 18, 2008
Study Start
September 1, 2009
Primary Completion
May 1, 2015
Study Completion
May 1, 2015
Last Updated
October 25, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-10