Treatment Study of Carnosine Versus Placebo in Gulf War Illness (GWI)
Carnosine Versus Placebo Treatment Study in Gulf War Illness (GWI)
3 other identifiers
interventional
33
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to perform a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12 week study of the effects of carnosine on cognitive, psychometric, autonomic, and muscle strength outcomes in 100 GWI subjects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Aug 2008
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 17, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 18, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 18, 2016
CompletedJune 28, 2019
June 1, 2019
3.9 years
December 17, 2008
March 24, 2014
June 18, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Effect of Carnosine Supplementation on Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Severity Scores
CFS Severity Score (Δ ≥ 5 / 36) (Baraniuk et al., 1998; Baraniuk et al., 2000a; Baraniuk, Naranch, Maibach, \& Clauw, 2000b). Subjects scored the severity of the 9 CFS criteria (Fatigue, memory/concentration, sore throat, sore lymph nodes, sore muscles, sore joints, headache, sleep disturbances, exertional exhaustion from Fukuda et al. 1994) on a scale of none (score=0), trivial (1), mild (2), moderate (3) and severe (4). The sum was 36. Individuals taking carnosine were predicted to show a decrease of ≥ 5 at week 12 compared to week 0, compared to no change for placebo subjects. 2-tailed paired t-tests were used to determine significant incremental changes for individuals in the carnosine group compared to the placebo group.
Weeks 0 and 12
Subjects With Improved Diarrhea Symptoms
Patients were given questionnaires assessing common symptom complaints of diarrhea.
Weeks 0 and 12
Incremental Change in Fatigue Score From Baseline to Week 12
Instantaneous Fatigue was scored as none (0) to severe (10) at week 0 and week 12. The difference between the Week 12 minus the Week 0 values was the incremental change. If the incremental change was greater than 0, then the Instantaneous Fatigue was worse at week 12 than week 0. If the incremental change was less than 0, then the Instantaneous Fatigue was improved at week 12 compared to week 0. The total potential range for incremental change was from -10 to +10.
Week 0 and Week 12
SF36 Bodily Pain
Incremental change in Medical Outcome Survey Short Form 36 questionnaire (SF36) Bodily Pain score from baseline to week 12. The Medical Outcome Survey Short Form 36 questionnaire (SF36) Bodily Pain score ranges from 0 (very bad bodily pain) to 100 (no bodily pain). The incremental change was the Medical Outcome Survey Short Form 36 questionnaire (SF36) Bodily Pain score at week 12 minus the Medical Outcome Survey Short Form 36 questionnaire (SF36) Bodily Pain score at baseline. The range of scores for incremental change was from -100 to +100. Scores of 0 for Medical Outcome Survey Short Form 36 questionnaire (SF36) Bodily Pain score at baseline and +100 at week 12 indicate an incremental change of 100 - 0 = +100. A score of 100 at baseline for the Medical Outcome Survey Short Form 36 questionnaire (SF36) Bodily Pain score at baseline of +100 at week 12 gives an incremental change of 0 - 100 = -100.
Week 0 and Week 12
Incremental Change in Generalized Anxiety Scale (GAD) Scores From Baseline to Week 12
Each item on the Generalized Anxiety Scale (GAD) scores was scored as none (0), trivial (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4) and the sum of the 7 items calculated (range 0 to 28). The incremental change between Week 0 and Week 12 was determined for each treatment.
Week 0 and Week 12
Incremental Change in SF36 General Health Between Baseline and Week 12
Incremental change in SF36 General Health score from baseline to week 12. The SF36 General Health score ranges from 0 (very bad General Health) to 100 (very good General Health). The incremental change was the SF36 General Health score at week 12 minus the SF36 General Health score at baseline. The range of scores for incremental change was from -100 to +100. Scores of 0 for SF36 General Health score at baseline and +100 at week 12 indicate an incremental change of 100 - 0 = +100. A score of 100 at baseline for the SF36 General Health score at baseline of +100 at week 12 gives an incremental change of 0 - 100 = -100.
Week 0 and Week 12
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Digit Symbol Substitution (WAIS)
Difference between Week 0 and Week 12 (end of study)
Study Arms (2)
Carnosine treatment group
ACTIVE COMPARATORCarnosine treatment group
Placebo control group
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo control group
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Evidence of military enlistment between August 1, 1990 and July 31, 1991, and deployment for 30 consecutive days to:
- Persian Gulf waters and adjacent land areas,
- Other global locations, or,
- U.S. only. 1990-1991 enlistment status:
- Active duty
- National Guard
- Reserves
You may not qualify if:
- HIV/AIDS
- Pregnant Women
- Active Duty Military Personnel
- Children
- Incarceration
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Georgetown University
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007, United States
Related Publications (5)
Gray GC, Reed RJ, Kaiser KS, Smith TC, Gastanaga VM. Self-reported symptoms and medical conditions among 11,868 Gulf War-era veterans: the Seabee Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2002 Jun 1;155(11):1033-44. doi: 10.1093/aje/155.11.1033.
PMID: 12034582BACKGROUNDBaraniuk JN, Casado B, Maibach H, Clauw DJ, Pannell LK, Hess S S. A Chronic Fatigue Syndrome - related proteome in human cerebrospinal fluid. BMC Neurol. 2005 Dec 1;5:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-5-22.
PMID: 16321154BACKGROUNDJanssen B, Hohenadel D, Brinkkoetter P, Peters V, Rind N, Fischer C, Rychlik I, Cerna M, Romzova M, de Heer E, Baelde H, Bakker SJ, Zirie M, Rondeau E, Mathieson P, Saleem MA, Meyer J, Koppel H, Sauerhoefer S, Bartram CR, Nawroth P, Hammes HP, Yard BA, Zschocke J, van der Woude FJ. Carnosine as a protective factor in diabetic nephropathy: association with a leucine repeat of the carnosinase gene CNDP1. Diabetes. 2005 Aug;54(8):2320-7. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.8.2320.
PMID: 16046297BACKGROUNDChez MG, Buchanan CP, Aimonovitch MC, Becker M, Schaefer K, Black C, Komen J. Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of L-carnosine supplementation in children with autistic spectrum disorders. J Child Neurol. 2002 Nov;17(11):833-7. doi: 10.1177/08830738020170111501.
PMID: 12585724BACKGROUNDBaraniuk JN, El-Amin S, Corey R, Rayhan R, Timbol C. Carnosine treatment for gulf war illness: a randomized controlled trial. Glob J Health Sci. 2013 Feb 4;5(3):69-81. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v5n3p69.
PMID: 23618477RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Small sample sizes. No measure of changes in brain carnosine/homocarnosine/GABA. Subjective outcomes were insensitive to change. Stool consistency needed better scoring system.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. James N Baraniuk
- Organization
- Georgetown University Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James N Baraniuk, MD
Georgetown University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 17, 2008
First Posted
December 18, 2008
Study Start
August 1, 2008
Primary Completion
July 1, 2012
Study Completion
July 1, 2012
Last Updated
June 28, 2019
Results First Posted
August 18, 2016
Record last verified: 2019-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share