Evaluation of Two Methods of Jejunal Placement of Enteral Feeding Tubes in Critically Ill Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
42
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In patients with high gastric residual volumes jejunal feeding is recommended. Jejunal feeding tubes can be placed in different ways. The endoscopic technique yields a success rate between 90 and 98% for a correct jejunal placement. However, it requires endoscopic equipment and trained staff. In contrast in small uncontrolled trials different unguided techniques resulted in success rates up to 75%, only. In this prospective randomized trial the success rate of a correct jejunal placement with the endoscopic technique is compared with the unguided frictional technique. The investigators hypothesize that the success rate of the unguided frictional placement method will be lower than the success rate of the endoscopic method.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2005
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 10, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 11, 2008
CompletedDecember 11, 2008
December 1, 2008
1 year
December 10, 2008
December 10, 2008
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Success rate of correct jejunal placement
24h
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Duration of jejunal tube placement (initiation of jejunal tube placement till correct jejunal placement
24h
Adverse effects of tube placement and adverse side effects of jejunal tubes during the ICU stay
ICU-stay
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTALPlacement of jejunal feeding tube using the unguided frictional method
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORJejunal tube placement using the endoscopic method
Interventions
The self-advancing nasal jejunal feeding tube has small alternating cilia-like plastic flaps to help to advance it into the small bowel via peristalsis. The tube is placed in the stomach (50-60 cm mark). Then the tube is left in place for 1 hour to allow the patient's peristalsis to advance the tube by catching its small plastic tabs. Thereafter, the tube is manually advanced 10 cm every hour until the 100 cm mark of length is reached. To improve peristalsis, 10mg metoclopramide i.v. and 200mg erythromycin i.v. 15 minutes before the procedure are administered.
Jejunal feeding tubes are placed using endoscopy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Intubated and mechanically ventilated
- Intolerance of intragastric enteral nutrition: defined as high gastric residual volumes (≥ 250ml / 24 hours) and/or repeated vomiting.
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindication for enteral nutrition or gastric endoscopy
- Previous upper gastrointestinal surgery
- Signs of active gastric bleeding
- Severe nasopharyngeal injuries or stenosis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ulrike Holzinger, MD
Medical University of Vienna
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 10, 2008
First Posted
December 11, 2008
Study Start
February 1, 2005
Primary Completion
February 1, 2006
Study Completion
April 1, 2006
Last Updated
December 11, 2008
Record last verified: 2008-12