NCT00805844

Brief Summary

To determine if using usual clinical practice plus a depth of anesthesia monitor, SedLine, to guide anesthetic administration improves the quality and ease of MEP monitoring in patients undergoing corrective spinal procedures.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
70

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2008

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2008

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 9, 2008

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 10, 2008

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2009

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2009

Completed
Last Updated

July 15, 2011

Status Verified

July 1, 2011

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

December 9, 2008

Last Update Submit

July 13, 2011

Conditions

Keywords

SpineMotor Evoked Potentials

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The primary outcome of this study is a composite measure of the motor evoked responses over the duration of the surgical procedure utilizing the "area under the curve" (AUC, volt-seconds) of the response time series

    End of study

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Secondary outcomes include i) Stimulation threshold ii) MEP fade index and iii) Facilitation necessity and stability.

    end of study

Study Arms (2)

1

Spine surgery with Motor Evoked Potential monitoring without SedLine monitoring visible.

2

Spine surgery with Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring with SedLine monitoring visible.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients undergoing corrective spinal procedures, for whom MEP monitoring has been requested by the surgeon.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients undergoing corrective spinal procedures, for whom MEP monitoring has been requested by the surgeon.
  • yrs of age or older

You may not qualify if:

  • Minors, prisoners and those unable to consent for themselves.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of California San Francisco

San Francisco, California, 94143, United States

Location

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 9, 2008

First Posted

December 10, 2008

Study Start

September 1, 2008

Primary Completion

July 1, 2009

Study Completion

September 1, 2009

Last Updated

July 15, 2011

Record last verified: 2011-07

Locations