Two Phase Clinical Study of the Impact of Contact Lenses and Solutions on Corneal Structure
1 other identifier
interventional
51
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Assess the usefulness of using confocal microscopy to examine changes to the structure of the cornea and to identify any potential consequences of contact lens wear and/or solution use.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2008
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 5, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 9, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 23, 2018
CompletedJanuary 23, 2018
December 1, 2017
4 months
December 5, 2008
March 31, 2017
December 20, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
HRT Corneal Scan
Looking for cell density
baseline and 2 hours
Study Arms (3)
Placebo 1
PLACEBO COMPARATORSubjects that have never worn contacts with no ocular problems were selected. A baseline HRT was performed. Trial contact lenses were soaked in clear care solution for 10 hours. After 10 hours of the lenses soaking in clear care the subject returned. The contacts lenses that were soaked in clear care were inserted onto the patients eyes. The patient then wore the contacts for two hours. After two hours the contact lenses were removed. An HRT was performed immediately after removing the contact lenses. The HRT scans were analyzed for dendritic cell migration, basal cell epithelial density and nerve density and tortuosity.
Renu
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects that had worn contacts for at least two weeks without incident were selected. A baseline HRT was performed.Trial contacts lenses were soaked in ReNu contact solution for 10 hours. After 10 hours of the lenses soaking in ReNu the subject returned. The contacts were inserted onto the patients eyes. The patient then wore the contacts for two hours. After two hours the contacts lenses were removed. An HRT both with and without sodium fluorescein was performed immediately after removing the contact lenses.The HRT scans were analyzed for dendritic cell migration, basal cell epithelial density and nerve density and tortuosity.
Optifree
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects that had worn contacts for at least two weeks without incident were selected. A baseline HRT was performed.Trial contacts lenses were soaked in Optifree Replenish contact solution for 10 hours. After 10 hours of the lenses soaking in Optifree Replenish the subject returned. The contacts were inserted onto the patients eyes. The patient wore contacts the for two hours. After two hours the contacts were removed. An HRT both with and without sodium fluorescein was performed immediately after removing the contact lenses.The HRT scans were analyzed for dendritic cell migration, basal cell epithelial density and nerve density and tortuosity.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Vision correctable to 20/30 or better in both eyes
- Successful soft contact lens wear for at least 2 weeks prior to enrollment
You may not qualify if:
- History of hypersensitivity to any of the components in any of the lens solutions
- One functional eye or a monofit lens
- Any abnormal slit-lamp finding at baseline
- Use of topical ocular meds
- Any systemic condition with significant ocular side effects or that interfere with contact lens wear
- Enrollment of the investigator's office staff, relatives or members of their respective households
- Enrollment of more than one member of the same household
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Christine Sindtlead
- Alcon Researchcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Iowa Contact Lens Clinic
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
Related Publications (11)
Patel DV, McGhee CN. In vivo laser scanning confocal microscopy confirms that the human corneal sub-basal nerve plexus is a highly dynamic structure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Aug;49(8):3409-12. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-1951. Epub 2008 Apr 25.
PMID: 18441297BACKGROUNDDosso AA, Rungger-Brandle E. Clinical course of epidemic keratoconjunctivitis: evaluation by in vivo confocal microscopy. Cornea. 2008 Apr;27(3):263-8. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31815b7d7d.
PMID: 18362649BACKGROUNDFonn D, Simpson T, Woods J, Woods C. New technologies to assess lens-mediated effects of the cornea. Eye Contact Lens. 2007 Nov;33(6 Pt 2):364-70; discussion 382. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e318157c98f.
PMID: 17975422BACKGROUNDBantseev V, McCanna DJ, Driot JY, Ward KW, Sivak JG. Biocompatibility of contact lens solutions using confocal laser scanning microscopy and the in vitro bovine cornea. Eye Contact Lens. 2007 Nov;33(6 Pt 1):308-16. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e31803c55ad.
PMID: 17993827BACKGROUNDKanavi MR, Javadi M, Yazdani S, Mirdehghanm S. Sensitivity and specificity of confocal scan in the diagnosis of infectious keratitis. Cornea. 2007 Aug;26(7):782-6. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318064582d.
PMID: 17667609BACKGROUNDEfron N. Contact lens-induced changes in the anterior eye as observed in vivo with the confocal microscope. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2007 Jul;26(4):398-436. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2007.03.003. Epub 2007 Apr 1.
PMID: 17498998BACKGROUNDZhivov A, Stave J, Vollmar B, Guthoff R. In vivo confocal microscopic evaluation of langerhans cell density and distribution in the corneal epithelium of healthy volunteers and contact lens wearers. Cornea. 2007 Jan;26(1):47-54. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31802e3b55.
PMID: 17198013BACKGROUNDBastion ML, Mohamad MH. Study of the factors associated with the presence of white dots in the corneas of regular soft contact lens users from an Asian country. Eye Contact Lens. 2006 Sep;32(5):223-7. doi: 10.1097/01.icl.0000199891.35160.68.
PMID: 16974154BACKGROUNDSu PY, Hu FR, Chen YM, Han JH, Chen WL. Dendritiform cells found in central cornea by in-vivo confocal microscopy in a patient with mixed bacterial keratitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2006 Aug;14(4):241-4. doi: 10.1080/09273940600732398.
PMID: 16911987BACKGROUNDNguyen TH, Dudek LT, Krisciunas TC, Matiaco P, Planck SR, Mathers WD, Rosenbaum JT. In vivo confocal microscopy: increased conjunctival or episcleral leukocyte adhesion in patients who wear contact lenses with lower oxygen permeability (Dk) values. Cornea. 2004 Oct;23(7):695-700. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000127482.00843.c8.
PMID: 15448495BACKGROUNDPatel SV, McLaren JW, Hodge DO, Bourne WM. Confocal microscopy in vivo in corneas of long-term contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002 Apr;43(4):995-1003.
PMID: 11923239BACKGROUND
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Christine W. Sindt
- Organization
- University of Iowa
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christine W Sindt, O.D.
University of Iowa
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 5, 2008
First Posted
December 9, 2008
Study Start
November 1, 2008
Primary Completion
March 1, 2009
Study Completion
March 1, 2009
Last Updated
January 23, 2018
Results First Posted
January 23, 2018
Record last verified: 2017-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no plan to share IPD.