NCT00804999

Brief Summary

Assess the usefulness of using confocal microscopy to examine changes to the structure of the cornea and to identify any potential consequences of contact lens wear and/or solution use.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
51

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2008

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2008

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 5, 2008

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 9, 2008

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2009

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2009

Completed
8.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 23, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

January 23, 2018

Status Verified

December 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

December 5, 2008

Results QC Date

March 31, 2017

Last Update Submit

December 20, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

confocal microscopycontact lens wearcontact lens solutionssodium fluorescein

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • HRT Corneal Scan

    Looking for cell density

    baseline and 2 hours

Study Arms (3)

Placebo 1

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Subjects that have never worn contacts with no ocular problems were selected. A baseline HRT was performed. Trial contact lenses were soaked in clear care solution for 10 hours. After 10 hours of the lenses soaking in clear care the subject returned. The contacts lenses that were soaked in clear care were inserted onto the patients eyes. The patient then wore the contacts for two hours. After two hours the contact lenses were removed. An HRT was performed immediately after removing the contact lenses. The HRT scans were analyzed for dendritic cell migration, basal cell epithelial density and nerve density and tortuosity.

Drug: Clear Care

Renu

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects that had worn contacts for at least two weeks without incident were selected. A baseline HRT was performed.Trial contacts lenses were soaked in ReNu contact solution for 10 hours. After 10 hours of the lenses soaking in ReNu the subject returned. The contacts were inserted onto the patients eyes. The patient then wore the contacts for two hours. After two hours the contacts lenses were removed. An HRT both with and without sodium fluorescein was performed immediately after removing the contact lenses.The HRT scans were analyzed for dendritic cell migration, basal cell epithelial density and nerve density and tortuosity.

Drug: ReNu

Optifree

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects that had worn contacts for at least two weeks without incident were selected. A baseline HRT was performed.Trial contacts lenses were soaked in Optifree Replenish contact solution for 10 hours. After 10 hours of the lenses soaking in Optifree Replenish the subject returned. The contacts were inserted onto the patients eyes. The patient wore contacts the for two hours. After two hours the contacts were removed. An HRT both with and without sodium fluorescein was performed immediately after removing the contact lenses.The HRT scans were analyzed for dendritic cell migration, basal cell epithelial density and nerve density and tortuosity.

Drug: OPTI-FREE

Interventions

neutralized Clear Care

Also known as: hydrogen peroxide disinfecting solution
Placebo 1
ReNuDRUG

overnight soak in solution

Renu

overnight soak in solution

Also known as: Replenish
Optifree

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Vision correctable to 20/30 or better in both eyes
  • Successful soft contact lens wear for at least 2 weeks prior to enrollment

You may not qualify if:

  • History of hypersensitivity to any of the components in any of the lens solutions
  • One functional eye or a monofit lens
  • Any abnormal slit-lamp finding at baseline
  • Use of topical ocular meds
  • Any systemic condition with significant ocular side effects or that interfere with contact lens wear
  • Enrollment of the investigator's office staff, relatives or members of their respective households
  • Enrollment of more than one member of the same household

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Iowa Contact Lens Clinic

Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Patel DV, McGhee CN. In vivo laser scanning confocal microscopy confirms that the human corneal sub-basal nerve plexus is a highly dynamic structure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Aug;49(8):3409-12. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-1951. Epub 2008 Apr 25.

    PMID: 18441297BACKGROUND
  • Dosso AA, Rungger-Brandle E. Clinical course of epidemic keratoconjunctivitis: evaluation by in vivo confocal microscopy. Cornea. 2008 Apr;27(3):263-8. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31815b7d7d.

    PMID: 18362649BACKGROUND
  • Fonn D, Simpson T, Woods J, Woods C. New technologies to assess lens-mediated effects of the cornea. Eye Contact Lens. 2007 Nov;33(6 Pt 2):364-70; discussion 382. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e318157c98f.

    PMID: 17975422BACKGROUND
  • Bantseev V, McCanna DJ, Driot JY, Ward KW, Sivak JG. Biocompatibility of contact lens solutions using confocal laser scanning microscopy and the in vitro bovine cornea. Eye Contact Lens. 2007 Nov;33(6 Pt 1):308-16. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e31803c55ad.

    PMID: 17993827BACKGROUND
  • Kanavi MR, Javadi M, Yazdani S, Mirdehghanm S. Sensitivity and specificity of confocal scan in the diagnosis of infectious keratitis. Cornea. 2007 Aug;26(7):782-6. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318064582d.

    PMID: 17667609BACKGROUND
  • Efron N. Contact lens-induced changes in the anterior eye as observed in vivo with the confocal microscope. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2007 Jul;26(4):398-436. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2007.03.003. Epub 2007 Apr 1.

    PMID: 17498998BACKGROUND
  • Zhivov A, Stave J, Vollmar B, Guthoff R. In vivo confocal microscopic evaluation of langerhans cell density and distribution in the corneal epithelium of healthy volunteers and contact lens wearers. Cornea. 2007 Jan;26(1):47-54. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31802e3b55.

    PMID: 17198013BACKGROUND
  • Bastion ML, Mohamad MH. Study of the factors associated with the presence of white dots in the corneas of regular soft contact lens users from an Asian country. Eye Contact Lens. 2006 Sep;32(5):223-7. doi: 10.1097/01.icl.0000199891.35160.68.

    PMID: 16974154BACKGROUND
  • Su PY, Hu FR, Chen YM, Han JH, Chen WL. Dendritiform cells found in central cornea by in-vivo confocal microscopy in a patient with mixed bacterial keratitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2006 Aug;14(4):241-4. doi: 10.1080/09273940600732398.

    PMID: 16911987BACKGROUND
  • Nguyen TH, Dudek LT, Krisciunas TC, Matiaco P, Planck SR, Mathers WD, Rosenbaum JT. In vivo confocal microscopy: increased conjunctival or episcleral leukocyte adhesion in patients who wear contact lenses with lower oxygen permeability (Dk) values. Cornea. 2004 Oct;23(7):695-700. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000127482.00843.c8.

    PMID: 15448495BACKGROUND
  • Patel SV, McLaren JW, Hodge DO, Bourne WM. Confocal microscopy in vivo in corneas of long-term contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002 Apr;43(4):995-1003.

    PMID: 11923239BACKGROUND

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Christine W. Sindt
Organization
University of Iowa

Study Officials

  • Christine W Sindt, O.D.

    University of Iowa

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2008

First Posted

December 9, 2008

Study Start

November 1, 2008

Primary Completion

March 1, 2009

Study Completion

March 1, 2009

Last Updated

January 23, 2018

Results First Posted

January 23, 2018

Record last verified: 2017-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

There is no plan to share IPD.

Locations