Saline Solution Versus Voluven®: A Controlled Study of Fluid Resuscitation in Severe Sepsis
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Fluid resuscitation of severe sepsis may consist of natural or artificial colloids or crystalloids. There is no evidence-based support for one type of fluid over another. The investigators hypothesis is that fluid resuscitation with Voluven® is advantageous to normal saline solution to improve sublingual microcirculation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3 sepsis
Started Jan 2006
Typical duration for phase_3 sepsis
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 28, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2009
CompletedSeptember 15, 2009
September 1, 2009
3.6 years
November 28, 2008
September 14, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Sublingual microcirculation
24 hour
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Gases, hemoglobin and oxygen saturations
24 hours
Electrolytes and lactate
24 hours
Anion gap corrected to albumin
24 hours
Study Arms (2)
Voluven
ACTIVE COMPARATORResuscitation fluid: Voluven (R)
Saline
ACTIVE COMPARATORResuscitation fluid: Saline solution
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Severe sepsis
You may not qualify if:
- Age of less than 18 years
- Pregnancy, or the presence of an acute cerebral vascular event, acute coronary syndrome, acute pulmonary edema, status asthmatics
- Cardiac dysrhythmias (as a primary diagnosis), contraindication to central venous catheterization, active gastrointestinal hemorrhage, seizure
- Drug overdose, burn injury, trauma, a requirement for immediate surgery, uncured cancer (during chemotherapy
- Immunosuppression (because of organ transplantation or systemic disease), do-not-resuscitate status, advanced directives restricting implementation of the protocol
- Delayed admission to ICU from emergency department (more than 4 hours), or fluid resuscitation previous to ICU with more than 1,500 cc
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Universidad Nacional de La Platalead
- Clínica Bazterricacollaborator
- Sanatorio Otamendi y Mirolicollaborator
- National Agency for Scientific and Technological Promotion, Argentinacollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Clinica Bazterrica
Buenos Aires, 1425, Argentina
Clínica Santa Isabel
Buenos Aires, 1425, Argentina
Sanatorio Otamendi y Miroli
Buenos Aires, 1425, Argentina
Related Publications (1)
Dubin A, Pozo MO, Casabella CA, Murias G, Palizas F Jr, Moseinco MC, Kanoore Edul VS, Palizas F, Estenssoro E, Ince C. Comparison of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 and saline solution for resuscitation of the microcirculation during the early goal-directed therapy of septic patients. J Crit Care. 2010 Dec;25(4):659.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.04.007. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
PMID: 20813485DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Arnaldo Dubin, MD
Sanatorio Otamendi y Miroli
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 28, 2008
First Posted
December 1, 2008
Study Start
January 1, 2006
Primary Completion
August 1, 2009
Study Completion
August 1, 2009
Last Updated
September 15, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-09