Vasopressin Versus Catecholamines for Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Control in Brain Injured Trauma Patients
AVP
1 other identifier
interventional
96
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is among the leading causes of trauma death and disability in both civilian and military populations. The damage that occurs at the instant of trauma cannot be modified; the secondary injuries that occur afterward are the impediments to recovery and can be influenced by the physician. Cerebral ischemia is the most important secondary event that determines outcome following TBI. To minimize ischemic episodes once the patient has arrived at the hospital, most treatments are aimed at optimizing cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). The cornerstones of these treatments include mannitol, to reduce intracranial pressure (ICP), and catecholamines, such as phenylephrine (PE), to increase mean arterial pressure (MAP), but these agents have undesired side effects. Nevertheless, once they lose potency, there are few alternatives. The main objective of this proposal to develop a new therapeutic option for CPP management in TBI patients using arginine vasopressin (AVP). AVP is the endogenous anti-diuretic hormone. It is FDA-approved for use in the diagnosis and treatment of diabetes insipidus, for the prevention and treatment of post-operative abdominal distention, and in abdominal radiography to dispel interfering gas shadows. It has been used off-label for several other conditions. There is minimal information on its therapeutic potential after TBI. The investigators have demonstrated that AVP during fluid resuscitation rapidly restored hemodynamics, CPP, and improves acute survival in a clinically-relevant model of TBI. The investigators observed similar short term benefits after chest and liver trauma. Nevertheless, AVP has actions that could mask any short term benefit. The investigators have already defined risks and benefits of AVP therapy, relative to PE, in four different clinically-relevant laboratory model. The investigators now plan to evaluate this new therapy relative to the current evidence-based guideline for CPP management in TBI patients. The working hypothesis is that the risk/benefit profile for AVP is equal, or superior to, PE at equi-effective doses for the management of CPP following TBI. A corollary is that a higher CPP can be safely tolerated with AVP vs catecholamines. THE INVESTIGATORS AIM TO: Determine whether AVP is safe and effective to maintain CPP = 60 mm Hg in TBI patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2008
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 20, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 21, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 12, 2014
CompletedDecember 12, 2014
December 1, 2014
6 years
November 20, 2008
December 1, 2014
December 11, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time ICP >20
The number of hours that participants remained with intracranial pressure above 20 mmHg
The number of hours during the first 5 days of intracranial pressure monitoring
Study Arms (2)
AVP, arginine vasopressin
ACTIVE COMPARATORVasopressin
Standard Catecholamine
ACTIVE COMPARATORlevophed, dopamine, phenylephrine)
Interventions
Titrated to cerebral perfusion pressure greater than 60 mm Hg
Titrated catecholamine of attending physicians preference to cerebral perfusion pressure greater than 60 mm Hg.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \>/= 18 yrs,
- Primary admission to the hospital within 8 h after injury
- Closed head injury
- Potential for intracranial pressure monitoring
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or nursing women
- Hemodynamic instability after initial resuscitation
- Vasopressor therapy for greater than 6 hours
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ryder Trauma Center
Miami, Florida, 33136, United States
Related Publications (4)
Dudkiewicz M, Proctor KG. Tissue oxygenation during management of cerebral perfusion pressure with phenylephrine or vasopressin. Crit Care Med. 2008 Sep;36(9):2641-50. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181847af3.
PMID: 18679110BACKGROUNDSanui M, King DR, Feinstein AJ, Varon AJ, Cohn SM, Proctor KG. Effects of arginine vasopressin during resuscitation from hemorrhagic hypotension after traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2006 Feb;34(2):433-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000196206.83534.39.
PMID: 16424725BACKGROUNDFeinstein AJ, Cohn SM, King DR, Sanui M, Proctor KG. Early vasopressin improves short-term survival after pulmonary contusion. J Trauma. 2005 Oct;59(4):876-82; discussion 882-3. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000187654.24146.22.
PMID: 16374276BACKGROUNDFeinstein AJ, Patel MB, Sanui M, Cohn SM, Majetschak M, Proctor KG. Resuscitation with pressors after traumatic brain injury. J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Oct;201(4):536-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.05.031.
PMID: 16183491BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Kenneth Proctor, PhD, Professor of Surgery
- Organization
- University of Miami
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kenneth G Proctor, PhD
University of Miami
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 20, 2008
First Posted
November 21, 2008
Study Start
September 1, 2008
Primary Completion
September 1, 2014
Study Completion
September 1, 2014
Last Updated
December 12, 2014
Results First Posted
December 12, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-12