Comparison of Three Methods of Hemoglobin Monitoring
1 other identifier
observational
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the hemoglobin results obtained with 1) the HemoCue™, 2) the Masimo SpHb™, and 3) the UCSF Clinical Laboratory. The goal is to determine if these three values differ from each other during various levels of blood loss in the clinical care of patients for spine revision and hip revision surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Apr 2009
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 14, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 18, 2008
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2010
CompletedMarch 7, 2013
March 1, 2013
1 year
November 14, 2008
March 6, 2013
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
See description below
Primary outcome is based on the difference between SpHb (Masimo SpHb™ continuous hemoglobin reading ) - tHb (laboratory hemoglobin determination).
A minimum of three differences recorded during surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
See description below
A minimum of three differences recorded during surgery
Study Arms (1)
spine or hip surgery
Eligibility Criteria
See inclusion/exclusion criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or non-pregnant female 18 y/o or older
- American Society of Anesthesiology Classification 1, 2 or 3
- Scheduled to undergo spine or hip revision surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or nursing
- Patients who in the study investigators clinical judgement would not be suitable for research.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
Related Publications (1)
Miller RD, Ward TA, Shiboski SC, Cohen NH. A comparison of three methods of hemoglobin monitoring in patients undergoing spine surgery. Anesth Analg. 2011 Apr;112(4):858-63. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31820eecd1. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
PMID: 21385985RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ronald D Miller, MD
University of California, San Francisco
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 14, 2008
First Posted
November 18, 2008
Study Start
April 1, 2009
Primary Completion
April 1, 2010
Study Completion
December 1, 2010
Last Updated
March 7, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-03