NCT00792532

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to gather observational data on an already FDA-approved implantation technique for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in which the entire surgery is performed within an MRI scanner ("interventional MRI", or iMRI). With this surgical technique, the patient is fully asleep (under general anesthesia) during DBS implantation. The standard method for the placement of deep brain stimulators does not use MRI during the actual DBS placement. The standard method involves placement of a rigid frame on the patient's head, performance of a short MRI scan, transport to the operating room, placement of the DBS electrodes in the operating room, and return to the MRI suite for another MR to confirm correct electrode placement. In the standard method, the patient must be awake for 2-4 hours in the operating room to have "brain mapping" performed, where the brain target is confirmed by passing "microelectrodes" (thin wires) into the brain to record its electrical activity. In the standard method, general anesthesia is not required. With the iMRI technique, the surgery is guided entirely by MRI images performed multiple times as the DBS electrode is advanced. This eliminates the need for the patient to be awake, and eliminates the need for passing microelectrodes into the brain before placing the permanent DBS electrode.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
8

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2003

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2003

Completed
5.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 14, 2008

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 18, 2008

Completed
10.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

December 18, 2019

Status Verified

December 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

15.7 years

First QC Date

November 14, 2008

Last Update Submit

December 16, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Parkinson's disease: The degree of benefit from baseline off medication UPDRS(part III) motor score to postoperative off medication scores at 12 months with stimulation on.

    12 months post-surgery

  • Dystonia: The percent change from baseline in the Burk-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia rating scale movement subscore to the 12 month postoperative subscore

    12 months post-surgery

Study Arms (1)

iMRI

Procedure: interventional MRI for implantation of DBS electrodesDevice: DBS electrodes

Interventions

DBS implantation will be performed entirely within a Phillips 3T MRI scanner

Also known as: interventional MR
iMRI

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes

iMRI

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Parkinson's disease, eligible for DBS

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of idiopathic PD with clinically significant motor fluctuations despite maximized anti-Parkinsonian therapy. This will be based on medical history, neurologic examination (the presence of at least 2 of the following: resting tremor, rigidity, or bradykinesia), and response to anti-Parkinsonian therapy.
  • Approximately 5 years' duration, relative to the date of surgery, since diagnosis of PD.
  • Age \>20 inclusive, on date of surgery.
  • The subject is ambulatory in their best on time (not wheelchair bound).
  • The subject is medically able to undergo the surgery as determined by clinical and laboratory evaluations and any other evaluations that are part of the standard practice at the institution in which the subject is to undergo surgery (e.g., subjects will have normal coagulation tests and normal platelet levels).
  • The subject is expected to be able to comply with and understand the required visit schedule and all required tests and procedures.
  • Signed IRB-approved informed consent is obtained before any study-specific procedure, including assessments required during the eligibility evaluation period.

You may not qualify if:

  • In the judgment of the investigator, a history of any clinically significant medical, psychiatric, or laboratory abnormality for which participation in the study would pose a safety risk to the subject.
  • History of treatment of PD by any procedure involving intracranial surgery or implantation of a device.
  • MRI of the brain within 12 months before the surgery which demonstrates an intracranial abnormality that would contraindicate surgery (e.g. stroke, tumor, vascular abnormality affecting the DBS target area).
  • Any disorder that precludes a surgical procedure (e.g., signs of sepsis or inadequately treated infection) or alters wound healing.
  • Receipt of antiplatelet agents for at least 10 days prior surgery.
  • Significant cognitive impairment based on investigator assessment during the eligibility evaluation period.
  • History of significant psychiatric illness, epilepsy, or Alzheimer's disease.
  • Active drug or alcohol abuse.
  • Pregnancy or lack of effective contraception in women of childbearing potential defined as one year post-menopausal or surgically sterile.
  • Treatment with non anti-Parkinsonian agents (e.g., atypical neuroleptics) that may affect symptoms of PD within 60 days before entering the study.
  • Any medical disability (e.g., severe degenerative arthritis, compromised nutritional state, severe peripheral neuropathy) that would interfere with the assessment of safety and efficacy in this trial.
  • Inability to follow-up with post-operative study visits
  • Inability to speak or read English
  • Dystonia diagnosed by a movement disorders neurologist
  • Significant functional impairment despite optimal medical management, including failed botulinum toxin therapy if appropriate
  • +13 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

San Francisco VA Medical Center

San Francisco, California, 94121, United States

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Martin AJ, Larson PS, Ostrem JL, Keith Sootsman W, Talke P, Weber OM, Levesque N, Myers J, Starr PA. Placement of deep brain stimulator electrodes using real-time high-field interventional magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2005 Nov;54(5):1107-14. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20675.

  • Ostrem JL, Ziman N, Galifianakis NB, Starr PA, Luciano MS, Katz M, Racine CA, Martin AJ, Markun LC, Larson PS. Clinical outcomes using ClearPoint interventional MRI for deep brain stimulation lead placement in Parkinson's disease. J Neurosurg. 2016 Apr;124(4):908-16. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.JNS15173. Epub 2015 Oct 23.

  • Starr PA, Markun LC, Larson PS, Volz MM, Martin AJ, Ostrem JL. Interventional MRI-guided deep brain stimulation in pediatric dystonia: first experience with the ClearPoint system. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014 Oct;14(4):400-8. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.PEDS13605. Epub 2014 Aug 1.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Parkinson DiseaseDystonia

Interventions

Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Parkinsonian DisordersBasal Ganglia DiseasesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesMovement DisordersSynucleinopathiesNeurodegenerative DiseasesDyskinesiasNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Minimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, Operative

Study Officials

  • Philip Starr, M.D., Ph.D.

    University of California, San Francisco; SFVAMC

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Paul Larson, M.D.

    University of California, San Francisco; SFVAMC

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Jill L Ostrem, MD

    University of California San Francisco, SFVAMC

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Alastair J Martin, PhD

    University of California, San Francisco

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2008

First Posted

November 18, 2008

Study Start

July 1, 2003

Primary Completion

March 1, 2019

Study Completion

March 1, 2019

Last Updated

December 18, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-12

Locations