NCT00787800

Brief Summary

The RAPTURE Study will determine whether dual chamber defibrillators with atrial prevention and termination therapies, minimized ventricular pacing, and remote monitoring will reduce the rate of inappropriate shocks and improve quality of life compared to optimally programmed back-up pacing only single chamber ICDs when used for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2008

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
2 countries

4 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2008

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 6, 2008

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 10, 2008

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2010

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2011

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 11, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

July 24, 2014

Status Verified

July 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

November 6, 2008

Results QC Date

May 21, 2013

Last Update Submit

July 2, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

Shock preventionSingle vs. Dual ChamberReduce ventricular pacingAtrial FibrillationRemote MonitoringICDImplantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Subjects Inappropriately Shocked by Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD)

    An inappropriate shock is defined as a shock delivered by the ICD during a rhythm other than sustained VT/VF (ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation).

    Baseline to 12 months after ICD implantation

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Number of Atrial Tachyarrhythmia Episodes Lasting Over 5 Minutes

    Baseline to 12 Months

  • Number of Appropriate Shocks by ICD

    Baseline to 12 Months

  • Total Cost of ICD Implantation Procedure

    Baseline

  • Number of Subjects With Newly Detected Atrial Tachyarrhythmias

    Baseline to 12 months after ICD implantation

  • Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Burden

    Implantation through 1 year

Study Arms (2)

Dual Chamber ICD

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Dual chamber Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD): Atrial therapies and minimized ventricular pacing will be programmed on along with Ventricular Tachycardia/Ventricular Fibrillation (VT/VF) detection and therapies with detection enhancements; remote monitoring set to alert for sustained atrial fibrillation.

Device: Dual Chamber ICD

Single Chamber ICD

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Single chamber Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator: Optimally programmed Ventricular Tachycardia/Ventricular Fibrillation (VT/VF) detection and therapies will be programmed on including use of detection enhancements.

Device: Single Chamber ICD

Interventions

Dual Chamber ICD: Atrial therapies and minimized ventricular pacing will be programmed on along with VT/VF detection and therapies with detection enhancements; remote monitoring set to alert for sustained atrial fibrillation Dual Chamber ICD Atrial prevention and termination therapies, Managed Ventricular Pacing (MVP)along with VT/VF detection and therapies for dual chamber device.

Also known as: Virtuoso DR D154AWG
Dual Chamber ICD

Single Chamber: Optimally programmed VT/VF detection and therapies will be programmed on including use of detection enhancements. VT/VF detection and therapies with discrimination criteria for single chamber device.

Also known as: Virtuoso VR D154VWC
Single Chamber ICD

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Candidates for ICD for primary prevention according to American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) guidelines who have a clinical indication for ICD implantation for ventricular arrhythmia or sudden death prevention.
  • The ability to understand the scope of the study, provide written informed consent, and a willingness to complete all study visits and associated procedures.

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant women
  • Age \<18 years old
  • Inability to provide consent
  • On a heart transplant waiting list
  • Life expectancy \<1 year
  • Indication for pacing
  • Atrioventricular (AV) node ablation
  • Permanent atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter
  • Indication for cardiac resynchronization
  • Preexisting, separate pacemaker pulse generator that won't be explanted
  • Intra-aortic balloon pump or other device
  • Inotropic drug (not digitalis) necessary for hemodynamic support
  • Chronic serious bacterial infection
  • Inability to receive pectoral non-thoracotomy lead ICD
  • Inability to program device according to protocol
  • +1 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

Mayo Clinic

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Location

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States

Location

Carmel Medical Center

Haifa, Israel

Location

Sheba Medical Center

Ramat Gan, Israel

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Deisenhofer I, Kolb C, Ndrepepa G, Schreieck J, Karch M, Schmieder S, Zrenner B, Schmitt C. Do current dual chamber cardioverter defibrillators have advantages over conventional single chamber cardioverter defibrillators in reducing inappropriate therapies? A randomized, prospective study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2001 Feb;12(2):134-42. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2001.00134.x.

    PMID: 11232608BACKGROUND
  • Friedman PA, McClelland RL, Bamlet WR, Acosta H, Kessler D, Munger TM, Kavesh NG, Wood M, Daoud E, Massumi A, Schuger C, Shorofsky S, Wilkoff B, Glikson M. Dual-chamber versus single-chamber detection enhancements for implantable defibrillator rhythm diagnosis: the detect supraventricular tachycardia study. Circulation. 2006 Jun 27;113(25):2871-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.594531. Epub 2006 Jun 12.

    PMID: 16769912BACKGROUND
  • Theuns DA, Rivero-Ayerza M, Boersma E, Jordaens L. Prevention of inappropriate therapy in implantable defibrillators: A meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing single-chamber and dual-chamber arrhythmia discrimination algorithms. Int J Cardiol. 2008 Apr 25;125(3):352-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.02.041. Epub 2007 Apr 18.

    PMID: 17445918BACKGROUND
  • Sweeney MO, Bank AJ, Nsah E, Koullick M, Zeng QC, Hettrick D, Sheldon T, Lamas GA; Search AV Extension and Managed Ventricular Pacing for Promoting Atrioventricular Conduction (SAVE PACe) Trial. Minimizing ventricular pacing to reduce atrial fibrillation in sinus-node disease. N Engl J Med. 2007 Sep 6;357(10):1000-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa071880.

    PMID: 17804844BACKGROUND
  • Friedman PA, Bradley D, Koestler C, Slusser J, Hodge D, Bailey K, Kusumoto F, Munger TM, Militanu A, Glikson M. A prospective randomized trial of single- or dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillators to minimize inappropriate shock risk in primary sudden cardiac death prevention. Europace. 2014 Oct;16(10):1460-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu022. Epub 2014 Jun 13.

    PMID: 24928948BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Tachycardia, VentricularVentricular FibrillationAtrial FibrillationTachycardia, Supraventricular

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

TachycardiaArrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesCardiac Conduction System DiseasePathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Paul A. Friedman, MD, Professor of Medicine
Organization
Mayo Clinic

Study Officials

  • Paul A Friedman, MD

    Mayo Clinic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2008

First Posted

November 10, 2008

Study Start

November 1, 2008

Primary Completion

December 1, 2010

Study Completion

December 1, 2011

Last Updated

July 24, 2014

Results First Posted

June 11, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-07

Locations