Investigating Modes of Progressive Mobility
1 other identifier
interventional
82
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of specific activities with and without an early therapeutic mobility (ETM) protocol among patients who experience three or more days of mechanical ventilation. A second purpose is to examine staff/delivery system and patient factors that influence the initiation and progression of activity with and without an ETM protocol. The hypothesis is that ETM protocols will result in improved patient outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Nov 2007
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 6, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 7, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2009
CompletedJuly 3, 2009
July 1, 2009
1.4 years
November 6, 2008
July 2, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Compare immediate molecular and physiological patient responses to activity with responses to an ETM protocol.
1, 2, 3, 7, days then weekly
Secondary Outcomes (1)
A secondary aim is to identify strategies and conditions that promote or prevent ETM.
1, 3, 5, 7, days then weekly
Study Arms (2)
1
NO INTERVENTIONRA begins data collection with chart review for demographic and explanatory variables, collects data for baseline muscle strength. During standard care period, PM will obtain information about the plan for activity for enrolled patients (turning, complete or partial weight-bearing i.e., reverse Trendelenberg positioning, ROM, sitting and walking) through discussion with the direct providers. RA will interview one provider about factors which influence the decision to implement activity or provide bedrest, including the presence of orders for bedrest or physical therapy. If activity is planned, the PM will observe and record the type and duration of activity, drawing serum biomarkers 20 minutes before and 20 minutes after the activity. If no activity is planned or activity duration is less than 10 minutes, serum for only baseline inflammatory biomarkers will be drawn. The RA will collect outcomes data within 24 hours of discharge from the ICU.
2
EXPERIMENTALIdentical procedures for date recruitment, consent and data collection will occur. In this phase, the Project Manager will promote the use of the ETM protocol through coaching (e.g., reminding staff of benefits of mobility, identification of available resources, or suggesting cessation of bedrest orders) and by participating in planning at least one 20-minute activity.
Interventions
ETM is 4 levels. Level 1, each receives repositioning from lateral to supine positions at even hours, totaling 60 minutes of activity/positioning over 24 hours. If tolerated, two periods of 20 minutes of supine position with a reverse trendelenberg position of 15-20 degrees will be used to promote orthostasis. Level 2 is turning every 2 hours, positioning in reverse trendelenberg at 15-25 degrees as tolerated, active resistance with ICU staff for 20 minutes daily for a total of 60-80 minutes of activity/positioning daily. At Level 3, 2 times 20 minutes of a sitting are added to active ROM and inbed turning (estimated 80-100 total minutes of activity daily). Sitting is in bed or with non-weightbearing assisted transfer to chair with backrest elevation at 75-90 degrees and legs in a dependent position. Level 3 interventions; minimal weight-bearing. Level 4, weight-bearing transfer to chair and ambulation are added to inbed turning.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- P:F ratio \> 100
- FiO2 \< 60% and PEEP less than 10 cmH20
- hemodynamic stability ten minutes after turning (i.e., heart rate (HR) and/or systolic blood pressure (BP) changes less than 20% of baseline)
- baseline (rest) vitals signs of HR 50-110
- mean arterial pressure (MAP) 60-100 mmHg
- peripheral oxygenation saturation (SpO2) greater than 88%
- Sufficient cognition for progression to levels 2-4 of ETM to assist with out of bed positioning or movement
- a high degree of dependency on others for positioning is acceptable
You may not qualify if:
- End-stage muscular dystrophy
- myasthenia gravis
- new quadriplegia
- coma
- increased intracranial pressure
- unrepaired hip fracture and multiple lower extremity fractures
- Patients experiencing active titration of intravenous vasoactive medications (e.g. dopamine, epinephrine, or norepinepherine) will be excluded
- concurrent use of a continuous lateral rotation bed
- patients for high risk of death will also be excluded
- MICU admission following a hospital stay of \>9 days in the past months
- age \>80 in the presence of 2 or more life-threatening illnesses
- diagnosis of an active stage IV malignancy
- status post cardiac arrest
- diagnosis of intracerebral hemorrhage requiring mechanical ventilation
- subjects over 400 pounds can be excluded from mobilization based on the judgment of the bedside nurse or project manager; if the risk for staff or patient harm from moving a patient with excessive weight is considered likely, mobilization will not occur.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hill-Romlead
Related Publications (1)
Morris PE, Goad A, Thompson C, Taylor K, Harry B, Passmore L, Ross A, Anderson L, Baker S, Sanchez M, Penley L, Howard A, Dixon L, Leach S, Small R, Hite RD, Haponik E. Early intensive care unit mobility therapy in the treatment of acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med. 2008 Aug;36(8):2238-43. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318180b90e.
PMID: 18596631BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chris Winkelman, PhD
Case Western Reserve University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 6, 2008
First Posted
November 7, 2008
Study Start
November 1, 2007
Primary Completion
April 1, 2009
Study Completion
July 1, 2009
Last Updated
July 3, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-07