Investigation of Efficiency of Breathing With Different Breathing Patterns
1 other identifier
interventional
26
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Our aim in this study is to investigate the efficiency of the breathing with different breathing patterns. Ten volunteers and twenty patients having respiratory problems will be coached on their breathing through specific masks which will provide four different breathing patterns. These patterns will be 1) Breathing in through the nose only and out through the mouth only 2) Breathing in through the mouth only and out through the nose only 3) Breathing in and out through the nose only 4) Breathing in and out through the mouth only The data obtained from volunteers and patients will be compared within and between the groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2007
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 30, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 3, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2011
CompletedDecember 2, 2014
December 1, 2014
3.6 years
October 30, 2008
December 1, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Determining the anatomic dead space change at variable tidal volumes with four different breathing patterns (nose-in and nose-out, mouth-in and mouth-out, nose-in and mouth-out, mouth-in and nose-out) in healthy volunteers.
3 months
Comparing the efficiency of CO2 removal at given minute ventilations with the four different breathing patterns in patients with chronic respiratory failure.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Comparing the efficiency of the study mask which forces subjects to breathe in a manner similar to pursed lip breathing and a regular facemask in healthy volunteers and patients with respiratory failure
6 months
Study Arms (2)
Volunteers
OTHERTen healthy volunteers
Patients
OTHERSixteen patients with respiratory insufficiency
Interventions
All subjects will breathe in four different breathing patterns which are provided by specific masks. Patterns are as the following: 1. Breathing in through the nose only and out through the mouth only 2. Breathing in through the mouth only and out through the nose only 3. Breathing in and out through the nose only 4. Breathing in and out through the mouth only
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- For healthy subjects:
- \. Ten healthy adult (\> 18 years of age) volunteers will be recruited from the MGH main campus through intra-hospital e-mail broadcasting. Subjects with the following issues will be excluded from the study.
- For patients with respiratory insufficiency:
- Twenty adult (\> 18 years of age) patients will be recruited. These patients will be either patients in acute respiratory failure resulting from COPD exacerbation breathing spontaneously only receiving nasal oxygen admitted to the medical floors of the MGH; or patients with diagnosed stable COPD on home oxygen therapy seen by pulmonary physicians in the outpatient clinics or coming to the MGH as study subjects.
You may not qualify if:
- For healthy volunteers:
- Subjects with facial deformity, heavy beard or moustache which prevents good seal between the mask and the face;
- Subjects who have claustrophobia and cannot wear the mask.
- For patients with respiratory insufficiency:
- Patients with facial deformity, heavy beard or moustache which prevents a good seal between the mask and the face;
- Patients who have claustrophobia and cannot wear the mask.
- Patients who are hemodynamically unstable.
- Patients requiring continuous noninvasive positive pressure ventilation or endotracheal intubation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Massachusetts General Hospital, Respiratory Care Laboratory
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Related Publications (1)
Sulemanji DS, Bao F, Jiang Y, Kacmarek RM. A unidirectional breathing pattern improves breathing efficiency in subjects with severe COPD. Respir Care. 2014 Oct;59(10):1487-93. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02899. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
PMID: 24782549DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yandong Jiang, MD, PhD
Massachusetts General Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Anesthesia
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 30, 2008
First Posted
November 3, 2008
Study Start
November 1, 2007
Primary Completion
June 1, 2011
Study Completion
June 1, 2011
Last Updated
December 2, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-12