Study Stopped
recent research indicates Lucentis to be an effictive treatment
Utility of Intravitreal Methotrexate in Diabetic Macular Edema Resistant to Conventional Therapies
Evaluation of the Utility of Intravitreal Methotrexate in Patients With Recalcitrant Diabetic Macular Edema in an Open Label, Nonrandomized, Uncontrolled, Interventional Pilot Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
2
1 country
1
Brief Summary
It is well known that blindness is one of the most feared disabilities expressed by patients in the United States. Estimates of the economic impact of visual disability in the current population exceed 30 million US dollars in this country alone. The reasons for this figure are many; however age related macular degeneration (ARMD), diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma and uveitis are responsible for the majority of permanent visual disability and hence the costs in both quality of life and placing an economic burden on society. Research that may help reverse various abnormal biological responses that lead to or worsen clinical manifestations of diabetic retinopathy would be valuable.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2011
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 22, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 24, 2008
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 30, 2014
CompletedJanuary 23, 2018
November 1, 2017
11 months
October 22, 2008
May 27, 2014
December 26, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
30% Decrease in One Subfield Thickness on Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) 4 Weeks After the Last Intraocular Injection
4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Number of Participants With Increase in Visual Acuity (VA) Two Lines or More at the End of One Month After the Last Intraocular Injection
1 month
Secondary Would be Significant Clinical Improvement (Judged at the Slit Lamp Exam Using a 90D Lens) in Macular Edema at the End of One Month After the Last Intraocular Injection.
1 month
Study Arms (1)
Methotrexate 25mg/ml
OTHERMethotrexate intravenous 25mg/ml: Methotrexate intravenous 25mg/ml delivered once or twice (based on the therapeutic response) over a period of 2 months maximum. Total dosage 400ug in each dose to subjects with diabetic macular edema resistant to conventional therapies.
Interventions
Methotrexate intravenous 25mg/ml delivered once or twice (based on the therapeutic response) over a period of 2 months maximum. Total dosage 400ug in each dose. Statistical analysis would not be applicable in this small sample.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients (18 years and older) with clinically significant macular edema (CSME) with visual acuity less than 20/60 to Hand motion in the study eye.
- Patients should have persistent CSME three months after laser therapy or three months after intraocular injection of Avastin or triamcinolone. These interventions could be multiple or combined.
- Optical coherence tomography (OCT) scan demonstrating more than 275 microns retinal thickness in central subfield of study eye.
- Ability to understand study instructions, interventions and potential complications.
- History of reasonably controlled Diabetes mellitus (DM), ≤ 8.5HbA1c that has been evaluated in the last 3 months.
- Ability to undergo contraceptive protection during and 3 months after intraocular injections.
- Clear demonstration (in female patients) of commitment to avoid pregnancy and a negative urine pregnancy test at baseline for women of childbearing potential.
- Clear understanding of teratogenic potential of MTX.
You may not qualify if:
- History of allergy to MTX.
- An ocular condition is present such that, in the opinion of the investigator, visual acuity loss would not improve from resolution of macular edema (e.g., foveal atrophy, pigment abnormalities, dense subfoveal hard exudates, nonretinal condition.
- An ocular condition is present (other than diabetes) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect macular edema or alter visual acuity during the course of the study (e.g., vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, epiretinal membrane, etc.).
- An eye treated for Glaucoma
- Eyes that underwent vitrectomy
- History of intraocular malignancies.
- Intraocular surgery with the prior 3 months.
- Recent significant change in diabetic medications.
- Insulin usage less than a year.
- Life threatening co morbidities such as cancer under therapy.
- Use of oral, intravenous, periocular or intraocular corticosteroids (steroids) in prior 3 months.
- Liver function that exceeds three times the upper limit of normal at baseline, or within 6 weeks of that appointment.
- Pregnant females.
- Vitreous hemorrhage (active) in study eye
- Anticipation of the need for laser pan retinal photocoagulation in the next 6 months.
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Wake Forest Baptist Health Eye Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
Related Publications (6)
Rein DB, Zhang P, Wirth KE, Lee PP, Hoerger TJ, McCall N, Klein R, Tielsch JM, Vijan S, Saaddine J. The economic burden of major adult visual disorders in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Dec;124(12):1754-60. doi: 10.1001/archopht.124.12.1754.
PMID: 17159036BACKGROUNDShimura M, Nakazawa T, Yasuda K, Shiono T, Iida T, Sakamoto T, Nishida K. Comparative therapy evaluation of intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone acetonide on persistent diffuse diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 May;145(5):854-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.12.031. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
PMID: 18328456BACKGROUNDVasconcelos-Santos DV, Nehemy PG, Schachat AP, Nehemy MB. Secondary ocular hypertension after intravitreal injection of 4 mg of triamcinolone acetonide: incidence and risk factors. Retina. 2008 Apr;28(4):573-80. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31816079e8.
PMID: 18398360BACKGROUNDHartley KL, Smiddy WE, Flynn HW Jr, Murray TG. Pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for diabetic macular edema. Retina. 2008 Mar;28(3):410-9. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31816102f2.
PMID: 18327132BACKGROUNDHardwig PW, Pulido JS, Erie JC, Baratz KH, Buettner H. Intraocular methotrexate in ocular diseases other than primary central nervous system lymphoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Nov;142(5):883-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.06.002.
PMID: 17056381BACKGROUNDGhajarnia M, Kurup S, Eller A. The therapeutic effects of intravitreal bevacizumab in a patient with recalcitrant idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Semin Ophthalmol. 2007 Apr-Jun;22(2):127-31. doi: 10.1080/08820530701421635.
PMID: 17564935BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Shree Kurup
- Organization
- Wake Forest Baptist Health Eye Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shree K Kurup, MD
Wake Forest Baptist Health Eye Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 22, 2008
First Posted
October 24, 2008
Study Start
September 1, 2011
Primary Completion
August 1, 2012
Study Completion
August 1, 2012
Last Updated
January 23, 2018
Results First Posted
June 30, 2014
Record last verified: 2017-11