LINX Reflux Management System Clinical Study Protocol
1 other identifier
interventional
100
2 countries
14
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the LINX Reflux Management System in the treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2008
Typical duration for not_applicable
14 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 20, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 22, 2008
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 13, 2013
CompletedMay 4, 2018
March 1, 2018
2.1 years
October 20, 2008
April 25, 2012
April 3, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Rate of Occurrence for Device and Procedure Related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs).
SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence, whether related to the study device or procedure or not, that meets one or more of the following criteria: * Results in death * Is life-threatening * Requires subject hospitalization \> 24 hours * Requires prolongation of an existing hospitalization * Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity * Results in fetal distress, fetal death, or a congenital anomaly or birth defect * Requires intervention to prevent permanent impairment or damage. Outcome measure reports number of subjects with reported events.
through 24 months
Normalization of Esophageal Acid Exposure Time or Reduced Total Acid Exposure Time of at Least 50% Compared to the Subject's Baseline Measurement by Esophageal pH Testing.
The analysis cohort for the primary efficacy analysis was the treated population which includes all implanted subjects and was determined through esophageal pH testing.
12 Months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
At Least a 50% Reduction in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) Total Score Compared to Baseline
12 months
Average Daily Proton-pump Inhibitor (PPI) Dosage Reduced by at Least 50% Compared to Baseline
12 months
Study Arms (1)
Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation
OTHERSingle-arm study: all subjects were treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation. A subject's baseline measurements prior to sphincter augmentation were compared to post-sphincter augmentation measurements. Subjects served as their own control.
Interventions
The area of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) is accessed using a standard laparoscopic approach. The tubular esophagus, in the area of the LES, is sized and the appropriately sized sphincter augmentation device is placed circumferentially around the esophagus in the area of the LES. After confirming proper placement, the ends of the device are secured. At this point, the implant procedure is complete, laparoscopic instruments are withdrawn and access points are closed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject must be at least 18 years of age and at least the minimum Age of Majority according to applicable State or Country Law and must be less than 75 years of age, with a life expectancy \> 3 years
- Subject is a suitable surgical candidate, i.e. is able to undergo general anesthesia and laparoscopic surgery
- Documented typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) for longer than 6 months (regurgitation or heartburn which is defined as a burning epigastic or substernal pain which responds to acid neutralization or suppression)
- Patient requires daily proton pump inhibitor or other anti-reflux drug therapy
- Total Distal Ambulatory Esophageal pH must meet the following criteria: pH\< 4 for ≥ 4.5% of the time Note: Subjects shall have discontinued any GERD medications for at least 7 days prior to testing.
- Subjects with symptomatic improvement on proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy demonstrated by a GERD-Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) score of ≤ 10 on proton-pump inhibitors and ≥ 15 off PPIs, or subjects with a ≥ 6 point improvement when comparing their on PPI and off PPI GERD-HRQL score
- GERD symptoms, in absence of PPI therapy (minimum 7 days)
- If the subject is of child bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test within one week prior to implant and must agree to use effective means of birth control during the course of the study
- Subject is willing and able to cooperate with follow-up examinations
- Subject has been informed of the study procedures and the treatment and has signed an informed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- The procedure is an emergency procedure
- Currently being treated with another investigational drug or investigational device
- History of gastroesophageal surgery, anti-reflux procedures, or gastroesophageal/gastric cancer
- Any previous endoscopic anti-reflux intervention for GERD
- Suspected or confirmed esophageal or gastric cancer
- Any size hiatal hernia \>3cm as determined by endoscopy
- Distal esophageal motility (average of sensors 3 and 4) is less than 35 mmHg peristaltic amplitude on wet swallows or \<70% (propulsive) peristaltic sequences
- Esophagitis - Grade C or D (LA Classification)
- Body Mass Index (BMI)\>35
- Symptoms of dysphagia more than once per week within the last 3 months.
- Diagnosed with Scleroderma
- Diagnosed with an esophageal motility disorder such as but not limited to Achalasia, Nutcracker Esophagus, or Diffuse Esophageal Spasm or Hypertensive LES
- Subject has a history of or known esophageal stricture or gross esophageal anatomic abnormalities (Schatzki's ring, obstructive lesions, etc.)
- Subject has esophageal or gastric varices
- Subject has history of or known Barrett's esophagus
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (14)
USC Keck School of Medicine
Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States
University of California - San Diego
San Diego, California, 92103, United States
Mayo Clinic
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224, United States
Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital
Albany, Georgia, 31701, United States
Abbott Northwestern Hospital/MNGI
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407, United States
Washington University - Division of Gastroenterology
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642, United States
The Ohio State University Medical Center / Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Knox Community Hospital
Mount Vernon, Ohio, 43050, United States
Legacy Health System
Portland, Oregon, 97210, United States
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States
Gundersen Lutheran Clinic
La Crosse, Wisconsin, 54601, United States
Academic Medical Center
Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Netherlands
Related Publications (2)
Ganz RA, Edmundowicz SA, Taiganides PA, Lipham JC, Smith CD, DeVault KR, Horgan S, Jacobsen G, Luketich JD, Smith CC, Schlack-Haerer SC, Kothari SN, Dunst CM, Watson TJ, Peters J, Oelschlager BK, Perry KA, Melvin S, Bemelman WA, Smout AJ, Dunn D. Long-term Outcomes of Patients Receiving a Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device for Gastroesophageal Reflux. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 May;14(5):671-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.05.028. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
PMID: 26044316DERIVEDGanz RA, Peters JH, Horgan S, Bemelman WA, Dunst CM, Edmundowicz SA, Lipham JC, Luketich JD, Melvin WS, Oelschlager BK, Schlack-Haerer SC, Smith CD, Smith CC, Dunn D, Taiganides PA. Esophageal sphincter device for gastroesophageal reflux disease. N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 21;368(8):719-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205544.
PMID: 23425164DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Amy Derosier, VP of Clinical Affairs
- Organization
- Torax Medical
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 20, 2008
First Posted
October 22, 2008
Study Start
November 1, 2008
Primary Completion
December 1, 2010
Study Completion
September 1, 2011
Last Updated
May 4, 2018
Results First Posted
November 13, 2013
Record last verified: 2018-03