Eyelash Growth From Application of Bimatoprost in Gel Suspension to the Base of the Eyelashes
Effect of Bimatoprost (Lumigan) in Gel Suspension Applied to the Eyelashes on Eyelash Growth
1 other identifier
interventional
21
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objective: To determine if Lumigan (bimatoprost) causes increased lash length when used in gel suspension applied to the base of the eyelashes. Methods: Subjects recruited from the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute were screened and those who met inclusion criteria were enrolled. Each participant received two vials of gel suspension, which contained bimatoprost and normal saline, respectively, each mixed 1:1 with GonakTM gel and labeled "right eye" and "left eye" according to randomization. The suspension was applied to the eyelashes every evening on the designated eye for 6 weeks. Lash length was measured with a caliper at enrollment, at weekly intervals during the study and at 1 and 3 months after study completion. Visual acuity, ocular symptoms, intraocular pressure and photographs were documented at these same intervals. Results: The average eyelash growth in the Lumigan group was 2.01mm (vs. control average of 1.13mm) which was a statistically significant difference (p=0.009). The average intraocular pressure decreased equally in both groups (2.14 mmHg). No change in visual acuity or iris discoloration was noted in any of the subjects. Discussion: Our data showed an increase in eyelash length with use of Lumigan in gel suspension, suggesting that it may have eyelash lengthening properties.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2008
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 15, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 16, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 16, 2014
CompletedApril 16, 2014
March 1, 2014
5 months
October 15, 2008
June 22, 2013
March 20, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Efficacy of Bimatoprost in Lengthening of Eyelashes
Eyelash growth after application of bimatoprost vs control (split face study).
4.5 months (6 weeks of drug application and 3 months after discontinuing)
Study Arms (1)
Bimatoprost Suspension
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntervention to be administered: Each subject was given two suspensions, one mixed with Bimatoprost and one mixed with normal saline. They were instructed to use each suspension to a pre-determined eyelash (prepared prior to study enrollment in double blind fashion and marked after randomization with right and left). The intervention was the one eye with the Bimatoprost.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age greater than 20 and less than 90 and patients who have previously used and are comfortable with applying mascara.
You may not qualify if:
- History of glaucoma, uveitis, pregnancy, allergic reaction to prostaglandins or the gel suspension, alopecia, and previous usage of other eyelash growth enhancement.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Miami, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute
Miami, Florida, 33136, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
A larger and longer term study would help assess the incidence of ocular side effects related to the Bimatoprost. This randomized controlled study evaluated patients after only 6 weeks of application of the drug.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Sara Wester
- Organization
- University of Miami
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wendy W Lee, MD
University of Miami
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 15, 2008
First Posted
October 16, 2008
Study Start
February 1, 2008
Primary Completion
July 1, 2008
Study Completion
July 1, 2008
Last Updated
April 16, 2014
Results First Posted
April 16, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-03