Effect of Intraoperative Volume Optimization on Outcome After Intrabdominal Surgery
EVOLUTION
3 other identifiers
interventional
104
1 country
6
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether intraoperative goal-directed fluid management (with goal = cardiac stroke volume maximization) based on respiratory-induced pulse pressure variation monitoring may improve outcome after intrabdominal surgery
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Feb 2009
Longer than P75 for phase_4
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 3, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 6, 2008
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2013
CompletedNovember 19, 2013
November 1, 2013
4.2 years
October 3, 2008
November 18, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Total number of patients with complications
first 7 postoperative days
Secondary Outcomes (7)
total number of complications
first 7 postoperative days
SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) score
postoperative days 1 and 5
Time to initial passage of flatus and feces
postoperative
duration of stay in intensive care unit
postoperative
Duration of hospital stay
postoperative
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Optimization
EXPERIMENTALvolume optimization: continuous monitoring of the respiratory-induced arterial pulse pressure variation during surgery and systematic minimization to 10% or less by volume loading
control; standard volume administration
ACTIVE COMPARATORstandard volume administration
Interventions
Fluid management: * basal fluid administration = 5 ml/kg/h lactated Ringer's solution \+ systematic minimization of the arterial pulse pressure variation (PPV) to 10% or less by volume loading (6% hydroxyethyl starch) throughout surgery * hypovolemia suspected : fluids (1. crystalloids, 2. 6% hydroxyethyl starch) only if PPV is \> 10%
Fluid management: * basal fluid administration = 5 ml/kg/h lactated Ringer's solution * hypovolemia suspected : fluids (1. crystalloids, 2. 6% hydroxyethyl starch) according to predetermined algorithm primarily based on mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and urine output, and secondary on PPV
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- major elective intrabdominal surgery
You may not qualify if:
- arrhythmia
- hepatectomy
- associated thoracic surgery
- laparoscopy
- pregnancy
- allergy to colloid solution or anesthesia protocol
- arterial catheter not possible
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (6)
University Hospital
Amiens, 80054, France
University Hospital
Caen, 14033, France
Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Estaing, CHU
Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, France
University hospital Henri-Mondor
Créteil, 94010, France
University Hospital
Lille, 59000, France
University Hospital
Rouen, 76031, France
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Benoit TAVERNIER, MD, PhD
University Hospital, Lille
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Benoit VALLET, MD, PhD
University Hospital, Lille
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 3, 2008
First Posted
October 6, 2008
Study Start
February 1, 2009
Primary Completion
April 1, 2013
Study Completion
April 1, 2013
Last Updated
November 19, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-11