Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis Study
RSP
Encore Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis
1 other identifier
interventional
516
1 country
25
Brief Summary
The objective of this clinical study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Encore Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis (RSP). The clinical results of the RSP will be compared to clinical results published in literature for rotator cuff arthropathy and salvage procedures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Oct 2002
Longer than P75 for phase_3
25 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2002
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 30, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 2, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 19, 2011
CompletedApril 19, 2011
March 1, 2011
5.7 years
September 30, 2008
November 19, 2010
March 21, 2011
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score
The patient self-report section of the ASES is a condition specific scale which is intended to measure functional limitations and pain of the shoulder. On a scale of 0 to 100, the use of their shoulder is measured with 0 = no use and 100 = full use. The assessment is done in two sections. One Pain (measured by the Visual Analog Pain Scale) and the second is a list of 10 questions referred to as the Activities of Daily Living. The results are calculated with the following equation: \[(10 - Visual analog scale pain score) x 5\] + \[(5/3) x Cumulative ADL score\]
2-year
Average Range of Motion
Physician's assessment of a subject's range of motion in degrees.
2-year
Subject Satisfaction With Surgery
Each subject had a chance to rate their satisfaction with surgery at each study interval.
2-year
Have Surgery Again?
Subject satisfaction: subject's willingness to have surgery performed again if necessary.
2-year
Neer's "Limited Goals"
To meet Neer's limited goals, a subject must report: none, slight or moderate pain with unusual activity and exhibit \>90 degrees active forward elevation and exhibit \>20 degrees of active external rotation.
2-year
Radiographic Failures
Radiographic failure is defined as a shift in the position of the component \>3mm or 3 degrees, a fracture of the cement mantle, a fracture of the component, or a \>2mm radiolucency completely around either prosthesis.
Post-operative, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, 2-year
Safety Assessment
Number of device related adverse events and device failures at the 2 year time frame.
2-year
Study Arms (3)
Primary
EXPERIMENTALPrimary shoulder
Revision
EXPERIMENTALRevision shoulder
Continued Access
EXPERIMENTALPrimary shoulder subjects enrolled at a later date in order to collect more data.
Interventions
For subjects with rotator cuff arthropathy and no previous shoulder device implanted.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Irreparable rotator cuff or failed hemi or total shoulder arthroplasty with irreparable rotator cuff
- Evidence of upward displacement of the humeral head with respect to the glenoid
- Loss of glenohumeral joint space
- Functional deltoid muscle
- Patient is likely to be available for evaluation for the duration of the study
- Visual Analog Pain Scale 5 or greater
You may not qualify if:
- Non functional deltoid muscle
- Active sepsis
- Excessive glenoid bone loss
- Pregnancy
- Neurological abnormalities, which could hinder patient's ability or willingness to follow study procedures. For example, any that may restrict physical activities such as Parkinson's, Multiple Sclerosis, or previous stroke, which affects upper extremity.
- Mental conditions that may interfere with ability to give an informed consent or willingness to fulfill the study requirements (i.e., severe mental retardation such that the patient cannot understand the informed consent process, global dementia, prior strokes that interfere with the patient's cognitive abilities, senile dementia, and Alzheimer's Disease.
- Prisoners
- Conditions that place excessive demand on the implant (i.e. Charcot's joints, muscle deficiencies, refusal to modify postoperative physical activities, skeletal immaturity).
- Known metal allergy (i.e., jewelry).
- Visual Analog Pain Scale \<5.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (25)
Arthritis Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Glendale, California, 91206, United States
Orthopaedic Specialty Institute
Orange, California, 92868, United States
University of Colorado
Denver, Colorado, 80054, United States
Orthopedic Center of the Rockies
Fort Collins, Colorado, 80525, United States
Advanced Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Specialists, P.C.
Lonetree, Colorado, 80124, United States
Steadman Hawkins SPT Medical Foundation
Vail, Colorado, 81657, United States
Atlantis Orthopaedics
Atlantis, Florida, 33462, United States
Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine
Jupiter, Florida, 33458, United States
Palm Beach Orthopaedic Institute
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, 33410, United States
Florida Orthopedic Institute
Temple Terrace, Florida, 33637, United States
Unknown Facility
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342, United States
Cincinnati Sports Medicine & Orthopaedic Center
Crestview, Kentucky, 41017, United States
Unknown Facility
Lutherville, Maryland, 21093, United States
Orthopedic Specialists
Towson, Maryland, 21204, United States
TRIA Orthopaedic Center
Bloomington, Minnesota, 55431, United States
Hospital for Special Surgery
New York, New York, 10021, United States
UNC School of Medicine
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Crystal Clinic
Akron, Ohio, 44333, United States
Bone & Joint Hospital, LLC
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103, United States
Orthopedic Research Foundation of the Carolinas
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29307, United States
The Carrell Clinic
Dallas, Texas, 75231, United States
Orthopedic Associates of Dallas
Dallas, Texas, 75246, United States
Orthopedic Specialty Associates, P.A.
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104, United States
Unlimited Research
San Antonio, Texas, 78217, United States
Orthopedic Institute
Tyler, Texas, 75701, United States
Related Links
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Manager of Clinical Affairs
- Organization
- DJO Surgical
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mark Frankle, M.D.
Florida Orthopedic Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 30, 2008
First Posted
October 2, 2008
Study Start
October 1, 2002
Primary Completion
June 1, 2008
Study Completion
August 1, 2008
Last Updated
April 19, 2011
Results First Posted
April 19, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-03