NCT00760799

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the benefits of anulus fibrosus repair utilizing Xclose™ compared to a discectomy without anulus fibrosus repair.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
750

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2007

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

34 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2007

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 25, 2008

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 26, 2008

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2011

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

May 2, 2012

Status Verified

May 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

4.8 years

First QC Date

September 25, 2008

Last Update Submit

May 1, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

Lumbar Disc Herniation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Re-operations due to re-herniation (repeat discectomy procedure)

    2 wks and at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Patient outcomes (utilizing Oswestry Disability Index, Visual Analog Scale and SF-12 quality of life assessment), Health care utilization, Return to work

    2 weeks and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

Study Arms (2)

1

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Standard discectomy without anular repair

Procedure: Discectomy with anular repair

2

EXPERIMENTAL

Standard Discectomy with anular repair

Procedure: Discectomy with anular repair

Interventions

Comparison of discectomy with and without repair to the anulus fibrosus of the intervertebral disc

Also known as: Repair of the anulus fibrosus following discectomy.
12

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Candidate for a one or two level discectomy
  • Positive imaging evidence of intervertebral disc herniation at location corresponding to patient's radicular signs or symptoms
  • Anular tear or slit incision and additionally deemed to include sufficient tissue for tissue reapproximation
  • Persistent and predominant radicular pain
  • Pre-operative leg pain score \> 4.0 cm on a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
  • Leg pain unresponsive to conservative treatment (physical therapy and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medical therapy) for 6 or more weeks; exception, individuals suffering from acute and uncontrollable severe leg pain
  • Patient is willing and able to comply with study requirements; willing and able to sign a study-specific, informed consent form, complete necessary study paperwork and return for required follow-up visits.

You may not qualify if:

  • Age less than 18 years
  • Prior or planned surgical procedure intended to fuse or stabilize the lumbar spine
  • Previous surgery involving index level
  • Cauda Equina Syndrome
  • Evidence of severe disc degeneration
  • Greater than Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the affected level
  • No apparent anular defect and no indication to open the anulus at time of procedure
  • Active local or systemic infection
  • Active malignancy or other significant medical co-morbidities
  • Current chemical dependency or significant emotional and/or psychosocial disturbance that would impact treatment outcome or study participation
  • Patient or legal guardians who are unwilling or unable to cooperate or give written informed consent
  • Women who are pregnant or with child bearing potential and who are not on a reliable form of birth control
  • Current fracture, tumor and/or deformity (\> 15° of lumbar scoliosis, using Cobb measuring technique) of the spine
  • Documented history of allergy or intolerance to PET
  • Patient is currently enrolled in other research that could confound the results of the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (34)

North Alabama Neurological, P.A.

Huntsville, Alabama, 35801, United States

Location

Texas Back Institute

Phoenix, Arizona, 85015, United States

Location

Desert Institute for Spine Care

Phoenix, Arizona, 85020, United States

Location

University of California San Diego

San Diego, California, 92103, United States

Location

Denver Spine (Porter Hospital)

Greenwood Village, Colorado, 80111, United States

Location

Denver Spine (Presbyterian/St. Luke's Hospital)

Greenwood Village, Colorado, 80111, United States

Location

North Florida Regional Hospital

Gainesville, Florida, 32605, United States

Location

Lyerly Neurosurgical (Baptist Health)

Jacksonville, Florida, 32207, United States

Location

Mayo Clinic

Jacksonville, Florida, 32224, United States

Location

Lyerly Neurosurgical (Centerone)

Jacksonville, Florida, 32256, United States

Location

Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush

Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States

Location

Chicago Institute of Neurosurgery and Neuroresearch

Chicago, Illinois, 60640, United States

Location

Palos Community Hospital

Palos Heights, Illinois, 60463, United States

Location

Indiana Spine Group

Indianapolis, Indiana, 46260, United States

Location

Heartland Spine

Overland Park, Kansas, 66211, United States

Location

New England Baptist

Boston, Massachusetts, 02120, United States

Location

Oakwood Hospital

Dearborn, Michigan, 48124, United States

Location

Henry Ford

Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States

Location

Central Minnesota Neurosciences

Sartell, Minnesota, 56377, United States

Location

University of Nebraska Medical Center

Omaha, Nebraska, 68198-2035, United States

Location

Hudson Valley Neurosurgical Associates

Suffern, New York, 10901, United States

Location

Capital Neurosurgery

Raleigh, North Carolina, 27609, United States

Location

Atlantic Neurosurgical & Spine

Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401-7593, United States

Location

Pennsylvania Spine Institute

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 17109, United States

Location

West Penn Neurosurgery Group

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232, United States

Location

Our Lady of Fatima Hospital

North Providence, Rhode Island, 02904, United States

Location

East Tennessee Brain and Spine

Johnson City, Tennessee, 37604, United States

Location

Texas Back Institute

Plano, Texas, 75093, United States

Location

San Antonio Orthopedic Group

San Antonio, Texas, 75216, United States

Location

South Texas Spine Clinic

San Antonio, Texas, 75258, United States

Location

University of Utah

Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112, United States

Location

University of Wisconsin

Madison, Wisconsin, 53792, United States

Location

Medical College of Wisconsin

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226, United States

Location

Wyoming Spine and Neurosurgery Associates

Cheyenne, Wyoming, 82009, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Bailey A, Araghi A, Blumenthal S, Huffmon GV; Anular Repair Clinical Study Group. Prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study of anular repair in lumbar discectomy: two-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jun 15;38(14):1161-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828b2e2f.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Intervertebral Disc Displacement

Interventions

Diskectomy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal DiseasesBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesHerniaPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Orthopedic ProceduresTherapeuticsDecompression, SurgicalSurgical Procedures, Operative

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2008

First Posted

September 26, 2008

Study Start

March 1, 2007

Primary Completion

December 1, 2011

Study Completion

January 1, 2012

Last Updated

May 2, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-05

Locations