A New Method of Surgically Treating Varicose Veins and Venous Ulcers - a Study to Assess Clinical and Economic Value
A Dual Centre, Randomised Controlled Trial of the Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Endovenous Laser Therapy (EVLT) in the Treatment of Varicose Veins and Venous Ulcers
1 other identifier
interventional
280
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Varicose veins are a common problem, affecting up to a third of the western adult population. Most suffer with aching, discomfort, pruritis, and muscle cramps, whilst complications include oedema, eczema, lipodermatosclerosis, ulceration, phlebitis, and bleeding. This is known to have a significant negative effect on patient's quality of life (QoL). Surgery has been used for many years, but it is known that there is a temporary decline in QoL post-op. This was demonstrated in our pilot study. Surgery leads to painful and prolonged recovery in some patients and has the risks of infection, haematoma and nerve injury. Recurrence rates are known to be significant. Duplex of veins post surgery has demonstrated persistent reflux in 9-29% of cases at 1 year, 13-40% at 2 years, 40% at 5 years and 60% at 34 years. 26% of NHS patients were 'very dissatisfied' with their varicose vein surgery. Newer, less invasive treatments are being developed. It would be advantageous to find a treatment that avoided the morbidity of surgery, one that could be performed as a day-case procedure under a local anaesthetic, a treatment that could offer lower recurrence rates and allow an early return to work. These should be the aims of any new treatment for varicose veins. Endovenous Laser Treatment (EVLT) is performed under a local anaesthetic and uses laser energy delivered into the vein to obliterate it. The vein therefore need not be tied off surgically and stripped out. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical, cost effectiveness and safety of Surgery and EVLT.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2004
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 23, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 25, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2009
CompletedAugust 19, 2022
August 1, 2022
5.4 years
September 23, 2008
August 17, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Generic Quality of life - Short Form-36
1 week, 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Disease Specific quality of life - Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire
1 week, 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years
Generic quality of life - EuroQol
1 week, 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years
Venous Clinical Severity Score
3 months, 1 year, 2 years
Visual analogue pain scores
1 week
Return to work and normal functioning
1 week, 6 weeks
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Surgery
ACTIVE COMPARATOREVLT
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Patients undergo Saphenofemoral ligation, inversion stripping of the Long Saphenous Vein and avulsion of varicosities if necessary under a general anaesthetic.
Patients undergo endovenous laser treatment, using a 810nm laser aiming to occlude the incompetent long saphenous vein from the saphenofemoral junction to the knee. This may then be followed by ambulatory phlebectomy as appropriate. All procedures are to be performed under a local anaesthetic.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Primary, symptomatic, varicose veins.
- Isolated Saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) incompetence leading to long saphenous (LSV) reflux on duplex ultrasound.
- LSV of 4mm diameter at the knee.
- Ability to give informed written consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to give informed written consent.
- Symptomatic or complicated varicose veins not attributable to SFJ/LSV reflux.
- Evidence of deep venous reflux on duplex scan.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trustlead
- University of Hullcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hull Royal Infirmary
Hull, East Yorkshire, HU3 2JZ, United Kingdom
Related Publications (7)
Mekako AI, Hatfield J, Bryce J, Lee D, McCollum PT, Chetter I. A nonrandomised controlled trial of endovenous laser therapy and surgery in the treatment of varicose veins. Ann Vasc Surg. 2006 Jul;20(4):451-7. doi: 10.1007/s10016-006-9095-y. Epub 2006 Jun 27.
PMID: 16802211BACKGROUNDCarradice D, Mekako AI, Mazari FA, Samuel N, Hatfield J, Chetter IC. Clinical and technical outcomes from a randomized clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation compared with conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2011 Aug;98(8):1117-23. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7615. Epub 2011 Jun 3.
PMID: 21638277RESULTCarradice D, Mekako AI, Mazari FA, Samuel N, Hatfield J, Chetter IC. Randomized clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation compared with conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2011 Apr;98(4):501-10. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7394. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
PMID: 21283981RESULTMohamed AH, Howitt A, Rae S, Cai PL, Hitchman L, Wallace T, Nandhra S, Pymer S, Knighton A, Smith G, Chetter IC, Carradice D. Ten-year outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of endothermal ablation versus conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2024 Aug 2;111(8):znae195. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae195.
PMID: 39162334DERIVEDWallace T, El-Sheikha J, Nandhra S, Leung C, Mohamed A, Harwood A, Smith G, Carradice D, Chetter I. Long-term outcomes of endovenous laser ablation and conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2018 Dec;105(13):1759-1767. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10961. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
PMID: 30132797DERIVEDCarradice D, Wallace T, Gohil R, Chetter I. A comparison of the effectiveness of treating those with and without the complications of superficial venous insufficiency. Ann Surg. 2014 Aug;260(2):396-401. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000541.
PMID: 24424141DERIVEDCarradice D, Mazari FA, Mekako A, Hatfield J, Allgar V, Chetter IC. Energy delivery during 810 nm endovenous laser ablation of varicose veins and post-procedural morbidity. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Sep;40(3):393-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.04.010. Epub 2010 May 26.
PMID: 20510634DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ian C Chetter, MBChB
University of Hull
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 23, 2008
First Posted
September 25, 2008
Study Start
March 1, 2004
Primary Completion
August 1, 2009
Study Completion
August 1, 2009
Last Updated
August 19, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08