NCT00758368

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of apomorphine, given by two different methods, to determine how best to manage dyskinesias.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2009

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 23, 2008

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 25, 2008

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2009

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

November 2, 2018

Status Verified

October 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

September 23, 2008

Last Update Submit

October 31, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Parkinson's diseasePDpulsatile apomorphinedyskinesiaapomorphinecontinuous dopaminergic stimulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in dyskinesia severity and duration during the levodopa infusion, measured with a clinical rating scale during two-hour levodopa infusion

    at baseline and after 6 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Improvement in motor performance, measured as change in tapping speed during levodopa infusion

    at baseline and after 6 months

  • Improvement in "on" time, as measured by subject diaries

    at baseline and after 6 months

  • Reduction in levodopa and adjunct drug use

    at baseline and after 6 months

Study Arms (2)

Ambulatory Pump

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will receive apomorphine via a pump. Participants in the Continuous Delivery Arm will self-administer apomorphine continuously (12-14 hours a day) using a portable pump.

Drug: Apomorphine

Subcutaneous Injections

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants will receive apomorphine via an injection pen. Participants in the Intermittent Delivery Arm will self-administer apomorphine at intervals, via a injection, using pen injector.

Drug: Apomorphine

Interventions

Participants in both arms will receive the study drug apomorphine for 6 months. One group will receive it continuously using a portable pump during waking hours, and the other group will receive it intermittently by bolus injections. The continuous delivery group will receive up to 100 mg apomorphine per 24 hours, delivered subcutaneously by ambulatory pump. The intermittent delivery group will receive up to 5 subcutaneous injections totaling up to 20 mg daily.

Also known as: Apokyn, apomorphine, apo-go pump
Ambulatory PumpSubcutaneous Injections

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • idiopathic Parkinson's Disease
  • clear response to levodopa (sinemet)
  • "off" at least 20% of waking day
  • dyskinesias present for at least two hours of waking day
  • subject or caregiver able to master use of drug delivery system (injector pen or pump)

You may not qualify if:

  • physical complications that would preclude safe participation
  • standing systolic BP of \<80
  • lack of tolerance or response to apomorphine
  • drug/alcohol abuse

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Oregon Health and Science University

Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Manson AJ, Turner K, Lees AJ. Apomorphine monotherapy in the treatment of refractory motor complications of Parkinson's disease: long-term follow-up study of 64 patients. Mov Disord. 2002 Nov;17(6):1235-41. doi: 10.1002/mds.10281.

    PMID: 12465062BACKGROUND
  • Stocchi F, Ruggieri S, Vacca L, Olanow CW. Prospective randomized trial of lisuride infusion versus oral levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease. Brain. 2002 Sep;125(Pt 9):2058-66. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf214.

    PMID: 12183351BACKGROUND
  • Stocchi F, Vacca L, Ruggieri S, Olanow CW. Intermittent vs continuous levodopa administration in patients with advanced Parkinson disease: a clinical and pharmacokinetic study. Arch Neurol. 2005 Jun;62(6):905-10. doi: 10.1001/archneur.62.6.905.

    PMID: 15956161BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Parkinson DiseaseDyskinesias

Interventions

Apomorphine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Parkinsonian DisordersBasal Ganglia DiseasesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesMovement DisordersSynucleinopathiesNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AporphinesBenzylisoquinolinesAlkaloidsHeterocyclic CompoundsIsoquinolinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings

Study Officials

  • John G. Nutt, MD

    Oregon Health and Science University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of Neurology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2008

First Posted

September 25, 2008

Study Start

March 1, 2009

Primary Completion

June 1, 2011

Study Completion

June 1, 2011

Last Updated

November 2, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-10

Locations