Study Stopped
Inadequate support to conduct the study
Comparison of Continuous and Pulsatile Apomorphine in Parkinson's Disease
2 other identifiers
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of apomorphine, given by two different methods, to determine how best to manage dyskinesias.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Mar 2009
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 23, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 25, 2008
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2011
CompletedNovember 2, 2018
October 1, 2018
2.3 years
September 23, 2008
October 31, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in dyskinesia severity and duration during the levodopa infusion, measured with a clinical rating scale during two-hour levodopa infusion
at baseline and after 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Improvement in motor performance, measured as change in tapping speed during levodopa infusion
at baseline and after 6 months
Improvement in "on" time, as measured by subject diaries
at baseline and after 6 months
Reduction in levodopa and adjunct drug use
at baseline and after 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Ambulatory Pump
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive apomorphine via a pump. Participants in the Continuous Delivery Arm will self-administer apomorphine continuously (12-14 hours a day) using a portable pump.
Subcutaneous Injections
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will receive apomorphine via an injection pen. Participants in the Intermittent Delivery Arm will self-administer apomorphine at intervals, via a injection, using pen injector.
Interventions
Participants in both arms will receive the study drug apomorphine for 6 months. One group will receive it continuously using a portable pump during waking hours, and the other group will receive it intermittently by bolus injections. The continuous delivery group will receive up to 100 mg apomorphine per 24 hours, delivered subcutaneously by ambulatory pump. The intermittent delivery group will receive up to 5 subcutaneous injections totaling up to 20 mg daily.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- idiopathic Parkinson's Disease
- clear response to levodopa (sinemet)
- "off" at least 20% of waking day
- dyskinesias present for at least two hours of waking day
- subject or caregiver able to master use of drug delivery system (injector pen or pump)
You may not qualify if:
- physical complications that would preclude safe participation
- standing systolic BP of \<80
- lack of tolerance or response to apomorphine
- drug/alcohol abuse
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
Related Publications (3)
Manson AJ, Turner K, Lees AJ. Apomorphine monotherapy in the treatment of refractory motor complications of Parkinson's disease: long-term follow-up study of 64 patients. Mov Disord. 2002 Nov;17(6):1235-41. doi: 10.1002/mds.10281.
PMID: 12465062BACKGROUNDStocchi F, Ruggieri S, Vacca L, Olanow CW. Prospective randomized trial of lisuride infusion versus oral levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease. Brain. 2002 Sep;125(Pt 9):2058-66. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf214.
PMID: 12183351BACKGROUNDStocchi F, Vacca L, Ruggieri S, Olanow CW. Intermittent vs continuous levodopa administration in patients with advanced Parkinson disease: a clinical and pharmacokinetic study. Arch Neurol. 2005 Jun;62(6):905-10. doi: 10.1001/archneur.62.6.905.
PMID: 15956161BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John G. Nutt, MD
Oregon Health and Science University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Neurology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 23, 2008
First Posted
September 25, 2008
Study Start
March 1, 2009
Primary Completion
June 1, 2011
Study Completion
June 1, 2011
Last Updated
November 2, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-10