Per-cutaneous Intervention Based Paclitaxel and Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Bare Stents for the Treatment of de Novo Coronary Lesions (PAINT)
PercutAneous INTervention With Biodegradable- Polymer Based Paclitaxel-eluting, Sirolimus-eluting, or Bare Stents for the Treatment of de Novo Coronary Lesions.
1 other identifier
interventional
280
1 country
11
Brief Summary
Objectives: PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To compare the in-stent late loss at 9 months of paclitaxel- and sirolimus- eluting stents with the late loss of bare metal control stents. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: Safety: To compare the occurrence of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) at 30 days, 9 months, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years among the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms. To compare the occurrence de Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) within 5 years among the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms. To compare the occurrence of in-stent thrombosis within 5 years among the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms. Efficacy: To compare the rate of angiographic success among the study groups To compare the rate of procedural success among the study groups To compare the incidence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 9 months, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years among the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms. To compare the incidence of clinically driven target vessel revascularization at 9 months, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years among the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms. To compare the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year cost-effectiveness profile of the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms. To compare the 9-month in-stent late loss of paclitaxel-eluting stents to the in-stent late loss of sirolimus-eluting stents To compare the 9-month in-segment late loss among the study groups To compare the 9-month in-stent and in-segment binary restenosis rate among the study groups To compare the IVUS percent neointimal obstruction among the study groups Study Design: In the present RANDOMIZED study, the paclitaxel-eluting stent Infinnium® and the sirolimus-eluting stent Supralimus® will be compared to a metallic stent with the same structure (Milennium Matrix®) but without drug elution for the treatment of de novo lesions in native coronaries. The study will be a multicenter clinical trial and will include patients for the treatment with one of the three study stents. In total, 275 patients will be enrolled, randomly allocated for the Infinnium®, Supralimus®, or Milennium Matrix® stents in a 2:2:1 proportion. Patients will be followed-up for 12 months after the index procedure. All patients will undergo a follow-up angiography at 9 months. A subgroup of 55 patients will be evaluated at 9 months with IVUS examination. Treatment: Patients will be treated, according to the randomization groups, with Infinnium®, Supralimus®, or Milennium Matrix® stents of 19 mm, 23 mm, or 29 mm and nominal diameters of 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 mm.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
11 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 11, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 15, 2008
CompletedNovember 20, 2015
November 1, 2015
2.2 years
September 11, 2008
November 19, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
compare the in-stent late loss at 9M of paclitaxel- and sirolimus- eluting stents with the late loss of bare metal control stents.
9 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
MACE at 1,9&12M, SAE & ST until 12M. Rate of angiographic & procedural success, TLR & TVR at 1&9M Instent LL between Supralimus®, Infinnium® & Matrix® Insegment binary restenosis at 9M IVUS% neointimal obstruction cost-effectiveness profile at 12M
1 Year
Study Arms (3)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORPercutaneous coronary intervention with bare metal stent
2
EXPERIMENTALPercutaneous coronary intervention with paclitaxel-eluting stent
3
EXPERIMENTALPercutaneous coronary intervention with sirolimus-eluting stent
Interventions
Percutaneous coronary intervention with bare metal stent
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years;
- Symptomatic ischemic heart disease and/or objective evidence of myocardial ischemia;
- De novo coronary lesion (non-restenosis);
- Target lesion located in a native artery;
- Target lesion located in a vessel with diameter between 2.5-3.5 mm (visual analysis);
- Target lesion amenable to treatment with a single stent of up to 29 mm in length;
- Target lesion with a diameter stenosis \> 50% (visual analysis);
- Acceptable candidate for surgical revascularization;
- Signed informed consent term.
You may not qualify if:
- Q-wave myocardial infarction \< 48 hours before the index procedure
- Recent myocardial infarction, with or without Q waves, with cardiac markers levels still above the normal upper limits
- Left ventricle ejection fraction ≤30%
- Renal dysfunction (serum creatinine \> 2.0 mg/dl \[\>177 µmol/l\])
- Platelet count \< 100,000 cells/mm3 or \> 700,000 cells/mm3
- White cell count \< 3.000 cells/mm3
- Suspected or known liver disease (including subclinical hepatitis)
- Heart transplant recipient
- Know allergy to aspirin, clopidogrel, ticlopidine, paclitaxel, sirolimus, heparin, or stainless steel
- Life expectancy \< 12 months
- Any medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the ideal participation in study
- Coronary angioplasty (with or without stent) \< 6 months in any segment of the target vessel
- Previous coronary angioplasty (with or without stent), at any time, in a coronary segment \< 5 mm (proximal or distal) from the target lesion
- Coronary angioplasty (with or without stent) in any segment of the target vessel planned during the next 12 months following the index procedure.
- Restenotic target lesion
- +11 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sahajanand Medical Technologies Limitedlead
- CMS Medicalcollaborator
Study Sites (11)
Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio
Fortaleza, Ceará, 60430-370, Brazil
Hospital Universitário Cassiano Antonio de Moraes
Vitória, Espírito Santo, 29042-755, Brazil
Hospital Meridional Intercath
Vitória, Espírito Santo, 29156-580, Brazil
Hospital Biocor
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 34000-000, Brazil
Rede D'Or de Hospitais
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 20941-150, Brazil
Hospital Natal Center
Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, 59054-630, Brazil
Hospital São Lucas da PUCRS
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90610-000, Brazil
Hospital São Paulo - UNIFESP
São Paulo, São Paulo, 04024-002, Brazil
Hospital São Camilo
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05022-001, Brazil
Hospital Santa Marcelina
São Paulo, São Paulo, 08270-070, Brazil
Instituto do Coração - InCor
São Paulo, 05403-900, Brazil
Related Publications (4)
Lemos PA, Moulin B, Perin MA, Oliveira LA, Arruda JA, Lima VC, Lima AA, Caramori PR, Medeiros CR, Barbosa MR, Brito FS Jr, Ribeiro EE, Martinez EE; PAINT study. Rationale and design for the PAINT randomized trial. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2009 Dec;93(6):547-53, 590-7. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2009001200006. English, Portuguese.
PMID: 20379631RESULTLemos PA, Moulin B, Perin MA, Oliveira LA, Arruda JA, Lima VC, Lima AA, Caramori PR, Medeiros CR, Barbosa MR, Brito FS Jr, Ribeiro EE, Martinez EE; PAINT trial investigators. Randomized evaluation of two drug-eluting stents with identical metallic platform and biodegradable polymer but different agents (paclitaxel or sirolimus) compared against bare stents: 1-year results of the PAINT trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Nov 1;74(5):665-73. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22166.
PMID: 19670303RESULTLemos PA, Moulin B, Perin MA, Oliveira LA, Arruda JA, Lima VC, Lima AA, Caramori PR, Medeiros CR, Barbosa MR, Brito FS Jr, Ribeiro EE. Late clinical outcomes after implantation of drug-eluting stents coated with biodegradable polymers: 3-year follow-up of the PAINT randomised trial. EuroIntervention. 2012 May 15;8(1):117-9. doi: 10.4244/EIJV8I1A18.
PMID: 22580255RESULTMarchini JF, Gomes WF, Moulin B, Perin MA, Oliveira LA, Arruda JA, Lima VC, Lima AA, Caramori PR, Medeiros CR, Barbosa MR, Brito FS Jr, Ribeiro EE, Lemos PA. Very late outcomes of drug-eluting stents coated with biodegradable polymers: insights from the 5-year follow-up of the randomized PAINT trial. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2014 Dec;4(6):480-6. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2014.12.05.
PMID: 25610805RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Prof. Pedro A. Lemos, MD
Instituto do Coração - InCor
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 11, 2008
First Posted
September 15, 2008
Study Start
March 1, 2006
Primary Completion
May 1, 2008
Last Updated
November 20, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-11