NCT00752362

Brief Summary

Objectives: PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To compare the in-stent late loss at 9 months of paclitaxel- and sirolimus- eluting stents with the late loss of bare metal control stents. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: Safety: To compare the occurrence of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) at 30 days, 9 months, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years among the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms. To compare the occurrence de Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) within 5 years among the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms. To compare the occurrence of in-stent thrombosis within 5 years among the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms. Efficacy: To compare the rate of angiographic success among the study groups To compare the rate of procedural success among the study groups To compare the incidence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 9 months, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years among the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms. To compare the incidence of clinically driven target vessel revascularization at 9 months, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years among the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms. To compare the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year cost-effectiveness profile of the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms. To compare the 9-month in-stent late loss of paclitaxel-eluting stents to the in-stent late loss of sirolimus-eluting stents To compare the 9-month in-segment late loss among the study groups To compare the 9-month in-stent and in-segment binary restenosis rate among the study groups To compare the IVUS percent neointimal obstruction among the study groups Study Design: In the present RANDOMIZED study, the paclitaxel-eluting stent Infinnium® and the sirolimus-eluting stent Supralimus® will be compared to a metallic stent with the same structure (Milennium Matrix®) but without drug elution for the treatment of de novo lesions in native coronaries. The study will be a multicenter clinical trial and will include patients for the treatment with one of the three study stents. In total, 275 patients will be enrolled, randomly allocated for the Infinnium®, Supralimus®, or Milennium Matrix® stents in a 2:2:1 proportion. Patients will be followed-up for 12 months after the index procedure. All patients will undergo a follow-up angiography at 9 months. A subgroup of 55 patients will be evaluated at 9 months with IVUS examination. Treatment: Patients will be treated, according to the randomization groups, with Infinnium®, Supralimus®, or Milennium Matrix® stents of 19 mm, 23 mm, or 29 mm and nominal diameters of 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 mm.

Trial Health

80
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
280

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

11 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2006

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2008

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 11, 2008

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 15, 2008

Completed
Last Updated

November 20, 2015

Status Verified

November 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

September 11, 2008

Last Update Submit

November 19, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

Supralimus®,Infinnium®,Matrix®,RestenosisPercutaneousRevascularizationTechniquesMetallicPlatformAgentsAntiproliferativeProperties

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • compare the in-stent late loss at 9M of paclitaxel- and sirolimus- eluting stents with the late loss of bare metal control stents.

    9 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • MACE at 1,9&12M, SAE & ST until 12M. Rate of angiographic & procedural success, TLR & TVR at 1&9M Instent LL between Supralimus®, Infinnium® & Matrix® Insegment binary restenosis at 9M IVUS% neointimal obstruction cost-effectiveness profile at 12M

    1 Year

Study Arms (3)

1

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Percutaneous coronary intervention with bare metal stent

Device: Milennium Matrix® (Control)

2

EXPERIMENTAL

Percutaneous coronary intervention with paclitaxel-eluting stent

Device: Infinnium®

3

EXPERIMENTAL

Percutaneous coronary intervention with sirolimus-eluting stent

Device: Supralimus®

Interventions

Percutaneous coronary intervention with bare metal stent

Also known as: Milennium Matrix®
1

Percutaneous coronary intervention with paclitaxel-eluting stent

2

Percutaneous coronary intervention with sirolimus-eluting stent

3

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 18 years;
  • Symptomatic ischemic heart disease and/or objective evidence of myocardial ischemia;
  • De novo coronary lesion (non-restenosis);
  • Target lesion located in a native artery;
  • Target lesion located in a vessel with diameter between 2.5-3.5 mm (visual analysis);
  • Target lesion amenable to treatment with a single stent of up to 29 mm in length;
  • Target lesion with a diameter stenosis \> 50% (visual analysis);
  • Acceptable candidate for surgical revascularization;
  • Signed informed consent term.

You may not qualify if:

  • Q-wave myocardial infarction \< 48 hours before the index procedure
  • Recent myocardial infarction, with or without Q waves, with cardiac markers levels still above the normal upper limits
  • Left ventricle ejection fraction ≤30%
  • Renal dysfunction (serum creatinine \> 2.0 mg/dl \[\>177 µmol/l\])
  • Platelet count \< 100,000 cells/mm3 or \> 700,000 cells/mm3
  • White cell count \< 3.000 cells/mm3
  • Suspected or known liver disease (including subclinical hepatitis)
  • Heart transplant recipient
  • Know allergy to aspirin, clopidogrel, ticlopidine, paclitaxel, sirolimus, heparin, or stainless steel
  • Life expectancy \< 12 months
  • Any medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the ideal participation in study
  • Coronary angioplasty (with or without stent) \< 6 months in any segment of the target vessel
  • Previous coronary angioplasty (with or without stent), at any time, in a coronary segment \< 5 mm (proximal or distal) from the target lesion
  • Coronary angioplasty (with or without stent) in any segment of the target vessel planned during the next 12 months following the index procedure.
  • Restenotic target lesion
  • +11 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (11)

Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio

Fortaleza, Ceará, 60430-370, Brazil

Location

Hospital Universitário Cassiano Antonio de Moraes

Vitória, Espírito Santo, 29042-755, Brazil

Location

Hospital Meridional Intercath

Vitória, Espírito Santo, 29156-580, Brazil

Location

Hospital Biocor

Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 34000-000, Brazil

Location

Rede D'Or de Hospitais

Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 20941-150, Brazil

Location

Hospital Natal Center

Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, 59054-630, Brazil

Location

Hospital São Lucas da PUCRS

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90610-000, Brazil

Location

Hospital São Paulo - UNIFESP

São Paulo, São Paulo, 04024-002, Brazil

Location

Hospital São Camilo

São Paulo, São Paulo, 05022-001, Brazil

Location

Hospital Santa Marcelina

São Paulo, São Paulo, 08270-070, Brazil

Location

Instituto do Coração - InCor

São Paulo, 05403-900, Brazil

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Lemos PA, Moulin B, Perin MA, Oliveira LA, Arruda JA, Lima VC, Lima AA, Caramori PR, Medeiros CR, Barbosa MR, Brito FS Jr, Ribeiro EE, Martinez EE; PAINT study. Rationale and design for the PAINT randomized trial. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2009 Dec;93(6):547-53, 590-7. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2009001200006. English, Portuguese.

  • Lemos PA, Moulin B, Perin MA, Oliveira LA, Arruda JA, Lima VC, Lima AA, Caramori PR, Medeiros CR, Barbosa MR, Brito FS Jr, Ribeiro EE, Martinez EE; PAINT trial investigators. Randomized evaluation of two drug-eluting stents with identical metallic platform and biodegradable polymer but different agents (paclitaxel or sirolimus) compared against bare stents: 1-year results of the PAINT trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Nov 1;74(5):665-73. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22166.

  • Lemos PA, Moulin B, Perin MA, Oliveira LA, Arruda JA, Lima VC, Lima AA, Caramori PR, Medeiros CR, Barbosa MR, Brito FS Jr, Ribeiro EE. Late clinical outcomes after implantation of drug-eluting stents coated with biodegradable polymers: 3-year follow-up of the PAINT randomised trial. EuroIntervention. 2012 May 15;8(1):117-9. doi: 10.4244/EIJV8I1A18.

  • Marchini JF, Gomes WF, Moulin B, Perin MA, Oliveira LA, Arruda JA, Lima VC, Lima AA, Caramori PR, Medeiros CR, Barbosa MR, Brito FS Jr, Ribeiro EE, Lemos PA. Very late outcomes of drug-eluting stents coated with biodegradable polymers: insights from the 5-year follow-up of the randomized PAINT trial. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2014 Dec;4(6):480-6. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2014.12.05.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Restenosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary StenosisCoronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Prof. Pedro A. Lemos, MD

    Instituto do Coração - InCor

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2008

First Posted

September 15, 2008

Study Start

March 1, 2006

Primary Completion

May 1, 2008

Last Updated

November 20, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-11

Locations