A Comparison of Two Different Surgical Techniques for Total Hip Resurfacing
1 other identifier
interventional
49
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study compares the posterior approach to the anterolateral approach using the ReCap® Total Hip Resurfacing System.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2008
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 10, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 11, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2017
CompletedJanuary 11, 2018
September 1, 2016
4.8 years
September 10, 2008
January 9, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
RSA
1 week, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Harris Hip Score
Pre-operatively, 1 week, 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year
Microdialysis
1 week
Conventional X-ray
1 week
Gait Analysis
1 week, 3 months, 1 year
DEXA scan
Pre-operatively, 1 week, 1 year, 2 years
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTALThis arm utilizes the anterolateral approach using the ReCap® Total Hip Resurfacing System.
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis arm utilizes the posterior approach using the ReCap® Total Hip Resurfacing System.
Interventions
The anterolateral approach is performed with the patient positioned on the side. The blood supply to the femoral neck from the medial circumflex artery is regarded preserved by this surgical method.
The posterior approach is performed with the patient positioned on the side. The medial circumflex artery is cut at the lower border of the short external rotators risking a compromised blood supply to the femoral head.
This arm utilizes the anterolateral approach using the ReCap® Total Hip Resurfacing System.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Primary hip OA
- Secondary hip OA due to mild and moderate acetabular dysplasia
- Sufficient bone quality for cementless acetabular component
- Suited for resurfacing of the femoral head (pre- and intraoperatively assessed)
- \>29 years
- \<61 years
You may not qualify if:
- Neuromuscular or vascular diseases in affected leg
- Patients found intra-operatively to be unsuited for a cementless acetabular component or cementing of the femoral component
- Need of NSAID post-operatively
- Fracture sequelae
- Females at risk of pregnancy (no safe contraceptives)
- Severe hip dysplasia
- Sequelae from hip disease in childhood
- Medicine with large effect on bone density (K-vitamin antagonists, loop-diuretic)
- Alcoholism (females \> 14 units per week, males \> 21 units per week) AVN
- Osteoporosis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Zimmer Biometlead
- Aarhus University Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, Denmark
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thomas Pryno, MD
Aarhus University Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kjeld Soeballe, MD, PhD
Aarhus University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 10, 2008
First Posted
September 11, 2008
Study Start
September 1, 2008
Primary Completion
July 1, 2013
Study Completion
February 1, 2017
Last Updated
January 11, 2018
Record last verified: 2016-09