A Study Evaluating a Urinary Catheter With Different Activation Times for the Wetting Solution, in Healthy Male Volunteers.
A Randomized, Single-blind, Cross-over, Single-centre Study in Healthy Volunteers Evaluating Subject Perception and Friction at Withdrawal of Catheters With Different Activation Times Compared to a Reference Catheter
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary purpose of this study is to compare the subject's perception (separately for each randomized catheter) of practicing catheterization when using catheters with sodium chloride in wetting solution (using two different activation times) with a standard reference catheter. The hypothesis is that the subjects' perception of catheterization is the same or more positive when using the test catheters compared to the reference catheter.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2008
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 5, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 8, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 6, 2021
CompletedMay 6, 2021
April 1, 2021
Same day
September 5, 2008
February 4, 2021
April 9, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Subjects' Perception at Insertion of Test Catheter Activated for 5 Seconds, Compared to Reference.
The assessment was made in relation to the reference catheter, and the question to the subject was 'How do you experience this procedure/catheterization in comparison with the baseline procedure/catheterization regarding insertion?'.
A minimum of two hours elapsed between the catheterizations and each catherization lasted for 3 minutes. The subjects were catheterized three times during one day.
Subjects' Perception at Insertion of Test Catheter Activated for 24 Hours, Compared to Reference.
The assessment was made in relation to the reference catheter, and the question to the subject was 'How do you experience this procedure/catheterization in comparison with the baseline procedure/catheterization regarding insertion?'.
A minimum of two hours elapsed between the catheterizations and each catherization lasted for 3 minutes. The subjects were catheterized three times during one day.
Subjects' Perception at Withdrawal of Test Catheter Activated for 5 Seconds, Compared to Reference.
The assessment was made in relation to the reference catheter, and the question to the subject was 'How do you experience this procedure/catheterization in comparison with the baseline procedure/catheterization regarding withdrawal?'.
A minimum of two hours elapsed between the catheterizations and each catherization lasted for 3 minutes. The subjects were catheterized three times during one day.
Subjects' Perception at Withdrawal of Test Catheter Activated for 24 Hours, Compared to Reference.
The assessment was made in relation to the reference catheter, and the question to the subject was 'How do you experience this procedure/catheterization in comparison with the baseline procedure/catheterization regarding withdrawal?'.
A minimum of two hours elapsed between the catheterizations and each catherization lasted for 3 minutes. The subjects were catheterized three times during one day.
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Comparison of the Perception at Insertion Between 5s and 24h Activation Times. Times
A minimum of two hours elapsed between the catheterizations and each catherization lasted for 3 minutes. The subjects were catheterized three times during one day.
Comparison of the Perception at Withdrawal Between 5s and 24h Activation Times.
A minimum of two hours elapsed between the catheterizations and each catherization lasted for 3 minutes. The subjects were catheterized three times during one day.
Test of Carry-over Effect at Insertion, Mean Rating of Perception on a Scale of 0 to 5
A minimum of two hours elapsed between the catheterizations and each catherization lasted for 3 minutes. The subjects were catheterized three times during one day.
Test of Carry-over Effect at Withdrawal, Mean Rating of Perception on a Scale of 0 to 5
A minimum of two hours elapsed between the catheterizations and each catherization lasted for 3 minutes. The subjects were catheterized three times during one day.
Tension Test System: Ref-24h Mean
The Tension test system was performed while withdrawing the catheters up to 5 seconds.
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
LoFric POBE Hydro-Kit II, 5 seconds and then LoFric POBE Hydro-Kit II, 24 hours
EXPERIMENTALAll subjects were first catheterizised with the reference catheter. After randomisation this group was first catheterizised with LoFric POBE Hydro-Kit II, activation time 5 seconds. Then the next test catheter was used LoFric POBE Hydro-Kit II, activation time 24 hours.
LoFric POBE Hydro-Kit II, 24 hours and then LoFric POBE Hydro-Kit II, 5 seconds
EXPERIMENTALAll subjects were first catheterizised with the reference catheter. After randomisation this group was first catheterizised with LoFric POBE Hydro-Kit II, activation time 24 hours. Then the next test catheter was used LoFric POBE Hydro-Kit II, activation time 5 seconds.
Interventions
The subjects were first catheterized with this reference catheter.
An unsalted LoFric POBE Hydro-Kit II, Nelaton 40 cm, CH 12 with sodium chloride in wetting solution, activation time 5 seconds
An unsalted LoFric POBE Hydro-Kit II, Nelaton 40 cm, CH 12 with sodium chloride in wetting solution, activation time 24 hours
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Provision of written informed consent
- Healthy volunteer
- Male aged 18 years or over
You may not qualify if:
- Known or suspected, current impairment of and/or decreased urethral sensibility
- History of urethral morbidity
- History of urinary tract infection within three months, or ongoing symptomatic urinary tract infection
- Use of medications that may affect the urethra´s dryness (anti-cholinergic drugs or cortisone)
- Current drug, alcohol or other substance abuse
- Other significant disease or condition (e.g. benign prostate hypertrophy, other prostatic lesions), which may interfere with treatment and/or evaluation
- Allergy to antibiotics suspected poor compliance with the protocol during the complete study period
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Karolinska Trial Alliance A2:01, Karolinska University Hospital
Stockholm, SE-171 76, Sweden
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Head of Medical Affairs
- Organization
- Wellspect Health Care
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Magnus Jacobsson, MD, PhD, Prof.
Dentsply Sirona Implants and Consumables
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 5, 2008
First Posted
September 8, 2008
Study Start
August 1, 2008
Primary Completion
August 1, 2008
Study Completion
August 1, 2008
Last Updated
May 6, 2021
Results First Posted
May 6, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04