Peri-Operative Management of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the Effects of Epidural, Spinal and PCA in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colectomy.
1 other identifier
interventional
99
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim is to ascertain which method out of epidural, spinal or patient controlled analgesia (PCA) is the most appropriate in fluid optimised patients after laparoscopic colorectal surgery in terms of pain control, length of hospital stay and time for gut recovery. The second aim is to assess the physiological changes that occur when the patient is placed in steep trendelenberg position together with the creation of the pneumoperitoneum.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Dec 2007
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 4, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 5, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2009
CompletedSeptember 5, 2008
September 1, 2008
1.8 years
September 4, 2008
September 4, 2008
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Length of hospital stay
Once the patient is safe to go home
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Pain, time till flatus, time till bowels open, incidence of nausea and vomiting, quality of life
Once secondary outcomes are successful, patient can go home
Study Arms (3)
Epidural
ACTIVE COMPARATOREpidural
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORSpinal
3
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this limb receive a PCA
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with colorectal disease that requires a bowel resection who agree to have laparoscopic surgery with placement of an oesophageal doppler and a central line and who agree to be randomised with regards to a post operative analgesic regime.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients will be excluded from the post operative analgesia trial if they have abnormal clotting, skin infection over or near the back, presence of neurological disorders or anatomical abnormalities of the vertebral column, or for a reason identified by the anaesthetist.
- Patients will also be excluded if there is a contra-indication to oesophageal doppler such as oesophageal disease, recent oesophageal or upper airway surgery, moderate to severe aortic valve disease and bleeding diathesis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
MATTU
Guildford, Surrey, GU2 9PS, United Kingdom
Related Publications (4)
Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Mekhail N, Dugan A, Fazio VW. Randomized clinical trial comparing epidural anaesthesia and patient-controlled analgesia after laparoscopic segmental colectomy. Br J Surg. 2003 Oct;90(10):1195-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4223.
PMID: 14515286BACKGROUNDSenagore AJ, Whalley D, Delaney CP, Mekhail N, Duepree HJ, Fazio VW. Epidural anesthesia-analgesia shortens length of stay after laparoscopic segmental colectomy for benign pathology. Surgery. 2001 Jun;129(6):672-6. doi: 10.1067/msy.2001.114648.
PMID: 11391364BACKGROUNDTaqi A, Hong X, Mistraletti G, Stein B, Charlebois P, Carli F. Thoracic epidural analgesia facilitates the restoration of bowel function and dietary intake in patients undergoing laparoscopic colon resection using a traditional, nonaccelerated, perioperative care program. Surg Endosc. 2007 Feb;21(2):247-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-0069-5. Epub 2006 Dec 9.
PMID: 17160649BACKGROUNDKong SK, Onsiong SM, Chiu WK, Li MK. Use of intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain relief after elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Anaesthesia. 2002 Dec;57(12):1168-73. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.02873.x.
PMID: 12437707BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Tim Rockall, FRCS
Minimal Access Therapy Training Unit
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 4, 2008
First Posted
September 5, 2008
Study Start
December 1, 2007
Primary Completion
October 1, 2009
Study Completion
October 1, 2009
Last Updated
September 5, 2008
Record last verified: 2008-09