NCT00741351

Brief Summary

This protocol, NeuroMorfeo, aims to assess equivalence between volatile and intravenous anesthetics for neurosurgical procedures.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
411

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2007

Geographic Reach
1 country

15 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2007

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 22, 2008

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 26, 2008

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2009

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2009

Completed
Last Updated

September 8, 2011

Status Verified

September 1, 2011

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

August 22, 2008

Last Update Submit

September 7, 2011

Conditions

Keywords

AnesthesiaCraniotomyNeurosurgery

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Post-anesthesia awaking time, assessed as the interval (min:sec)required to reach an ALDRETE score ≥ 9

    From estubation to aldrete score ≥ 9

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Neurovegetative stress

    From induction of anesthesia to 24 hours after surgery

  • Intraoperative and post-operative adverse events assessment

    From induction of anesthesia to 24 hours after surgery

  • Brain relaxation evaluated by a blinded neurosurgeon

    From induction of anesthesia to 24 hours after surgery

  • Patient's satisfaction

    From induction of anesthesia to 24 hours after surgery

  • Costs of the three strategies

    From induction of anesthesia to end of surgery

Study Arms (3)

IF

EXPERIMENTAL

Sevoflurane (Inhalation)+Fentanyl

Drug: Sevoflurane + Fentanyl

IR

EXPERIMENTAL

Sevoflurane (Inhalation)+Remifentanyl

Drug: Sevoflurane + Remifentanyl

ER

EXPERIMENTAL

Propofol (Endovenous)+ Remifentanyl

Drug: Propofol + Remifentanyl

Interventions

Sevoflurane is maintained in a MAC range (0.75% to 1.25%) and fentanyl (2-3 microg/kg/hr or 0.7 microg/kg boluses). Just before incision of the scalp, fentanyl (1-2microg/kg/hr) can be supplemented, if necessary

IF

Sevoflurane is maintained in a MAC range (0.75% to 1.25%) and remifentanil (0.5-0.25 microg/kg/min reduced to 0.05-0.1 microg/kg/min after dural opening). Just before incision of the scalp, remifentanil can be supplemented, if necessary

IR

Propofol is maintained with continuous infusion at 10 mg/kg/h for the first 10 minutes, then reduced to 8 mg/kg/h for the following 10 minutes and reduced to 6mg/kg/h thereafter and remifentanil 0.5-0.25 microg/kg/min reduced to 0.05-0.1 microg/kg/min after dural opening. Just before incision of the scalp, remifentanil could be supplemented, if necessary

ER

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient scheduled for elective intracranial surgery under general anesthesia for a supratentorial mass lesion in the next 24 hours;
  • Physical state, evaluated with the ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists ) classification I (normal healthy patient), II (patient with mild systemic disease), or III (patient with severe systemic disease);
  • Age 18-75 years;
  • Normal preoperative level of consciousness, i.e. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) = 15;
  • No signs of intracranial hypertension.

You may not qualify if:

  • Severe cardiovascular pathology, as uncontrolled arterial hypertension, documented reduced coronary reserve.
  • Renal or liver disease precluding the use of either anesthetic technique.
  • Pregnancy .
  • Known allergies to any anesthetic agent.
  • Reduced preoperative level of consciousness, i.e.
  • Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) \< 15.
  • Body weight greater than 120 kg.
  • History of drug abuse or psychiatric conditions.
  • Documented disturbance of the hypothalamic region.Refusal to sign consent form.
  • Participation in other clinical trials.
  • Delayed awakening, because, due to the location or size of the lesion, postoperative sedation and mechanical ventilation are planned.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (15)

Policlinico Consorziale di Bari

Bari, Italy

Location

Ospedale Bellaria Bologna

Bologna, 40100, Italy

Location

IRCCS Fondazione San Raffaele Milano

Milan, 20100, Italy

Location

Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri - Dipartimento di Ricerca Cardiovascolare-

Milan, 20100, Italy

Location

Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo

Monza, 20052, Italy

Location

Ospedale Maggiore della CaritĂ  di Novara

Novara, 28100, Italy

Location

Ospedale di Padova

Padua, 35128, Italy

Location

Azienda Ospedaliera di Parma

Parma, 43100, Italy

Location

Policlinico "A. Gemelli" Roma

Rome, Italy

Location

Policlinico "Umberto I" Roma

Rome, Italy

Location

Azienda Universitaria Senese

Siena, 53100, Italy

Location

Ospedale San Giovanni Bosco Torino

Turin, 10057, Italy

Location

Ospedale San giovanni Battista Torino

Turin, Italy

Location

Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi Varese

Varese, 21100, Italy

Location

Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Verona

Verona, 37121, Italy

Location

Related Publications (26)

  • Hans P, Bonhomme V. Why we still use intravenous drugs as the basic regimen for neurosurgical anaesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006 Oct;19(5):498-503. doi: 10.1097/01.aco.0000245274.69292.ad.

    PMID: 16960481BACKGROUND
  • Todd MM, Warner DS, Sokoll MD, Maktabi MA, Hindman BJ, Scamman FL, Kirschner J. A prospective, comparative trial of three anesthetics for elective supratentorial craniotomy. Propofol/fentanyl, isoflurane/nitrous oxide, and fentanyl/nitrous oxide. Anesthesiology. 1993 Jun;78(6):1005-20. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199306000-00002.

    PMID: 8512094BACKGROUND
  • Engelhard K, Werner C. Inhalational or intravenous anesthetics for craniotomies? Pro inhalational. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006 Oct;19(5):504-8. doi: 10.1097/01.aco.0000245275.76916.87.

    PMID: 16960482BACKGROUND
  • Magni G, Baisi F, La Rosa I, Imperiale C, Fabbrini V, Pennacchiotti ML, Rosa G. No difference in emergence time and early cognitive function between sevoflurane-fentanyl and propofol-remifentanil in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial intracranial surgery. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2005 Jul;17(3):134-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ana.0000167447.33969.16.

    PMID: 16037733BACKGROUND
  • Talke P, Caldwell JE, Brown R, Dodson B, Howley J, Richardson CA. A comparison of three anesthetic techniques in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial intracranial surgery. Anesth Analg. 2002 Aug;95(2):430-5, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200208000-00036.

    PMID: 12145066BACKGROUND
  • Gomberg-Maitland M, Frison L, Halperin JL. Active-control clinical trials to establish equivalence or noninferiority: methodological and statistical concepts linked to quality. Am Heart J. 2003 Sep;146(3):398-403. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00324-7.

    PMID: 12947355BACKGROUND
  • Aldrete JA. The post-anesthesia recovery score revisited. J Clin Anesth. 1995 Feb;7(1):89-91. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(94)00001-k. No abstract available.

    PMID: 7772368BACKGROUND
  • Balakrishnan G, Raudzens P, Samra SK, Song K, Boening JA, Bosek V, Jamerson BD, Warner DS. A comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in patients undergoing surgery for intracranial mass lesions. Anesth Analg. 2000 Jul;91(1):163-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200007000-00030.

    PMID: 10866905BACKGROUND
  • Del Gaudio A, Ciritella P, Perrotta F, Puopolo M, Lauta E, Mastronardi P, De Vivo P. Remifentanil vs fentanyl with a target controlled propofol infusion in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial lesions. Minerva Anestesiol. 2006 May;72(5):309-19. English, Italian.

    PMID: 16675939BACKGROUND
  • Klingstedt C, Giesecke K, Hamberger B, Jarnberg PO. High- and low-dose fentanyl anaesthesia: circulatory and plasma catecholamine responses during cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth. 1987 Feb;59(2):184-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/59.2.184.

    PMID: 3828169BACKGROUND
  • Nishiyama T, Yamashita K, Yokoyama T. Stress hormone changes in general anesthesia of long duration: isoflurane-nitrous oxide vs sevoflurane-nitrous oxide anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 2005 Dec;17(8):586-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.03.009.

    PMID: 16427527BACKGROUND
  • Desborough JP. The stress response to trauma and surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jul;85(1):109-17. doi: 10.1093/bja/85.1.109. No abstract available.

    PMID: 10927999BACKGROUND
  • Bent JM, Paterson JL, Mashiter K, Hall GM. Effects of high-dose fentanyl anaesthesia on the established metabolic and endocrine response to surgery. Anaesthesia. 1984 Jan;39(1):19-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1984.tb09447.x.

    PMID: 6696213BACKGROUND
  • Heesen M, Deinsberger W, Dietrich GV, Detsch O, Boldt J, Hempelmann G. Increase of interleukin-6 plasma levels after elective craniotomy: influence of interleukin-10 and catecholamines. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1996;138(1):77-80. doi: 10.1007/BF01411728.

    PMID: 8686529BACKGROUND
  • Ledowski T, Bein B, Hanss R, Paris A, Fudickar W, Scholz J, Tonner PH. Neuroendocrine stress response and heart rate variability: a comparison of total intravenous versus balanced anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2005 Dec;101(6):1700-1705. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000184041.32175.14.

    PMID: 16301244BACKGROUND
  • Guzzetti S, Borroni E, Garbelli PE, Ceriani E, Della Bella P, Montano N, Cogliati C, Somers VK, Malliani A, Porta A. Symbolic dynamics of heart rate variability: a probe to investigate cardiac autonomic modulation. Circulation. 2005 Jul 26;112(4):465-70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.518449. Epub 2005 Jul 18.

    PMID: 16027252BACKGROUND
  • Olsen KS, Pedersen CB, Madsen JB, Ravn LI, Schifter S. Vasoactive modulators during and after craniotomy: relation to postoperative hypertension. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2002 Jul;14(3):171-9. doi: 10.1097/00008506-200207000-00001.

    PMID: 12172288BACKGROUND
  • Leslie K, Troedel S. Does anaesthesia care affect the outcome following craniotomy? J Clin Neurosci. 2002 May;9(3):231-6. doi: 10.1054/jocn.2001.0934. No abstract available.

    PMID: 12093125BACKGROUND
  • Hall GM, Young C, Holdcroft A, Alaghband-Zadeh J. Substrate mobilisation during surgery. A comparison between halothane and fentanyl anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1978 Nov-Dec;33(10):924-30.

    PMID: 727414BACKGROUND
  • Fung D, Cohen M, Stewart S, Davies A. Can the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale be used to measure patient satisfaction with cataract care under topical local anesthesia and monitored sedation at a community hospital? Anesth Analg. 2005 Jun;100(6):1637-1643. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000154203.00434.23.

    PMID: 15920188BACKGROUND
  • Citerio G, Stocchetti N, Cormio M, Beretta L. Neuro-Link, a computer-assisted database for head injury in intensive care. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2000;142(7):769-76. doi: 10.1007/s007010070091.

    PMID: 10955671BACKGROUND
  • Piper I, Citerio G, Chambers I, Contant C, Enblad P, Fiddes H, Howells T, Kiening K, Nilsson P, Yau YH; BrainIT Group. The BrainIT group: concept and core dataset definition. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2003 Aug;145(8):615-28; discussion 628-9. doi: 10.1007/s00701-003-0066-6.

    PMID: 14520540BACKGROUND
  • Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Pocock SJ, Evans SJ; CONSORT Group. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. JAMA. 2006 Mar 8;295(10):1152-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.10.1152.

    PMID: 16522836BACKGROUND
  • Le Henanff A, Giraudeau B, Baron G, Ravaud P. Quality of reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials. JAMA. 2006 Mar 8;295(10):1147-51. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.10.1147.

    PMID: 16522835BACKGROUND
  • Kaul S, Diamond GA. Good enough: a primer on the analysis and interpretation of noninferiority trials. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Jul 4;145(1):62-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-1-200607040-00011.

    PMID: 16818930BACKGROUND
  • Citerio G, Franzosi MG, Latini R, Masson S, Barlera S, Guzzetti S, Pesenti A. Anaesthesiological strategies in elective craniotomy: randomized, equivalence, open trial--the NeuroMorfeo trial. Trials. 2009 Apr 6;10:19. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-19.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

SevofluraneFentanylRemifentanilPropofol

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Methyl EthersEthersOrganic ChemicalsHydrocarbons, FluorinatedHydrocarbons, HalogenatedHydrocarbonsPiperidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsPropionatesAcids, AcyclicCarboxylic AcidsPhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, Cyclic

Study Officials

  • Giuseppe Citerio, MD

    Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo Monza

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Antonio Pesenti, MD

    UniversitĂ  delgi Studi Milano Bicocca

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Maria Grazia Franzosi, PhD

    Istituto Di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Roberto Latini, MD

    Istituto Di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2008

First Posted

August 26, 2008

Study Start

December 1, 2007

Primary Completion

March 1, 2009

Study Completion

December 1, 2009

Last Updated

September 8, 2011

Record last verified: 2011-09

Locations