Anesthesiological Strategies in Elective Craniotomy
Neuromorfeo
2 other identifiers
interventional
411
1 country
15
Brief Summary
This protocol, NeuroMorfeo, aims to assess equivalence between volatile and intravenous anesthetics for neurosurgical procedures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Dec 2007
15 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 22, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 26, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2009
CompletedSeptember 8, 2011
September 1, 2011
1.2 years
August 22, 2008
September 7, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Post-anesthesia awaking time, assessed as the interval (min:sec)required to reach an ALDRETE score ≥ 9
From estubation to aldrete score ≥ 9
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Neurovegetative stress
From induction of anesthesia to 24 hours after surgery
Intraoperative and post-operative adverse events assessment
From induction of anesthesia to 24 hours after surgery
Brain relaxation evaluated by a blinded neurosurgeon
From induction of anesthesia to 24 hours after surgery
Patient's satisfaction
From induction of anesthesia to 24 hours after surgery
Costs of the three strategies
From induction of anesthesia to end of surgery
Study Arms (3)
IF
EXPERIMENTALSevoflurane (Inhalation)+Fentanyl
IR
EXPERIMENTALSevoflurane (Inhalation)+Remifentanyl
ER
EXPERIMENTALPropofol (Endovenous)+ Remifentanyl
Interventions
Sevoflurane is maintained in a MAC range (0.75% to 1.25%) and fentanyl (2-3 microg/kg/hr or 0.7 microg/kg boluses). Just before incision of the scalp, fentanyl (1-2microg/kg/hr) can be supplemented, if necessary
Sevoflurane is maintained in a MAC range (0.75% to 1.25%) and remifentanil (0.5-0.25 microg/kg/min reduced to 0.05-0.1 microg/kg/min after dural opening). Just before incision of the scalp, remifentanil can be supplemented, if necessary
Propofol is maintained with continuous infusion at 10 mg/kg/h for the first 10 minutes, then reduced to 8 mg/kg/h for the following 10 minutes and reduced to 6mg/kg/h thereafter and remifentanil 0.5-0.25 microg/kg/min reduced to 0.05-0.1 microg/kg/min after dural opening. Just before incision of the scalp, remifentanil could be supplemented, if necessary
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient scheduled for elective intracranial surgery under general anesthesia for a supratentorial mass lesion in the next 24 hours;
- Physical state, evaluated with the ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists ) classification I (normal healthy patient), II (patient with mild systemic disease), or III (patient with severe systemic disease);
- Age 18-75 years;
- Normal preoperative level of consciousness, i.e. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) = 15;
- No signs of intracranial hypertension.
You may not qualify if:
- Severe cardiovascular pathology, as uncontrolled arterial hypertension, documented reduced coronary reserve.
- Renal or liver disease precluding the use of either anesthetic technique.
- Pregnancy .
- Known allergies to any anesthetic agent.
- Reduced preoperative level of consciousness, i.e.
- Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) \< 15.
- Body weight greater than 120 kg.
- History of drug abuse or psychiatric conditions.
- Documented disturbance of the hypothalamic region.Refusal to sign consent form.
- Participation in other clinical trials.
- Delayed awakening, because, due to the location or size of the lesion, postoperative sedation and mechanical ventilation are planned.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (15)
Policlinico Consorziale di Bari
Bari, Italy
Ospedale Bellaria Bologna
Bologna, 40100, Italy
IRCCS Fondazione San Raffaele Milano
Milan, 20100, Italy
Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri - Dipartimento di Ricerca Cardiovascolare-
Milan, 20100, Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo
Monza, 20052, Italy
Ospedale Maggiore della CaritĂ di Novara
Novara, 28100, Italy
Ospedale di Padova
Padua, 35128, Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera di Parma
Parma, 43100, Italy
Policlinico "A. Gemelli" Roma
Rome, Italy
Policlinico "Umberto I" Roma
Rome, Italy
Azienda Universitaria Senese
Siena, 53100, Italy
Ospedale San Giovanni Bosco Torino
Turin, 10057, Italy
Ospedale San giovanni Battista Torino
Turin, Italy
Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi Varese
Varese, 21100, Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Verona
Verona, 37121, Italy
Related Publications (26)
Hans P, Bonhomme V. Why we still use intravenous drugs as the basic regimen for neurosurgical anaesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006 Oct;19(5):498-503. doi: 10.1097/01.aco.0000245274.69292.ad.
PMID: 16960481BACKGROUNDTodd MM, Warner DS, Sokoll MD, Maktabi MA, Hindman BJ, Scamman FL, Kirschner J. A prospective, comparative trial of three anesthetics for elective supratentorial craniotomy. Propofol/fentanyl, isoflurane/nitrous oxide, and fentanyl/nitrous oxide. Anesthesiology. 1993 Jun;78(6):1005-20. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199306000-00002.
PMID: 8512094BACKGROUNDEngelhard K, Werner C. Inhalational or intravenous anesthetics for craniotomies? Pro inhalational. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006 Oct;19(5):504-8. doi: 10.1097/01.aco.0000245275.76916.87.
PMID: 16960482BACKGROUNDMagni G, Baisi F, La Rosa I, Imperiale C, Fabbrini V, Pennacchiotti ML, Rosa G. No difference in emergence time and early cognitive function between sevoflurane-fentanyl and propofol-remifentanil in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial intracranial surgery. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2005 Jul;17(3):134-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ana.0000167447.33969.16.
PMID: 16037733BACKGROUNDTalke P, Caldwell JE, Brown R, Dodson B, Howley J, Richardson CA. A comparison of three anesthetic techniques in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial intracranial surgery. Anesth Analg. 2002 Aug;95(2):430-5, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200208000-00036.
PMID: 12145066BACKGROUNDGomberg-Maitland M, Frison L, Halperin JL. Active-control clinical trials to establish equivalence or noninferiority: methodological and statistical concepts linked to quality. Am Heart J. 2003 Sep;146(3):398-403. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00324-7.
PMID: 12947355BACKGROUNDAldrete JA. The post-anesthesia recovery score revisited. J Clin Anesth. 1995 Feb;7(1):89-91. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(94)00001-k. No abstract available.
PMID: 7772368BACKGROUNDBalakrishnan G, Raudzens P, Samra SK, Song K, Boening JA, Bosek V, Jamerson BD, Warner DS. A comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in patients undergoing surgery for intracranial mass lesions. Anesth Analg. 2000 Jul;91(1):163-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200007000-00030.
PMID: 10866905BACKGROUNDDel Gaudio A, Ciritella P, Perrotta F, Puopolo M, Lauta E, Mastronardi P, De Vivo P. Remifentanil vs fentanyl with a target controlled propofol infusion in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial lesions. Minerva Anestesiol. 2006 May;72(5):309-19. English, Italian.
PMID: 16675939BACKGROUNDKlingstedt C, Giesecke K, Hamberger B, Jarnberg PO. High- and low-dose fentanyl anaesthesia: circulatory and plasma catecholamine responses during cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth. 1987 Feb;59(2):184-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/59.2.184.
PMID: 3828169BACKGROUNDNishiyama T, Yamashita K, Yokoyama T. Stress hormone changes in general anesthesia of long duration: isoflurane-nitrous oxide vs sevoflurane-nitrous oxide anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 2005 Dec;17(8):586-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.03.009.
PMID: 16427527BACKGROUNDDesborough JP. The stress response to trauma and surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jul;85(1):109-17. doi: 10.1093/bja/85.1.109. No abstract available.
PMID: 10927999BACKGROUNDBent JM, Paterson JL, Mashiter K, Hall GM. Effects of high-dose fentanyl anaesthesia on the established metabolic and endocrine response to surgery. Anaesthesia. 1984 Jan;39(1):19-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1984.tb09447.x.
PMID: 6696213BACKGROUNDHeesen M, Deinsberger W, Dietrich GV, Detsch O, Boldt J, Hempelmann G. Increase of interleukin-6 plasma levels after elective craniotomy: influence of interleukin-10 and catecholamines. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1996;138(1):77-80. doi: 10.1007/BF01411728.
PMID: 8686529BACKGROUNDLedowski T, Bein B, Hanss R, Paris A, Fudickar W, Scholz J, Tonner PH. Neuroendocrine stress response and heart rate variability: a comparison of total intravenous versus balanced anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2005 Dec;101(6):1700-1705. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000184041.32175.14.
PMID: 16301244BACKGROUNDGuzzetti S, Borroni E, Garbelli PE, Ceriani E, Della Bella P, Montano N, Cogliati C, Somers VK, Malliani A, Porta A. Symbolic dynamics of heart rate variability: a probe to investigate cardiac autonomic modulation. Circulation. 2005 Jul 26;112(4):465-70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.518449. Epub 2005 Jul 18.
PMID: 16027252BACKGROUNDOlsen KS, Pedersen CB, Madsen JB, Ravn LI, Schifter S. Vasoactive modulators during and after craniotomy: relation to postoperative hypertension. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2002 Jul;14(3):171-9. doi: 10.1097/00008506-200207000-00001.
PMID: 12172288BACKGROUNDLeslie K, Troedel S. Does anaesthesia care affect the outcome following craniotomy? J Clin Neurosci. 2002 May;9(3):231-6. doi: 10.1054/jocn.2001.0934. No abstract available.
PMID: 12093125BACKGROUNDHall GM, Young C, Holdcroft A, Alaghband-Zadeh J. Substrate mobilisation during surgery. A comparison between halothane and fentanyl anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1978 Nov-Dec;33(10):924-30.
PMID: 727414BACKGROUNDFung D, Cohen M, Stewart S, Davies A. Can the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale be used to measure patient satisfaction with cataract care under topical local anesthesia and monitored sedation at a community hospital? Anesth Analg. 2005 Jun;100(6):1637-1643. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000154203.00434.23.
PMID: 15920188BACKGROUNDCiterio G, Stocchetti N, Cormio M, Beretta L. Neuro-Link, a computer-assisted database for head injury in intensive care. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2000;142(7):769-76. doi: 10.1007/s007010070091.
PMID: 10955671BACKGROUNDPiper I, Citerio G, Chambers I, Contant C, Enblad P, Fiddes H, Howells T, Kiening K, Nilsson P, Yau YH; BrainIT Group. The BrainIT group: concept and core dataset definition. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2003 Aug;145(8):615-28; discussion 628-9. doi: 10.1007/s00701-003-0066-6.
PMID: 14520540BACKGROUNDPiaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Pocock SJ, Evans SJ; CONSORT Group. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. JAMA. 2006 Mar 8;295(10):1152-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.10.1152.
PMID: 16522836BACKGROUNDLe Henanff A, Giraudeau B, Baron G, Ravaud P. Quality of reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials. JAMA. 2006 Mar 8;295(10):1147-51. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.10.1147.
PMID: 16522835BACKGROUNDKaul S, Diamond GA. Good enough: a primer on the analysis and interpretation of noninferiority trials. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Jul 4;145(1):62-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-1-200607040-00011.
PMID: 16818930BACKGROUNDCiterio G, Franzosi MG, Latini R, Masson S, Barlera S, Guzzetti S, Pesenti A. Anaesthesiological strategies in elective craniotomy: randomized, equivalence, open trial--the NeuroMorfeo trial. Trials. 2009 Apr 6;10:19. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-19.
PMID: 19348675DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Giuseppe Citerio, MD
Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo Monza
- STUDY CHAIR
Antonio Pesenti, MD
UniversitĂ delgi Studi Milano Bicocca
- STUDY CHAIR
Maria Grazia Franzosi, PhD
Istituto Di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri
- STUDY CHAIR
Roberto Latini, MD
Istituto Di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 22, 2008
First Posted
August 26, 2008
Study Start
December 1, 2007
Primary Completion
March 1, 2009
Study Completion
December 1, 2009
Last Updated
September 8, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-09