NCT00735254

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of using a pulsed dye laser (the VBEAM), a non-ablative laser (the Affirm) and a combination of both lasers to improve the appearance of your surgical scar. Both the pulsed dye laser and Affirm laser are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of scars. Surgical scars are a type of scar that can benefit from laser therapy. Redness and the appearance of small blood vessels near the surface of the skin (telangiectasias) develop in such scars as part of the normal healing process and usually spontaneously remit, but often slowly and incompletely. In many cases, lasers can accelerate the clearing of this redness and also improve scar texture.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
3

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2008

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2008

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 13, 2008

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 14, 2008

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2009

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2010

Completed
8.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 8, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

February 8, 2018

Status Verified

February 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

August 13, 2008

Results QC Date

April 24, 2017

Last Update Submit

February 7, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

postsurgical

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Efficacy of PDL vs Affirm Laser vs Combined Laser Treatments in Appearance of Surgical Scar

    The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of the 585-nm pulsed dye laser (PDL) and 1440-nm Affirm laser in the treatment of surgical scars starting one week after closure of transverse abdominal incision.

    1 year

Study Arms (4)

Pulsed dye laser

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

PDL Patient will be have scar treated with pulsed dye laser.

Device: pulsed dye laser

Affirm laser

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patient will be have scar treated with Affirm Laser

Device: Affirm Laser

combined PDL and Affirm Lasers

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patient will be have scar treated with combined Affirm + PDL

Device: combined PDL and Affirm Lasers

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Patient will be have scar treated with Placebo

Other: Placebo

Interventions

patient will have scar treated with pulsed dye laser

Also known as: VBEAM
Pulsed dye laser

patient will have scar treated with Affirm laser

Also known as: non-ablative laser
Affirm laser

patient will have scar treated with Affirm and pulsed dye lasers

Also known as: VBEAM, non-ablative laser
combined PDL and Affirm Lasers
PlaceboOTHER

patient will receive no treatment

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 years and older
  • No significant medical illness
  • Surgical procedure that involves closure of the transverse abdominal incision performed in the department of dermatology and plastic surgery at the Cleveland Clinic main campus.
  • Subjects with the willingness and ability to understand and provide informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Under 18 years of age
  • Pregnancy or Lactation
  • Subjects currently taking blood thinners or who have had chemotherapy or radiation within the last 6 months
  • Subjects with liver/kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, connective tissue disease or who are immunocompromised
  • Subjects with a known susceptibility to keloid formation or hypertrophic scarring
  • Subjects who are unable to understand the protocol or to give informed consent
  • Subjects with mental illness
  • Subjects with obvious non-healing wound

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cleveland Clinical Foundation

Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Lasers, Dye

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

LasersOptical DevicesEquipment and SuppliesRadiation Equipment and Supplies

Limitations and Caveats

protocol was not followed and data was not collected. reported to IRB, closed study. PI left institution

Results Point of Contact

Title
Edward Galiczynski, MD
Organization
Arizona Dermatology and Cosmetic

Study Officials

  • Rebecca Tung, MD

    The Cleveland Clinic

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 13, 2008

First Posted

August 14, 2008

Study Start

July 1, 2008

Primary Completion

July 1, 2009

Study Completion

January 1, 2010

Last Updated

February 8, 2018

Results First Posted

February 8, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations