NCT00729625

Brief Summary

Many patients who have sustained strokes are unable to effectively use their hemiparetic upper extremity. Limited mobility in the performance of daily activities, such as eating or dressing, adversely affects their quality of life and compromises independence. Rehabilitation techniques engaging the hemiparetic limb in repetitive task practice (RTP) may improve upper extremity function and quality of life in patients with stroke, but costs limit the number of patients that can utilize this type of therapy. Advances in microprocessor design and function make the use of an assistive device as an adjunct to RTP plausible. An innovative assistive repetitive motion (ARM) device using an "air muscle" has been developed specifically for the rehabilitation of the hemiparetic upper extremity. The primary aim of the proposed study is to collect pilot data to estimate the clinical effectiveness of using the ARM device in conjunction with RTP to improve upper extremity motor function and the quality of life of patients with stroke. Twenty sub-acute (3 to 9 mos. post-stoke) patients will be randomized to a RTP only or ARM + RTP group. The RTP group will receive 15 days (4 hours per day) of intensive one-on-one RTP therapy. The ARM + RTP group will use the ARM device for 2 hours per day and receive 2 hours of intensive RTP per day for 15 days. Clinical motor function and quality of life measures will be taken before and after the interventions and two months later. We hypothesize that the ARM + RTP group will exhibit greater improvements in motor function and quality of life measures than the RTP only group.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
24

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for early_phase_1 stroke

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2005

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2005

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2007

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2007

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 5, 2008

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 7, 2008

Completed
Last Updated

May 23, 2016

Status Verified

April 1, 2005

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

August 5, 2008

Last Update Submit

May 20, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

stroke, rehabilitation, robotics

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Wolf Motor Function Test

    8 Weeks

Interventions

The device has a small "air muscle" that when activated will slowly lift their fingers and wrist from your resting wrist position. This device is classified as a non-significant risk device by the FDA (see attached letter dated 1-15-05). The patient should not experience any pain or discomfort during this stretching activity. If they do experience any pain or discomfort they can activate a stop switch located on the control box with their unimpaired hand.

Also known as: KMI Hand Mentor

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may not qualify if:

  • a score of less than 24 on the Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination or a score of 36 or below on the Token Test of the Multilingual Aphasia Examination
  • a first stroke less than 3 months or more than 9 months prior to the initiation of therapy
  • less than 18 years old
  • clinical judgment of excessive frailty or lack of stamina (e.g., cannot attend to instructions, stay awake, engage in functional activities, etc.)
  • serious uncontrolled medical conditions
  • excessive pain in any joint of the more affected extremity that could limit ability to cooperate with the intervention, as judged by the examining clinician
  • passive range of motion less than 45 degrees for: abduction, flexion or external rotation at shoulder, or pronation of forearm; or greater than 30 degrees flexion contracture at any finger joint (patients who pass the motor criteria specified above do not tend to have the type of pain or limitation of movement that would exclude them from treatment)
  • unable to stand independently for 2 min., transfer independently to and from the toilet or perform sit-to-stand
  • current participation in other pharmacological or physical intervention studies, or have received injections of anti-spasticity drugs into upper extremity musculature within the past 3 months, or wish to have drugs injected in the foreseeable future
  • receiving any anti-spasticity drugs orally at the time of expected participation
  • received phenol injections less than 12 months prior to receiving therapy
  • contemplating a move from proximity to the treatment site in less than 1 year from the randomization date. Prospective patients who qualify but who have profound postural instability will undergo the intervention while walking with contact guarding or, when feasible, using their leg(s) and more involved arm to propel a wheelchair.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Kutner NG, Zhang R, Butler AJ, Wolf SL, Alberts JL. Quality-of-life change associated with robotic-assisted therapy to improve hand motor function in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther. 2010 Apr;90(4):493-504. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090160. Epub 2010 Feb 25.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Interventions

Exoskeleton Device

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Equipment and Supplies

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
early phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
NIH

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2008

First Posted

August 7, 2008

Study Start

April 1, 2005

Primary Completion

March 1, 2007

Study Completion

March 1, 2007

Last Updated

May 23, 2016

Record last verified: 2005-04