Air Muscle and Task Practice in Upper Limb Stroke Rehab
2 other identifiers
interventional
24
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Many patients who have sustained strokes are unable to effectively use their hemiparetic upper extremity. Limited mobility in the performance of daily activities, such as eating or dressing, adversely affects their quality of life and compromises independence. Rehabilitation techniques engaging the hemiparetic limb in repetitive task practice (RTP) may improve upper extremity function and quality of life in patients with stroke, but costs limit the number of patients that can utilize this type of therapy. Advances in microprocessor design and function make the use of an assistive device as an adjunct to RTP plausible. An innovative assistive repetitive motion (ARM) device using an "air muscle" has been developed specifically for the rehabilitation of the hemiparetic upper extremity. The primary aim of the proposed study is to collect pilot data to estimate the clinical effectiveness of using the ARM device in conjunction with RTP to improve upper extremity motor function and the quality of life of patients with stroke. Twenty sub-acute (3 to 9 mos. post-stoke) patients will be randomized to a RTP only or ARM + RTP group. The RTP group will receive 15 days (4 hours per day) of intensive one-on-one RTP therapy. The ARM + RTP group will use the ARM device for 2 hours per day and receive 2 hours of intensive RTP per day for 15 days. Clinical motor function and quality of life measures will be taken before and after the interventions and two months later. We hypothesize that the ARM + RTP group will exhibit greater improvements in motor function and quality of life measures than the RTP only group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for early_phase_1 stroke
Started Apr 2005
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 5, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 7, 2008
CompletedMay 23, 2016
April 1, 2005
1.9 years
August 5, 2008
May 20, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Wolf Motor Function Test
8 Weeks
Interventions
The device has a small "air muscle" that when activated will slowly lift their fingers and wrist from your resting wrist position. This device is classified as a non-significant risk device by the FDA (see attached letter dated 1-15-05). The patient should not experience any pain or discomfort during this stretching activity. If they do experience any pain or discomfort they can activate a stop switch located on the control box with their unimpaired hand.
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- a score of less than 24 on the Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination or a score of 36 or below on the Token Test of the Multilingual Aphasia Examination
- a first stroke less than 3 months or more than 9 months prior to the initiation of therapy
- less than 18 years old
- clinical judgment of excessive frailty or lack of stamina (e.g., cannot attend to instructions, stay awake, engage in functional activities, etc.)
- serious uncontrolled medical conditions
- excessive pain in any joint of the more affected extremity that could limit ability to cooperate with the intervention, as judged by the examining clinician
- passive range of motion less than 45 degrees for: abduction, flexion or external rotation at shoulder, or pronation of forearm; or greater than 30 degrees flexion contracture at any finger joint (patients who pass the motor criteria specified above do not tend to have the type of pain or limitation of movement that would exclude them from treatment)
- unable to stand independently for 2 min., transfer independently to and from the toilet or perform sit-to-stand
- current participation in other pharmacological or physical intervention studies, or have received injections of anti-spasticity drugs into upper extremity musculature within the past 3 months, or wish to have drugs injected in the foreseeable future
- receiving any anti-spasticity drugs orally at the time of expected participation
- received phenol injections less than 12 months prior to receiving therapy
- contemplating a move from proximity to the treatment site in less than 1 year from the randomization date. Prospective patients who qualify but who have profound postural instability will undergo the intervention while walking with contact guarding or, when feasible, using their leg(s) and more involved arm to propel a wheelchair.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Kutner NG, Zhang R, Butler AJ, Wolf SL, Alberts JL. Quality-of-life change associated with robotic-assisted therapy to improve hand motor function in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther. 2010 Apr;90(4):493-504. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090160. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
PMID: 20185616DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 5, 2008
First Posted
August 7, 2008
Study Start
April 1, 2005
Primary Completion
March 1, 2007
Study Completion
March 1, 2007
Last Updated
May 23, 2016
Record last verified: 2005-04