Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) Thrombosis: Reverse Taper Versus Non-tapered Catheters
1 other identifier
interventional
339
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare two different marketed PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) designs. Clotting rates, procedural bleeding and ease of catheter insertion will be compared. It is hypothesized that the non-tapered design has a lower clotting rate and is easier to place than the tapered design. Bleeding rates are expected to be about the same.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2008
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 31, 2008
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 6, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 27, 2018
CompletedApril 27, 2018
March 1, 2018
2.4 years
July 31, 2008
March 30, 2018
March 30, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evidence of PICC-related Venous Thrombosis
Number participants with vein thrombosis
28 days, PICC removal or hospital discharge
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Post-operative Bleeding
Day 1
Symptomatic PICC-related Venous Thrombosis
Procedure through 28 days
Study Arms (2)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORTapered PICC
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORNon-tapered PICC
Interventions
Standard peripheral central catheter placement in the Brachial, Basilic or Cephalic veins
Standard peripheral central catheter placement in the Brachial, Basilic or Cephalic veins
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All inpatients, age 18 to 90, in need of de novo central venous access with a double lumen catheter indication of \> 2 weeks
- Informed consent and HIPAA consent forms discussed and signed by patient or their authorized representative
You may not qualify if:
- Skin related problems around the insertion site (infection, phlebitis, scars)
- History of mastectomy/axillary dissection on insertion side
- Coagulopathy with an INR of \> 2.0
- Thrombocytopenia with platelets \< 25,000 uL
- Renal insufficiency with a creatinine of \> 3.0 mg/dL
- Documented current upper extremity or central venous thrombosis
- Hypercoagulable states (protein C or S deficiency, AT-III deficiency, lupus anticoagulant)
- Catheters needed for therapy within less than an hour (emergent placement not allowing sufficient time for proper research consent and randomization)
- Patient has already been enrolled in this research study
- Life expectancy less than 1 month
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Related Publications (1)
Itkin M, Mondshein JI, Stavropoulos SW, Shlansky-Goldberg RD, Soulen MC, Trerotola SO. Peripherally inserted central catheter thrombosis--reverse tapered versus nontapered catheters: a randomized controlled study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Jan;25(1):85-91.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.10.009. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
PMID: 24268631RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Associate Professor of Radiology
- Organization
- Penn Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maxim Itkin, MD
University of Pennsylvania
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 31, 2008
First Posted
August 6, 2008
Study Start
August 1, 2008
Primary Completion
January 1, 2011
Study Completion
August 1, 2011
Last Updated
April 27, 2018
Results First Posted
April 27, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03