A Pilot Study of Rehabilitation Among Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Survivors: the RETURN Trial
RETURN
Returning to Everyday Tasks Utilizing Rehabilitation Networks (RETURN)
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization saves lives but often does so at a high personal cost to ICU survivors who frequently experience significant cognitive impairment and an array of physical and functional disabilities that limit their recovery and quality of life. While the problems experienced by these patients are likely amenable to rehabilitation, few ICU survivors receive focused rehabilitation following hospital discharge. The purpose of this study is to initiate and test the feasibility of a complex intervention incorporating a cognitive, physical, and functional rehabilitation program at the time of hospital discharge and implement this 12 week program using in-home visits and tele-technology. We hypothesize that this interdisciplinary rehabilitation program, initiated at hospital discharge and implemented using in-home visits and tele-technology, will result in improved recovery of neuropsychological and physical performance and overall functional status.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2008
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 10, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 15, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedSeptember 11, 2018
September 1, 2018
1.2 years
July 10, 2008
September 10, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Tower Test - a psychometric measure of executive functioning
3 and 12 months post hospital discharge
Timed Up and Go (TUG), a timed test assessing physical strength and gait speed
3 and 12 months post-hospital discharge
Step Activity Monitor (SAM), a device that measures total level of participant activity
3 and 12 months post-hospital discharge
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Pfeffers FAQ, a brief measure of higher order (IADL) functioning.
3 and 12 months post-hospital discharge
SF-36 global scores
3 and 12 months post hospital discharge
Katz Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale
3 and 12 months post hospital discharge
Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC)
3 and 12 months post hospital discharge
Mortality
Within 12 months of hospital discharge
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Group 1 - Control
NO INTERVENTIONPatients (Controls) will not receive formal (study-related) rehabilitation interventions and will only receive usual care.
Group 2 - Intervention
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in the experimental group will receive a focused set of interdisciplinary home-based interventions over a 12 week period.
Interventions
A multicomponent program of cognitive, physical, and functional rehabilitation interventions will be delivered to patients in their home environments over a focused 12 week period with the aid of tele-technology to utilize the expertise of physical therapy, occupational therapy, and neuropsychology.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Enrollment in the BRAIN-ICU study (AG027472-01A1), the presence of cognitive impairment defined via an abnormal Tower Test score (at the time of hospital discharge) and/or physical impairment defined per standard cutpoints for the Timed Up and Go Test (at the time of hospital discharge);
- The ability to walk with or without assistance.
You may not qualify if:
- Moderate to severe dementia on ICU admission based on a standardized surrogate assessment (as this would prohibit patients from functioning independently at home);
- The presence of normal cognition and normal physical function at the time of screening (i.e. hospital discharge) which would eliminate the need for rehabilitation;
- Lacking telephone service with an analog telephone line (which would preclude the tele-video component of the RETURN intervention).
- Live greater than 125 miles from Nashville
- Patient is unable to provide informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Vanderbilt Universitylead
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicinecollaborator
- Duke Universitycollaborator
- Durham VA Medical Centercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
E Wesley Ely, MD, MPH
Vanderbilt University School of Medicine
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Helen Hoenig, MD, MPH
Duke University Medical Center, Durham VA Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 10, 2008
First Posted
July 15, 2008
Study Start
July 1, 2008
Primary Completion
September 1, 2009
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
September 11, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-09