In Situ Caries of Fluoride Toothpastes
Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy From the Retention Phase of Fluoride Delivery of Fluoride Toothpastes Using an in Situ Caries Model
1 other identifier
interventional
60
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study is to evaluate the effect of fluoride dentifrices on enamel with artificial caries lesions in an in situ model.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Nov 2007
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 2, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 19, 2012
CompletedApril 22, 2013
March 1, 2013
5 months
July 1, 2008
September 14, 2010
April 18, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean Percentage Surface Microhardness Recovery (%SMHR) of Enamel Specimens Exposed to NaF/Carbopol Toothpaste (1400 ppmF), NaF Toothpaste (1350ppmF) Compared to NaMFP/NaF Toothpaste (1450ppmF)
%SMHR test was used to assess mineralization status of enamel specimens using a Wilson 2100 Hardness tester. %SMHR was determined by measuring the length of the indentations of enamel specimens. An increase in the indentation length compared to the baseline indicates softening while decrease in the indentation length represents rehardening of enamel surface. %SMHR was calculated from indentation values of enamel specimens at baseline (B), after intra-oral exposure (R) and after in-vitro demineralization (D) using formula: \[(D-R)/ (D-B)\]\*100.
Baseline to 14 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Mean %SMHR of Enamel Specimens Exposed to NaF/Carbopol Toothpaste (1400 ppmF), NaF Toothpaste (1350ppmF), NaMFP/NaF Toothpaste (1450ppmF), NaF Toothpaste (250ppmF) and Placebo Toothpaste (0ppmF)
Baseline to 14 days
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Enamel Fluoride Uptake
Baseline to 14 days
Study Arms (5)
Sodium Fluoride (NaF) toothpaste[1350 parts per million(ppm)F]
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants to brush their natural teeth twice daily with a full ribbon of NaF toothpaste (1350 ppm F as NaF) for one timed minute, after removing their partial denture from their mouth.
NaF/Carbopol toothpaste (1400 ppm F)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants to brush their natural teeth twice daily with a full ribbon of NaF and 0.5% carbopol toothpaste (1450 ppm F as NaF) for one timed minute, after removing their partial denture from their mouth.
NaMFP/NaF toothpaste (1450 ppm F)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants to brush their natural teeth twice daily with a full ribbon of NaMFPand NaF toothpaste (1450 ppm F - 1000 ppm F as NaMFP and 450 ppm F as NaF) for one timed minute, after removing their partial denture from their mouth.
NaF toothpaste (250 ppm F)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants to brush their natural teeth twice daily with a full ribbon of NaF toothpaste (250 ppm F as NaF) for one timed minute, after removing their partial denture from their mouth.
Placebo toothpaste (0 ppm F)
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants to brush their natural teeth twice daily with a full ribbon of fluoride free toothpaste (0 ppm F) for one timed minute, after removing their partial denture from their mouth.
Interventions
Various fluoride toothpastes containing 1350 ppm F, 1450 ppm F, 1400 ppm F and 250 ppm F
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Consent: Demonstrates understanding of the study and willingness to participate as evidenced by voluntary written informed consent and has received a signed and dated copy of the informed consent form.
- Age:Aged between 18 and 78 years.
- Compliance:Understands and is willing, able and likely to comply with all study procedures and restrictions.
- General Health:Good general health with (in the opinion of the investigator) no clinically significant and/or relevant abnormalities of medical history or oral examination that could interfere with subject safety during the study period.
- Diagnosis: Oral - i. Currently living in the Indianapolis area which is a fluoridated community (1 ppm F). ii. Currently wearing a removable mandibular partial denture with sufficient room in the posterior buccal flange area to accommodate two enamel specimens (required dimensions 12 x 7 millimeters (mm). iii. Willing and capable of wearing their removable partial dentures 24 hours per day during each two week treatment period. iv.All restorations in a good state of repair.
- Salivary Flow:Have a salivary flow rate in the range of normal values (unstimulated whole saliva flow rate = 0.2 ml/minute; gum base stimulated whole saliva flow rate = 0.8 ml/minute).
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy:Women who are known to be pregnant or who are intending to become pregnant over the duration of the study. No pregnancy test will be required.
- Breast-feeding:Women who are breast-feeding.
- Allergy/Intolerance: Known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the study materials (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients.
- Clinical Study/Experimental Medication:Participation in another clinical study or receipt of an investigational drug within 30 days of the first treatment visit, with the exception of study T3157495 where the wash in period prior to treatment is sufficient.
- Antibiotics:Currently taking antibiotics or have taken antibiotics in the 2 weeks prior to the screening visit.
- Fluoride:Taking fluoride supplements for medical reasons.
- Dental Health: Current active caries or periodontal disease that may compromise the study or health of the subjects.
- Personnel: a) A member of the site study staff, b) An employee of the sponsor, c) Any employee of any toothpaste manufacturer or their spouse or family member.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKlinelead
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- GSK Response Center
- Organization
- GlaxoSmithKline
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
GSK Clinical Trials
GlaxoSmithKline
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 1, 2008
First Posted
July 2, 2008
Study Start
November 1, 2007
Primary Completion
April 1, 2008
Study Completion
April 1, 2008
Last Updated
April 22, 2013
Results First Posted
November 19, 2012
Record last verified: 2013-03