A Study Comparing the Efficacy of an Alpha Blocker Versus an Alpha Blocker Plus Solifenacin in Men With Overactive Bladder
A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Any Alpha Blocker Monotherapy and Any Alpha Blocker Plus Solifenacin in Men With Residual Overactive Bladder Symptoms of Urinary Frequency and Urgency With/Without Urgency Incontinence After Previous Monotherapy With Any Alpha Blocker
1 other identifier
interventional
94
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to explore additional benefit of solifenacin after 12-week treatment, compared with alpha blocker monotherapy in men with residual OAB symptoms.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jun 2008
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 16, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 17, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2010
CompletedJanuary 7, 2016
January 1, 2016
1.7 years
June 16, 2008
January 6, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Achievement level of patients' individual satisfaction
At weeks 4 and 12
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Changes in urgency episodes
At weeks 4 and 12
Changes in OAB symptom scores
At weeks 4 and 12
Changes in QoL score by OAB-q
At weeks 4 and 12
Study Arms (2)
Alpha blocker and placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORAlpha blocker and solifenacin
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Persistent symptoms of OAB as verified by the 3 day voiding diary, defined by:
- symptoms of urinary urgency (defined as a level of \>=3 in a 5 point urgency scale) at least two episode per 24 hours and
- symptoms of urinary frequency ( \>8 micturitions per 24 hours)
- On a stable dose of tamsulosin for at least 1 month
You may not qualify if:
- Previous history of acute urinary retention
- Patients have a baseline post-void residual (PVR) which exceeded 50% of voided urine volume
- Any condition that is a contraindication for anticholinergic treatment, including uncontrolled narrow-angled glaucoma, urinary retention or gastric retention
- Symptomatic acute urinary tract infection (UTI) during the screening period
- Treatment within the 14 days preceding randomization, or expected to initiate treatment during the study with any anticholinergic drugs and drug treatment for overactive bladder
- A 5-alpha reductase inhibitor if started less than 3 months prior to screening
- Patients with previous urethral, prostate or bladder neck surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- KYU-SUNG LEElead
- Astellas Pharma Korea, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (3)
Unknown Facility
Cheonan, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Pusan, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Seoul, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Central Contact
Astellas Pharma Inc
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 16, 2008
First Posted
June 17, 2008
Study Start
June 1, 2008
Primary Completion
March 1, 2010
Study Completion
March 1, 2010
Last Updated
January 7, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-01