NCT00697190

Brief Summary

This study will evaluate the fitting characteristics and physiological response of two toric lenses manufactured by Vistakon.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
39

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2008

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2008

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 10, 2008

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 13, 2008

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2008

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2008

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 1, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

May 22, 2015

Status Verified

May 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

June 10, 2008

Results QC Date

September 9, 2010

Last Update Submit

May 6, 2015

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (15)

  • Assessment of Conjunctival Hyperemia in Subjects That Are High Myopes (Have a High Degree of Nearsightedness)

    Conjunctival hyperemia measures the redness across the white of the eye. The investigator used a grading scale of 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe.

    after 6 hours of wear

  • Assessment of Conjunctival Hyperemia in Subjects That Are Hyperopes (Farsighted)

    Conjunctival hyperemia measures the redness across the white of the eye. The investigator used a grading scale of 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe.

    after 6 hours of wear

  • Assessment of Conjunctival Hyperemia in Subjects That Are Oblique Astigmats (Have an Abnormally Curved Cornea)

    Conjunctival hyperemia measures the redness across the white of the eye. The investigator used a grading scale of 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe.

    after 6 hours of wear

  • Assessment of Limbal Hyperemia in Subjects That Are High Myopes (Have a High Degree of Nearsightedness)

    Limbal hyperemia measures the redness around the edge of the cornea. The investigator used a grading scale of 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe.

    after 6 hours of wear

  • Assessment of Limbal Hyperemia in Subjects That Are Hyperopes (Farsighted)

    Limbal hyperemia measures the redness around the edge of the cornea. The investigator used a grading scale of 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe.

    after 6 hours of wear

  • Assessment of Limbal Hyperemia in Subjects That Are Oblique Astigmats (Have an Abnormally Curved Cornea)

    Limbal hyperemia measures the redness around the edge of the cornea. The investigator used a grading scale of 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe.

    after 6 hours of wear

  • Assessment of Corneal Staining in Subjects That Are High Myopes (Have a High Degree of Nearsightedness)

    Corneal staining measures changes to the surface of the cornea, as evaluated by the degree of staining with sodium fluorescein solution. The investigator used a grading scale of 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe.

    after 6 hours of wear

  • Assessment of Corneal Staining in Subjects That Are Hyperopes (Farsighted)

    Corneal staining measures changes to the surface of the cornea, as evaluated by the degree of staining with sodium fluorescein solution. The investigator used a grading scale of 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe.

    after 6 hours of wear

  • Assessment of Corneal Staining in Subjects That Are Oblique Astigmats (Have an Abnormally Curved Cornea)

    Corneal staining measures changes to the surface of the cornea, as evaluated by the degree of staining with sodium fluorescein solution. The investigator used a grading scale of 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe.

    after 6 hours of wear

  • Assessment of Conjunctival Staining in Subjects That Are High Myopes (Have a High Degree of Nearsightedness)

    Conjunctival staining measures the changes to the conjunctival surface as evaluated by the degree of staining with sodium fluorescein solution. The investigator used a grading scale of 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe.

    after 6 hours of wear

  • Assessment of Conjunctival Staining in Subjects That Are Hyperopes (Farsighted)

    Conjunctival staining measures the changes to the conjunctival surface as evaluated by the degree of staining with sodium fluorescein solution. The investigator used a grading scale of 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe.

    after 6 hours of wear

  • Assessment of Conjunctival Staining in Subjects That Are Oblique Astigmats (Have an Abnormally Curved Cornea)

    Conjunctival staining measures the changes to the conjunctival surface as evaluated by the degree of staining with sodium fluorescein solution. The investigator used a grading scale of 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe.

    after 6 hours of wear

  • Assessment of Papillary Conjunctivitis in Subjects That Are High Myopes (Have a High Degree of Nearsightedness)

    Papillary conjunctivitis measures the changes to the conjunctival surface on the underside of the upper eyelid. The investigator used a grading scale of 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe.

    after 6 hours of wear

  • Assessment of Papillary Conjunctivitis in Subjects That Are Hyperopes (Farsighted)

    Papillary conjunctivitis measures the changes to the conjunctival surface on the underside of the upper eyelid. The investigator used a grading scale of 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe.

    after 6 hours of wear

  • Assessment of Papillary Conjunctivitis in Subjects That Are Oblique Astigmats (Have an Abnormally Curved Cornea)

    Papillary conjunctivitis measures the changes to the conjunctival surface on the underside of the upper eyelid. The investigator used a grading scale of 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe.

    after 6 hours of wear

Study Arms (2)

senofilcon A/galyfilcon A

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

senofilcon A silicone hydrogel toric contact lenses will be worn first. galyfilcon A silicone hydrogel toric contact lenses will be worn second.

Device: senofilcon A toricDevice: galyfilcon A toric

galyfilcon A/senofilcon A

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

galyfilcon A silicone hydrogel toric contact lenses worn first. senofilcon A silicone hydrogel toric contact lenses worn second.

Device: senofilcon A toricDevice: galyfilcon A toric

Interventions

silicone hydrogel contact lens for patients with astigmatism

Also known as: Acuvue Oasys for Astigmatism
galyfilcon A/senofilcon Asenofilcon A/galyfilcon A

silicone hydrogel contact lens for patients with astigmatism

Also known as: Acuvue Advance for Astigmatism
galyfilcon A/senofilcon Asenofilcon A/galyfilcon A

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Able to wear study lenses in parameters available.
  • At least 18
  • understand and sign informed consent
  • willing to follow the protocol
  • achieve at least 6/9 Visual Acuity (VA), both eyes (OU) with study lenses
  • hyperopes: +2.00 to +4.00 with -0.75 D cylinder around 180, high myopes: -6.00 to -8.00 with -1.25 D cylinder around 180
  • oblique axis: -2.00 to -4.00 with -0.75 D cyl around 45 or 135, have worn Soft Contact Lenses's within last 6 months

You may not qualify if:

  • Any ocular or systemic disorder which may contraindicate Contact Lens (CL) wear
  • any topical ocular medication
  • aphakic
  • corneal refractive surgery,
  • corneal distortion from hard CL wear or keratoconus
  • pregnant or lactating
  • grade 2 or worse slit lamp signs
  • infectious disease
  • previous clinical study within 2 weeks
  • don't agree to participate

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Eurolens Research

Manchester, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Astigmatism

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Refractive ErrorsEye Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
John Buch OD
Organization
Vistakon

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2008

First Posted

June 13, 2008

Study Start

May 1, 2008

Primary Completion

September 1, 2008

Study Completion

September 1, 2008

Last Updated

May 22, 2015

Results First Posted

October 1, 2010

Record last verified: 2015-05

Locations