Evaluation of a Diabetes Data Management System
1 other identifier
observational
51
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate a diabetes data management program in the hands of potential users, both health care professionals and lay users.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jul 2008
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 6, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 10, 2008
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 23, 2009
CompletedFebruary 29, 2016
January 1, 2016
Same day
June 6, 2008
July 1, 2009
January 29, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Number of Participants That Rated 80% of Tasks as Very Simple, Simple, or Neither Simple Nor Difficult (Ease of Use of the Software Program)
After completing each task, subjects rated the ease of performing each task on a scale of 1 to 5. 1. Very Simple 2. Simple 3. Neither simple nor difficult 4. Difficult 5. Very Difficult Outcome measure was the number of participants that rated 80% of tasks as 1,2, or 3.
1-2 hours
Number of Participants Rated as <= 3 (Success in Using the Program)
Subjects were rated by study staff as to their success at performing basic tasks. The rating scale was: 1. successful 2. successful after being referred to user instructions 3. success with assistance (similar to a customer call) 4. unsuccessful 5 = software problem Outcome measure was the number of participants rated as \<= 3.
1-2 hours
Number of Participants That Could Answer at Least 85% of the Comprehension Questions Correctly (Comprehension of the Program Reports)
Subjects were asked thirty questions throughout the evaluation to test whether they understood the data displays, graphs and features of the software. Outcome measure was the number of participants that could answer at least 85% of the comprehension questions correctly.
1-2 hours
Study Arms (1)
health care professionals and lay users
h= 8 health care professionals p= 43 lay users
Eligibility Criteria
Lay users males or females and health care professionals.
You may qualify if:
- Health Care Professionals:
- Must have experience using diabetes data management software in the medical office such as downloading meters, reviewing reports (computer screen or printouts), or assisting in patients' diabetes disease management using software.
- May include: endocrinologists, primary care physicians, nurse educators, or other medical staff involved in downloading meters or interpreting the data output.
- Lay users must:
- Be at least 18 years of age.
- Have diabetes (or be the parent or legal guardian of a child with diabetes) and have been testing blood sugar at home at least twice daily for one month or more.
- Be able to speak, read and understand English.
- Currently using diabetes management software at home or be familiar with diabetes management software. At least 75% of subjects must have been using software for at least one month.
- Have experience using PC programs or browsing the internet.
You may not qualify if:
- Persons working for a competitive medical device company.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
AMCR Institute
Escondido, California, 92026, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Research Scientist
- Organization
- Ascensia Diabetes Care
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Timothy Bailey, MD
AMCR Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 6, 2008
First Posted
June 10, 2008
Study Start
July 1, 2008
Primary Completion
July 1, 2008
Study Completion
July 1, 2008
Last Updated
February 29, 2016
Results First Posted
September 23, 2009
Record last verified: 2016-01